Journals / Çağdaş Cerrahi Dergisi / 2002 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1

Hickman catheter and venous port application: Our experience of 463 cases

Hickman kateter ve venöz port uygulaması (463 olgudaki deneyimlerimiz)

Pages
27–30
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Although there were complications such as hemothorax and pneumothorax in cases that undergone percutaneous technique, the technique itself seems as if experienced surgeons can prefer due to the low incidence of other complications, the easiness of placement and the short duration of the procedure.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Hickman Catheter and Venous Port Application: Our experience of 463 cases During application of Hickman catheter and venous port, open or percutaneous techniques can be used.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Between June 1995 and June 2000, we applied 463 venous port and catheter under local anesthesia. 128 of the 268 venous port cases and 112 of the 195 Hickman cases were performed by using percutaneous techniques.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Although there were complications such as hemothorax and pneumothorax in cases that undergone percutaneous technique, the technique itself seems as if experienced surgeons can prefer due to the low incidence of other complications, the easiness of placement and the short duration of the procedure.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Hickman Catheter and Venous Port Application: Our experience of 463 cases During application of Hickman catheter and venous port, open or percutaneous techniques can be used. Between June 1995 and June 2000, we applied 463 venous port and catheter under local anesthesia. 128 of the 268 venous port cases and 112 of the 195 Hickman cases were performed by using percutaneous techniques. There were complications in 24 (% 10) of the 240 cases that undergone percutaneous technique and 57 (% 25.5) of 223 cases that undergone open technique. Although there were complications such as hemothorax and pneumothorax in cases that undergone percutaneous technique, the technique itself seems as if experienced surgeons can prefer due to the low incidence of other complications, the easiness of placement and the short duration of the procedure.

Özet

Hickman kateter ve venöz port uygulaması esnasında kullanılan açık ve perkutan uygulama teknikleri mevcuttur. Haziran 1995Haziran 2000 tarihleri arasında ameliyathane şartlarında lokal anestezi altında toplam 463 hastaya kateter ve port tatbiki yapılmıştır. 268 venöz port olgusunun 128'ine ve 195 Hickman olgusunun 112'sine perkutan teknik uygulanmıştır. Perkutan teknik kullanılan 240 vakanın 24'ünde (% 10) açık teknik uygulanan 223 vakanın 57'sinde (% 25.5) komplikasyona rastlanmıştır. Perkutan teknik uygulanan vakalarda hemotoraks ve pnömotoraks gibi komplikasyonların gözükmesine rağmen, diğer komplikasyonların az görülmesi, yerleştirilmesinin kolaylığı, işlem süresinin kısa olması nedeniyle deneyimli cerrahlar tarafından tercih edilebilecek bir metod olarak görülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALTINLI, E., URAS, C., BALKAN, T., EKÇİ, B., DAVRAN, E. (2022). Hickman catheter and venous port application: Our experience of 463 cases. Çağdaş Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1, 27–30. https://ajindex.com/articles/482251

References (14)

  1. Brothers TE, von Moll LK, Niederhuber JE, Roberts JA, Walker AS, Ensminger WD: Experience with subcutaneous infusion in three hundred patients. Surg Gynecol Obstet 166:265, 1988
  2. Kock HJ, Pietsch M, Krause U, Wilke H, Ergler FW: Implantable vascular access systems: Experience in 1500 patients with totally implanted central venous port systems World J Surg 22:12-16,1988
  3. Biffi R, Corrado F, deBraud F, et al: Long-term totally implantable central venous access port connected to a Groshong catheter for chemotherapy of solid tumours: experience from 178 cases using a single type of device. Eur J Cancer 33:1190-4, 1997
  4. Perkins JL, et al: The use of implantable venous access devices in children with hemophilia, j Pediatr Hemotol Oncol 19:399-44, 1997
  5. Yavuz N, Karahasanoğlu T, Sözen H, Demir G, Demirelli F, Ergüney S: İmplantabl venöz port uygulaması. Çağdaş Cerrahi Dergisi 12:165-167, 1998 6. Lazarus HM, et al: Multi-purpose silastic dual-lumen central venous catheters for both collection and transplantation of hematopoietic progenitor cells. Bone Marrow Transplant 25(7):779-85, 2000
  6. O'Neil VJ, Jeffrey Evons TR, et al: A retrospective analysis of Hickman line-associated complications in patients with solid tumours undergoing infusion. Chemotherapy Acta Oncol 38(8): 1103-7, 1999
  7. Sporisevic L, Hasanbegovic E, et al: Advantages and disadvantages in the use of central venous catheters in children witlimalignant diseases. Med Arch 53(SuppI 21): 19-22, 1999
  8. Valeri A, et al: Long-term central venous access: experience with 173 cases. MineyraChir 154(11):769-75, 1999
  9. Demirelli FH, Özgüroğlu M, Demir G: Kanser kemoterapisi uygulama ilkeleri. Bristol-Myers Squibb Onkoloji Yayınlan; 1997
  10. Altınlı E, Sarıbeyoğlu K: Vasküler Girişler. Ergüney S, Çiçek Y (Ed) Güncel Cerrahi Tedavi, İstanbul, Avrupa Tıp Kitapçılık Ltd. Şti. Yayınları; 2001, s:814-817
  11. Haindi H: Technical complications of port-catheter systems. Reg Cancer Treat 2:238-242, 1989
  12. Gyves JW, et al: A totally implanted injection port system for blood sampling and chemotherapy administration. JAMA 251:(19), 1984
  13. Wade JC, Newman KA, et al: Prolonged venous access for chemotherapy by means of the Hickman catheter. Cancer 52:185-192,1983
  14. Joanne Ingram RN, et al: Complication of indwelling venous access lines in the pediatric hematology patient: a prospective coparison of external venous catheter and subcutaneous parts. Am J Ped Hematol/Oncol 13(2): 130-136, 1991. 1