Journals / ÇOMÜ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1

Verification of An Efficient Method for the Determination of Some Pesticide Residues in Nectarine and Peach

Nektarin ve Şeftali Örneklerinde Bazı Pestisit Kalıntılarının Belirlenmesi İçin Etkin Bir Yöntemin Doğrulanması

Pages
69–75
Publication Date
2022-07-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Overall recovery of the QuEChERS-AOAC 2007.01 method was 113.96 %, with RSD value of 14.52 % (n=156; SD=16.55).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Method verification is an internal quality control procedure verifying the suitability of the method for specific purposes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Samples spiked at 3 levels of 3 different pesticides.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Overall recovery of the QuEChERS-AOAC 2007.01 method was 113.96 %, with RSD value of 14.52 % (n=156; SD=16.55).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Şeftali · Nektarin · Pestisit Kalıntısı

Abstract

Method verification is an internal quality control procedure verifying the suitability of the method for specific purposes. All methods should be verified prior to analyses of real samples. LOQ, range of linearity, precision, accuracy and recovery criteria have to be taken into consideration while performing the method verification. This study was conducted to verify QuEChERS procedure for the analysis of boscalid, chlorpyrifos and tebuconazole in nectarine and peach. Samples spiked at 3 levels of 3 different pesticides. LC-MS/MS was used for chromatographic separation. Matrix calibration (MC) was used to compensate the matrix effect. QuEChERS method revealed that all pesticide LOQs were less than MRL. Recovered boscalid, chlorpyrifos and tebuconazole from matrices were recorded as 123.73% (RSD= 8.89%; n=52), 108.37% (RSD= 14.95%; n=52) and 110.34% (RSD= 15.22%; n=52), respectively. Overall recovery of the QuEChERS-AOAC 2007.01 method was 113.96 %, with RSD value of 14.52 % (n=156; SD=16.55). All recovery ranges were noted as 66.42-139.68%. These values were fit the SANTE recovery ranges (60–140%). MC curves 3 pesticides were linear (R2 ≤0.999). Some other verification criteria, such as accuracy, linearity, precision and recovery were within the specified limits. According to the results of this study, the QuEChERS method is suitable for the analyses of chlorpyrifos, tebuconazole and boscalid in case of nectarine and peachs.

Özet

Metot doğrulama, yöntemin belirli bir amaca uygunluğunu doğrulayan bir iç kalite kontrol prosedürüdür. Gerçek örneklerin analizinden önce tüm analiz metotları doğrulanmalıdır. Metot doğrulamasını gerçekleştirmek için LOQ, doğrusal aralık, kesinlik, doğruluk ve geri kazanım gibi kriterler dikkate alınmalıdır. Bu çalışma nektarin ve şeftalide boscalid, chlorpyrifos ve tebuconazole analizi için QuEChERS analiz prosedürünü doğrulamak amacıyla yapılmıştır. Nektarin ve şeftali örnekleri 3 farklı seviyede 3 pestisitle spike edilmiştir. Ekstraksiyon ve clean-up basamakları için QuEChERS yöntemi uygulanmuştır. Kromatografik ayrıştırma LC-MS/MS ile yapılmıştır. Matris etkisini elimine etmek için matrisli kalibrasyon (MC) kullanılmıştır. QuEChERS metodu-LC-MS/MS analiz sistemi, pestisitlerin LOQ'larının MRL'nin altında olduğunu göstermiştir. Chlorpyrifos, tebuconazole ve boscalid pestisitlerinin nektarin örneklerinden geri alımları, sırasıyla %108.1, %109.9, ve %124.5 olarak bulunmuştur. Bu değerler şeftali örnekleri için sırasıyla, %108.4, %109.9 ve %122.3 şeklinde olmuştur. Yöntemin tüm geri alımı nektarin için %113.6, şeftali %113.5 olmuştur. Bu değerler SANTE geri kazanım limitleri (%60–140) ile uyumludur. MC eğrileri 3 pestisit için de doğrusal (R2 ≤0.999) olarak bulunmuştur. Geri alım, kesinlik, doğruluk ve doğrusallık gibi bazı diğer yöntem doğrulama kriterleri gerekli aralıklarda bulunmuştur. Nektarin ve şeftali örneklerinde, chlorpyrifos, tebuconazole and boscalid kalıntılarının analizleri için QuEChERS yöntemi uygun bulunmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

DÜLGER, H., TİRYAKİ, O. (2022). Verification of An Efficient Method for the Determination of Some Pesticide Residues in Nectarine and Peach. ÇOMÜ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1, 69–75. https://ajindex.com/articles/483353

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Anastassiades, M., Lehotay, S.J., Stajnbaher, D., Schenck, F.J., 2003. Fast and easy multiresidue method employing acetonitrile extraction/partitioning and dispersive solid-phase extraction for the determination of pesticide residues in produce. J. AOAC Int. 86: 412–431. Anonymous, 1999. Guidelines for Single-laboratory Validation of Analytical Methods for Trace-level Concentrations of Organic Chemicals AOAC/FAO/IAEA/IUPAC Expert Consultation Meeting, Miskolc, Hungary, 8-11 November, 1999. http://www.iaea.org/trc/ pest-qa_val_ guide.pdf Brankovic, M., Andelkovic, D., Kocic, H., Kocic, G., 2019. Assessment of GC–MS Response of Selected Pesticides in Apple Matrices Related to Matrix Concentration. J. Environ. Sci. Health B 54: 376–386. CAC, 2003. Representative Commodities/Samples for Validation of Analytical Procedures for Pesticide Residues. In Codex Alimentarius Commission Guidelines on Good Laboratory Practice in Pesticide Residue Analysis. CAC/GL 40-1993.
  2. Çatak, H., Tiryaki, O., 2020. Insecticide residue analyses in cucumbers sampled from Çanakkale open markets. Turkish Journal Of Entomology. 44(4): 449-460.
  3. Dashtbozorgi, Z., Ramezanib, K. M., Waqif-Husaina, S., 2013. Optimization and validation of a new pesticide residue method for cucumber and tomato using acetonitrile-based extraction-dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction followed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The Royal Society of Chemistry. 5:1192-1198. EC, 2002. Commission Directive 2002/63/EC of 11 July 2002 Establishing Community Methods of Sampling for the Official Control of Pesticide Residues in and on Products of Plant and Animal Origin and Repealing. Directive 79/700/EEC. Offi. Journal of European Commission 2002, L 187/30, 1–14. EURACHEM, 2014. The fitness for purpose of analytical methods -a laboratory guide to method validation and related topics. Second Edition. URL: http://www.eurachem.org EURACHEM/CITAC, 2000. Guide quantifying uncertainty in analytical measurements, 2nd edn. 2000,
  4. LGC United Kingdom, EMPA Switzerland, 1-126 http://www.citac.cc/QUAM2000-1.pdf.
  5. Galietta, G., Egaña, E., Gemelli, F., Maeso, D., Casco, N., Conde, P., & Nuñez, S. (2011). Pesticide dissipation curves in peach, pear and tomato crops in Uruguay. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B., 46, 35-40. https://doi.org/10.1080 /03601234.2010.515504 Green, M.A., 1996. A Practical guide to analytical method validation. Anal Chem. 68:305A–309A. Kanrar, B., Mandal, S., Bhattacharyya,