Assessment of the Effectiveness of Panoramic Radiography and Three- Dimensional Dental Volumetric Tomography with Determination of Implant Size and Position of Bone in Undercuted Regions during Implant Planning
İmplant Planlaması Sırasında Andırkatlı Bölgelerde Kemikiçi İmplant Boyutlarının ve Pozisyonlarının Belirlenmesinde Panoramik Radyografi ve Üç Boyutlu Dental Volumetrik Tomografinin Etkinliğinin Değerlendirilmesi
Differences betweenprevious and subsequent measurements were statistically examined in 35different records by all participating dentistry students individually and asa whole.Results: There was a statistically significant difference between implantlength (p=0.028), thickness (p=0.001), and angular positioning (p=0.001)when evaluating OPTG records, model casts, and intraoral photograph datavia 3DDVTs as a whole and individually.Conclusion: It is important to use 3DDVTs for implant planning in the mandibularmolar region.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To detect and compare differences in implant length, diameter,and position angle application during implant planning, which dentistsmake full use of intraoral photography, plaster model, and two-dimensionalpanoramic radiographs (OPTGs), and review only in Three DimensionalDental Volumetric Tomoghraphies (3DDVTs).Methods: Three dentistry students were asked to perform implant planningobserving the intraoral photographs of patients, model casts, andOPTGs and a digital environment with only 3DDVTs.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Objective: To detect and compare differences in implant length, diameter,and position angle application during implant planning, which dentistsmake full use of intraoral photography, plaster model, and two-dimensionalpanoramic radiographs (OPTGs), and review only in Three DimensionalDental Volumetric Tomoghraphies (3DDVTs).Methods: Three dentistry students were asked to perform implant planningobserving the intraoral photographs of patients, model casts, andOPTGs and a digital environment with only 3DDVTs.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Differences betweenprevious and subsequent measurements were statistically examined in 35different records by all participating dentistry students individually and asa whole.Results: There was a statistically significant difference between implantlength (p=0.028), thickness (p=0.001), and angular positioning (p=0.001)when evaluating OPTG records, model casts, and intraoral photograph datavia 3DDVTs as a whole and individually.Conclusion: It is important to use 3DDVTs for implant planning in the mandibularmolar region.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Panoramik radyografi · üç boyutlu dental volumetrik tomografi · implant tedavi planlaması
Abstract
Objective: To detect and compare differences in implant length, diameter,and position angle application during implant planning, which dentistsmake full use of intraoral photography, plaster model, and two-dimensionalpanoramic radiographs (OPTGs), and review only in Three DimensionalDental Volumetric Tomoghraphies (3DDVTs).Methods: Three dentistry students were asked to perform implant planningobserving the intraoral photographs of patients, model casts, andOPTGs and a digital environment with only 3DDVTs. Differences betweenprevious and subsequent measurements were statistically examined in 35different records by all participating dentistry students individually and asa whole.Results: There was a statistically significant difference between implantlength (p=0.028), thickness (p=0.001), and angular positioning (p=0.001)when evaluating OPTG records, model casts, and intraoral photograph datavia 3DDVTs as a whole and individually.Conclusion: It is important to use 3DDVTs for implant planning in the mandibularmolar region.
Özet
Amaç: Diş hekimlerinin intraoral fotoğraf, alçı model ve iki panoramik grafilerin
AKTOP, S., ATALI, O. (2018). Assessment of the Effectiveness of Panoramic Radiography and Three- Dimensional Dental Volumetric Tomography with Determination of Implant Size and Position of Bone in Undercuted Regions during Implant Planning. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 14–18. https://ajindex.com/articles/481721
Sarment DP, Sukovic P, Clinthorne N. Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical guide. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003; 18: 571-7.