Journals / Çağdaş Cerrahi Dergisi / 2002 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2

Simple fistulas-in-ano of cryptoglandular origin

Kriptoglandüler zeminde gelişmiş basit anal fistüller

Pages
109–112
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

All 'so called' simple fistulas in ami may not have readily detectable primary openings and may possess secondary tracts which preclude their behaviour as simple fistulas, thus may be called submusculary rather than simple fistula in ano.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:A retrospective study of 20 patients with simple fistulas in-ano of cryptoglandular origin operated on over a 3-year period at Seydişehir State Hospital was undertaken for the purpose of establishing the recurrence and incontinence rates.
📊
Key Findings & Data:There were 5 females and 15 (75 %) males, and average age was 43.5 years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:All 'so called' simple fistulas in ami may not have readily detectable primary openings and may possess secondary tracts which preclude their behaviour as simple fistulas, thus may be called submusculary rather than simple fistula in ano.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

A retrospective study of 20 patients with simple fistulas in-ano of cryptoglandular origin operated on over a 3-year period at Seydişehir State Hospital was undertaken for the purpose of establishing the recurrence and incontinence rates. More complex fistulas including high transsphincteric, suprasphinteric, extrasphincteric, ext. were excluded. There were 5 females and 15 (75 %) males, and average age was 43.5 years. Mean follow up was 15 months and followup rate was 80 %. Three (J5 %) patients developed recurrent fistulas, all of them had missed internal openings at the time of surgery, and one of them had premature fistulotomy wound closure due to irregular controls and inadequate surgical procedure. Temporary incontinence including fecal soiling and incontinence to flatus were seen at 3 (15 %) patients. All 'so called' simple fistulas in ami may not have readily detectable primary openings and may possess secondary tracts which preclude their behaviour as simple fistulas, thus may be called submusculary rather than simple fistula in ano.

Özet

Bu retrospektif çalışmada 3 yıllık bir dönem boyunca Seydişehir Devlet Hastanesinde kriptoglandüler zeminde gelişen basit analfistül nedeni ile ameliyat edilen 20 olgu, rekürrens ve inkontinans oranlan ile birlikte değerlendirildi. Yüksek transsfinkterik, suprasfinkterik, ekstrasfinkterik, vb. kompleks fistüller çalışma dışı bırakıldı. Olguların 5 (% 25)'i kadın, .15 (% 75)'i erkek olup, ortalama yaş 43.5 olarak saptandı. Olgular ortalama 15 ay süre ile % 80 oranında takip edildiler. intersfinkterik ve/veya transsfinkterik iç de/iğin görülemediği ve düzensiz kontroller sonucu erken yara dış deliğinin kapanmasına ve yetersiz cerrahi tekniğe bağlı 3 (% 15) olguda rekürrens saptandı. Fekal kirlenme ve gaz inkontinansı şeklinde 3 (% 15) olguda geçici inkontinans gelişti. Basit olarak değerlendirilen bu tür füstüillerin bazen primer deliklerinin kolayca görülemediği ve sekunder traktlannm olabileceği ve bu nedenle aslında kompleks (submüsküler) olarak değerlendirilmeleri gerektiği sonucuna varıldı.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZKAN, S., ÖZKAN, C. F. (2022). Simple fistulas-in-ano of cryptoglandular origin. Çağdaş Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2, 109–112. https://ajindex.com/articles/482257

References (21)

  1. Nelson H, Dozois RR: Anus In Towsend CM, (ed) Sabiston Textbook of Surgery, WB Saunders Company, International edi¬ tion, page 984-986, 2001
  2. Parks AC, Gordon PH, Hardcastle JD: A classification of fistula in-ano. Br J Surg 63:1-12, 1976
  3. Sangwan YP, Rosen L, Riether RD, et al: Is simple fistula in-ano simple? Dis Colon Rectum 37:885-889, 1994
  4. Lillius HG: Fistula in-ano. Acta Chir Scand Suppl 383:7-88, 1968
  5. Thompson JP: Fistula in-ano. Int J Colorectal Dis 1:270, 1986
  6. Malouf AJ, Cadogan Ml), Bartolo DC: Anal canal. In Textbook of surgery. Corson JD, Williamson RCN (eds). Mosby, First edition Spain p3.21.12-14, 2001
  7. Özkan S, Özkan FC: Transsfinkterik ve suprasfinkterik anal fistüller. Ostomi 4:18-19, 2000
  8. American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons' standarts and practice task force. Dis Colon Rectum 39:1361-1372, 1996
  9. Ramanujam PS, Prasad ML, Abscarian H, et al: Perianal abscesses and fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 27:593-597, 1984
  10. Abscarian H, Dodi G, Girona J, et al: Symposium fistula in-ano. Int J Colorectal Dis 2:51-71,1987
  11. Yang CY: Fistulotomy and rnarsupialisation for simple fistu¬ la in-ano. Singapore Med J 33:268-270, 1992
  12. Lewis A: How I do it. Excision of fistula in-ano. Int J Colorectal Dis 1:265-267, 1986
  13. Sainio P, Husa A: Fistula in-ano. Acta Chir Scand 151:169- 176,1985
  14. Seow Choen, Philips RKS: Insights gained from the man¬ agement of problematical anal fistlae at St Mark's Hospital. Br J Surg 78:539-541, 1991
  15. Mazier WP: The treatment and care of anal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 14:134-144, 1971
  16. Gingold BS: Reducing the recurrence risk of fistula in ano. Surg Gynecol Obstet 156:661-662, 1983
  17. Vasilevskv C, Gordon PH: Results of treatment of fistula in ano. Dis Colon Rectum 28:225-234, 1984
  18. Me Elwain JW, MacLean MD, Alexander RM: Anorectal problems. Dis Colon Rectum 18:646-649, 1975
  19. Henrichsen S, Christiansen J: Incidence of fistla in-ano complicating anorectal sepsis. Br J Surg 73:371, 1986
  20. Lunniss PJ, Kamm MA, Philips RKS: Factors effecting continence after surgery for anal fistula. BR J Surg 81:1382- 1385,1994
  21. Kennedy HL, Zegarro JP: Fistulotomy without external sphinter division for high anal fistula. Br J Surg 77:888-901, 1990.