Journals / Çukurova Anestezi ve Cerrahi Bilimler Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2

Nephron-sparing Surgery in Localized Kidney Tumors

Lokalize Böbrek Tümörlerinde Nefron Koruyucu Cerrahi

Pages
82–89
Publication Date
2019-08-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this review, we discussed the indications, advantages and disadvantages of nephron sparing surgery (NSS) in localized renal tumors.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:As a result of the increasing and routine use of imaging methods, there is a significant increase in the number of asymptomatic small volume localized kidney tumors incidentally detected.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Although open radical nephrectomy has been accepted as the gold standard method for the treatment of localized renal tumors for many years, organ conservative approach has gained popularity in the last 3 decades.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this review, we discussed the indications, advantages and disadvantages of nephron sparing surgery (NSS) in localized renal tumors.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Böbrek · Nefron Koruyucu Cerrahi · Böbrek tümörü

Abstract

As a result of the increasing and routine use of imaging methods, there is a significant increase in the number of asymptomatic small volume localized kidney tumors incidentally detected. The masses which is limited to the kidney and not spread to the body are defined as localized kidney cancer. Although open radical nephrectomy has been accepted as the gold standard method for the treatment of localized renal tumors for many years, organ conservative approach has gained popularity in the last 3 decades. For the patient with localized kidney cancer, the choice of treatment needs to be individualized and the preservation of renal function without affecting the oncologic outcome should be the most important goal in the decision-making process. The patient's performance status and surgical expertise will be important factors in advising the patient about the most appropriate treatment option. In this review, we discussed the indications, advantages and disadvantages of nephron sparing surgery (NSS) in localized renal tumors.

Özet

Günümüzde görüntüleme yöntemlerinin artması ve rutin olarak kullanılması nedeniyle insidental olarak tespit edilen asemptomatik, küçük hacimli lokalize böbrek tümörlerinin sayısında belirgin artış saptanmıştır. Tümörün böbreğe sınırlı kaldığı ve vücuda yayılmadığı kitleler lokalize böbrek kanseri olarak tanımlanmaktadır. Uzun yıllar açık radikal nefrektomi lokalize böbrek tümörlerinin tedavisinde altın standart yöntem olarak kabul edilip uygulanmakla birlikte son 3 dekkaddır organ koruyucu yaklaşım popülarite kazanmıştır. Lokalize böbrek kanserinin yönetiminde laparoskopi ve minimal invaziv tekniklerin getirilmesi ile karşılaştırılabilir onkolojik sonuçlar elde edildi ve morbiditenin azaltılmasına sebep olundu. Lokalize böbrek kanserli hasta için tedavi seçiminin bireyselleştirilmesi gerekir ve onkolojik sonucu etkilemeden böbrek fonksiyonunun korunması karar verme sürecinde en önemli amaç olmalıdır. Hastanın performans durumu ve cerrahi uzmanlığı, hastaya en uygun tedavi seçeneği hakkında tavsiyede bulunurken önemli faktörler olacaktır. Biz bu derlemede lokalize böbrek tümörlerinde nefron koruyucu cerrahinin (NKC) ameliyat yöntemlerini endikasyonları, avantajları ve dezavantajlarını ele aldık.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEGER, M., İZOL, V., TANSUĞ, M. Z. (2019). Nephron-sparing Surgery in Localized Kidney Tumors. Çukurova Anestezi ve Cerrahi Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2, 82–89. https://ajindex.com/articles/483890

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Referans1- Parkin DM, Whelan SL, Ferlay J, Raymond L, Young J, (ed.), Cancer incidence in five in continents. v. 7. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer 1997. Referans2- Chow WH, Devesa SS, Warren JL, Fraumeni JF. Rising incidence of renal cell cancer in the United States. JAMA 1999; 281:1628-1631. Referans3- McLaughlin JK, Lipworth L, Tarone RE. Epidemiologic aspects of renal cell carcinoma. Semin Oncol. 2006 Oct;33(5):527-33. Referans4- Stephenson AJ, Chetner MP, Rourke K, Gleave ME, Signaevsky M, Palmer B, Kuan J, Brock GB, Tanguay S. Guidelines for the surveillance of localized renal cell carcinoma based on the patterns of relapse after nephrectomy. J Urol. 2004 Jul;172(1):58-62 Referans5- Novick AC. Renal-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma. Urol Clin North Am 1993;20(2):277–282 Referans6- Campbell SC, Novick AC, Belldegrun A, et al; Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Urological Association. Guideline for management of the clinical T1 renal mass. J Urol 2009;182(4): 1271–1279 Referans7- Ljungberg B, Cowan NC, Hanbury DC, et al. EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: the 2010 update. Eur Urol 2010;58:398–406. Referans8- Thompson RH, Boorjian SA, Lohse CM, et al. Radical nephrectomy for pT1a renal masses may be associated with decreased overall survival compared with partial nephrectomy. J Urol 2008;179: 468–73. Referans9- Huang WC, Levey AS, Serio AM, et al. Chronic kidney disease after nephrectomy in patients with renal cortical tumours: a retrospec- tive cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2006;7:735–40. Referans10- Margreiter M, Marberger M. Current status of open partial nephrec- tomy. Curr Opin Urol 2010;20:361–4. Referans11- Marszalek M, Meixl H, Polajnar M, Rauchenwald M, Jescke K, Madersbacher S. Laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair comparison of 200 patients. Eur Urol 2009;55:1171–8. Referans12- Klatte T, et al. A Literature Review of Renal Surgical Anatomy and Surgical Strategies for Partial Nephrectomy. Eur Urol. 2015; 68:980–992. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.04.010 [PubMed: 25911061] Referans13- Crestani A, et al. Introduction to small renal tumours and prognostic indicators. Int J Surg. 2016 Referans14- Gill IS, Kavoussi LR, Lane BR, et al. Comparison of 1800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors. J Urol 2007; 178:41–6. Referans15- Gill IS, Matin SF, Desai MM, et al. Comparative analysis of laparo- scopic versus open partial nephrectomy in 200 cases. J Urol 2003; 170:64–