Journals / Journal of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases / 2012 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 01

The follow-up results with sustained virologic response in chronic hepatitisC patients in Sanliurfa/Turkey

Pages
14–20
Publication Date
2012-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusions: In conclusion, there was no recurrence of HCV infection beyond follow-up of 24 months in any of the patients who obtained SVR.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The aim of the study was to evaluate sustained virological response (SVR) after treatment and factors that influence SVR among patients treated for chronic hepatitis C (CHC).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and methods: The study was conducted in patients with CHC between April 2007 and March 2011, who had achieved SVR following treatment.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusions: In conclusion, there was no recurrence of HCV infection beyond follow-up of 24 months in any of the patients who obtained SVR.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Chronic hepatitis C · genotype · sustained virological response

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of the study was to evaluate sustained virological response (SVR) after treatment and factors that influence SVR among patients treated for chronic hepatitis C (CHC). Materials and methods: The study was conducted in patients with CHC between April 2007 and March 2011, who had achieved SVR following treatment. They were treated with PEG IFN-&alpha; and ribavirin. Patients, whose end of treatment responses were obtained without a SVR, received a second course of treatment. Results: A total of 124 patients, 61 female (49.2%) were enrolled in the study. The distribution of genotypes was: 102 patients with genotype 1 (82.3%) and 22 with genotype 2 (17.7%). SVR was achieved in 78 patients (62.9%) (67 during the first course and 11 in the second) were followed up for a mean duration of 18.4&plusmn;8.5 months. Positive predictive factors on SVR were female gender (P=0.01), low initial viral load (P=0.01), early virological response (EVR) development (P<0.001) and infection with genotype 2 (P<0.001). Conclusions: In conclusion, there was no recurrence of HCV infection beyond follow-up of 24 months in any of the patients who obtained SVR. Female gender, low initial viral load, development of EVR and infection with genotype 2 was determined to have a positive impact on SVR.

🔖

Cite This Article

KORUK, S. T., KORUK, İ., CALİSİR, C., KARSEN, H. (2012). The follow-up results with sustained virologic response in chronic hepatitisC patients in Sanliurfa/Turkey. Journal of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 01, 14–20. https://ajindex.com/articles/48344

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Lavanchy D. The global burden of hepatitis C. Liver Int 2009; 29: 74-81.
  2. Shepard CW, Finelli L, Alter MJ. Global epidemiology of hepa- titis C virus infection. Lancet Infect Dis 2005; 5: 558–567. European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatitis C virus infec- tion. J Hepatology 2011; 55:245-264.
  3. Thompson CJ, Rogers G, Hewson P, et al. Surveillance of cir- rhosis for hepatocellular carcinoma: systematic review and economic analysis. Health Technol Asess 2007; 11:1-206.
  4. Simmonds P, Bukh J, Combet C, et al. Consensus propos- als for a unified system of nomenclature of hepatitis C virus genotypes. Hepatology 2005; 42: 962-973.
  5. Esteban JI, Sauleda S, Quer J. The changing epidemiology of hepatitis C virus infection in Europe. J Hepatol 2008; 48:148- 162. Fried MW, Shiffman ML, Reddy KR, et al. Peginterferon alfa- 2a plus ribavirin for chronic 6 hepatitis C virus infection. N Eng J Med 2002; 347:975-982.
  6. Hadziyannis SJ, Sette H, Morgan T, et al. Peginterferon al- fa-2a (40 kilodaltons) andribavirin combination therapy in chronic hepatitis C: randomized study of treatment duration and ribavirin dose. Ann Intern Med 2004; 140:346-357.
  7. Manns MP, Wedemeyer H, Cornberg M. Treating viral hepatitis C: efficacy, side effects, and complications. Gut 2006; 55: 1350–1359.
  8. Strader DB, Wright T, Thomas DL, Seelf LB, Diagnosis, management and treatment of hepatitis C. AASLD Practice Guidelines. Hepatology 2004; 1147-1158.
  9. Michelin BD, Muller Z, Stelzl E, Marth E, Kessler HH. Evalu- ation of the Abbott Real Time HCV assay for quantitative de- tection of hepatitis C virus RNA. J Clin Virol 2007; 38:96-100.
  10. Stuyver L, Wyseur A, van Arnhem W, Hernandez F, Maertens G. Second generation line probe assay for hepatitis C virus genotyping. J Clin Microbiol 1996; 34:2259-2266.
  11. Yun Z, Lara C, Johansson B, Lorenzana de Rivera I, Son- nerborg A. Discrepancy of hepatitis C virus genotypes as determined by phylogenetic analysis of partial NS5 and core sequences. J Med Virol 1996; 49:155-160.
  12. Ishak K, Baptista A, Bianchi L, et al. Histological grading and staging of chronic hepatitis. J Hepatol 1995: 22:696-699. The Global Burden of Hepatitis C Working Group. Global burden of disease (GBD) for hepatitis C. J Clin Pharmacol 2004; 44: 20-29.
  13. Brok J, Gluud LL, Gluud C. Meta-analysis: Ribavirin plus in- terferon vs. interferon monotherapy for chronic hepatitis C– an updated Cochrane review. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010; 32:840-850. Ghany M