Journals / Perinatal journal (Online) / 2022 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2

Has the COVID-19 delayed the diagnosis of fetal anomalies and reduced in the follow-up of high-risk pregnancies?

Pages
128–135
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In experienced perinatal centers, if the concerns of patients are relieved and they are examined under suitable conditions for the pandemic, there will be no delay in diagnosis of fetal anomalies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: COVID-19 has deeply affected our lives in terms of social, economic, education, and health issues.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Pregnant women have had concerns about routine antenatal care visits and decreased follow-up numbers due to concern of COVID-19 transmission.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In experienced perinatal centers, if the concerns of patients are relieved and they are examined under suitable conditions for the pandemic, there will be no delay in diagnosis of fetal anomalies.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: COVID-19 has deeply affected our lives in terms of social, economic, education, and health issues. Pregnant women have had concerns about routine antenatal care visits and decreased follow-up numbers due to concern of COVID-19 transmission. We aimed to evaluate whether there is a delay in the diagnosis of fetal anomaly during the COVID-19 pandemic period and whether patients diagnosed with fetal anomaly attend antenatal care regularly or not, and to investigate the factors that prevent them from regular follow-up. Methods: Pregnant women diagnosed with fetal anomaly during pandemic period (March 1, 2020 to September 1, 2020) and diagnosed with fetal anomaly before pandemic period (September 1, 2019 to February 28, 2020) were compared with a questionnaire in terms of antenatal follow-up frequency and gestational age of fetal anomaly diagnosis. Results: In the during pandemic period group, regular pregnancy follow-up was decreased from 87% to 51% because of maternal anxiety, fear of virus transmission in hospital and the anxiety of passing it on to baby. Attending a detailed ultrasound scan for detecting fetal anomaly at 18–22 weeks was significantly lower in the during pandemic group. In the pandemic period, the most commonly diagnosed fetal anomalies were central and peripheral nervous system, and cardiovascular and gastrointestinal system anomalies similar to the before pandemic period group. The mean frequency of follow-ups in the third trimester in the before pandemic period group and during pandemic period group was 6.02 (±2.36) times and 4.02 (±1.97) times, respectively, and it was a considerable and statistically significant decrease. In addition, the mean week of fetal anomaly diagnosis was 23±6 weeks in during pandemic group, while it was 22±5 weeks in before pandemic group, and there was no statistically significant difference. Conclusion: Antenatal follow-up of the patients has been decreased significantly during the pandemic period, although it does not seem to cause delay in the diagnosis of fetal anomaly. In experienced perinatal centers, if the concerns of patients are relieved and they are examined under suitable conditions for the pandemic, there will be no delay in diagnosis of fetal anomalies.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOKALIOĞLU, E. Ö., YETİŞKİN, F. D. Y., BESİMOĞLU, B., TEKİN, Ö. M., ŞAHİN, D., TANAÇAN, A., YAKIŞTIRAN, B., AYHAN, Ş. G., OLUKLU, D., KOÇ, E. M. E., EYİ, E. G. (2022). Has the COVID-19 delayed the diagnosis of fetal anomalies and reduced in the follow-up of high-risk pregnancies?. Perinatal journal (Online), Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2, 128–135. https://ajindex.com/articles/588291

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, Li X, Yang B, Song J, et al.
  2. China Novel Coronavirus Investigating and Research Team. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. New England J Med 2020
  3. 727–33. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 2. Ng Q, Koh K, Tagore S, Mathur M. Perception and feelings of antenatal women during COVID-19 pandemic: a crosssectional survey. Ann Acad Med Singap 2020
  4. 543–52. [PubMed] 3. Sinaci S, Tokalioglu EO, Ocal D, Atalay A, Yilmaz G, Keskin HL, et al. Does having a high-risk pregnancy influence anxiety level during the COVID-19 pandemic? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2020
  5. 190–6. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 4. Muhaidat N, Fram K, Thekrallah F, Qatawneh A, Al-Btoush A. Pregnancy during COVID-19 outbreak: the impact of lockdown in a middle-income country on antenatal healthcare and wellbeing. Int J Womens Health 2020
  6. 1065–73. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 5. Boelig RC, Saccone G, Bellussi F, Berghella V. MFM guidance for COVID-19. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2020
  7. 100106. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 6. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Coronavirus (COVID-9) infection and pregnancy. London: RCOG
  8. Practice bulletin no. 162: Prenatal diagnostic testing for genetic disorders. Obstet Gynecol 2016
  9. e108–e22. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 8. Deprest J, Choolani M, Chervenak F, Farmer D, Lagrou K, Lopriore E, et al. Fetal diagnosis and therapy during the COVID-19 pandemic: guidance on behalf of the international fetal medicine and surgery society. Fetal Diagn Ther 2020
  10. 689–98. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 9. Bahtiyar MO, Baschat A, Deprest J, Emery S, Goodnight WH, Johnson A, et al. Fetal interventions in the setting of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: statement from the North American Fetal Therapy Network. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020
  11. 281–4. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 10. Ozalp M, Demir O, Akbas H, Kaya E, Celik C, Osmanagaoglu MA. Effect of COVID-19 pandemic process on prenatal diagnostic procedures. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2021
  12. 3952–7. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 11. Peahl AF, Powell A, Berlin H, Smith RD, Krans E, Waljee V, et al. Patient and provider perspectives of a new prenatal care model introduced in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021
  13. e1–e11. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 12. Tsioufis K, Chrysohoou C, Kariori M, Leontsinis I, Dalakouras I, Papnikolaou A, et al. The mystery of “missing” visits in an emergency cardiology department, in the era of COVID-19.
  14. a time-series analysis in a tertiary Gre