Journals / Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1

The Bond Strength of Universal Adhesives with Different Acidities to Calcium Silicate-Based Materials

Pages
170–174
Publication Date
2021-03-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The results indicate that the acidity of a universal adhesive does not affect the bond strength of composite resin to calcium silicate-based materials.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To compare the micro-shear bond strengths of 3 different universal adhesives to 2 different calcium silicate-based materials.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: A hole was prepared in the center of the top surfaces of 60 cylindrical acrylic blocks, and the blocks were randomly divided into 2 groups (n=30) according to biomaterial filling; NeoMTA Plus (Avalon Biomed Inc.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The results indicate that the acidity of a universal adhesive does not affect the bond strength of composite resin to calcium silicate-based materials.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:calcium silicate · shear strength · universal adhesives

Abstract

Objective: To compare the micro-shear bond strengths of 3 different universal adhesives to 2 different calcium silicate-based materials. Methods: A hole was prepared in the center of the top surfaces of 60 cylindrical acrylic blocks, and the blocks were randomly divided into 2 groups (n=30) according to biomaterial filling; NeoMTA Plus (Avalon Biomed Inc. Bradenton, FL, USA) and ProRoot MTA (Dentsply Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, USA). Biomaterials were prepared according to the manufacturers’ instructions. The sample surfaces were flattened after the initial setting, and the samples were incubated for 24h at 37°C. After placing the biomaterials in the prepared holes, the specimens were randomly divided into 3 subgroups (n=10) according to adhesive; G-Premio Bond (GC Corp., Tokyo, Japan), All-Bond Universal (Bisco, Inc., Schaumburg, IL, USA) and Single Bond Universal (3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA). Adhesives were applied to the specimens and polymerized. A micro-hybrid composite resin (Filtek Z250, 3M ESPE, MN, USA) was then placed on the specimen surfaces and polymerized. Micro-shear bond strengths were tested using a universal testing device (LRX, Lloyd Instruments, Farnham, UK). A Shapiro-Wilk test confirmed normal distribution, and 2-way ANOVA was used for statistical analysis. Result: No significant differences were found in the shear bond strengths of any of the tested adhesives to either of the calcium silicate-based materials (p>0.05). Conclusion: The results indicate that the acidity of a universal adhesive does not affect the bond strength of composite resin to calcium silicate-based materials.

🔖

Cite This Article

KALYONCUOĞLU, E., KESKİN, C., ACAR, D., GONULOL, N. (2021). The Bond Strength of Universal Adhesives with Different Acidities to Calcium Silicate-Based Materials. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1, 170–174. https://ajindex.com/articles/481636

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Gandolfi MG, Spagnuolo G, Siboni F, Procino A, Rivieccio V, Pelliccioni GA, et al. Calcium silicate/calcium phosphate biphasic cements for vital pulp therapy: chemical- physical properties and human pulp cells response. Clin Oral Invest 2015; 19: 2075-2089.
  2. Bjorndal L, Demant S, Dabelsteen S. Depth and activity of carious lesions as indicators for the regenerative potential of dental pulp after intervention. J Endod 2014; 40: 76-81.
  3. Cohen BD, Combe EC. Development of new adhesive pulp capping materials. Dent Update 1994; 21: 57-62.
  4. Brizuela C, Ormeño A, Cabrera C, Cabezas R, Silva CI, Ramirez V, et al. Direct Pulp Capping with Calcium Hydroxide, Mineral Trioxide Aggregate and Biodentine in Permanent Young Teeth with Caries: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Endod 2017; 43: 1776-1780.
  5. Santos PSD, Pedrotti D, Braga MM, Rocha RDO, Lenzi TL. Materials used for indirect pulp treatment in primary teeth: a mixed treatment comparisons meta-analysis. Braz Oral Res 2017; 31. e101. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107/2017.vol31.0101 Torabinejad M, Chivian N. Clinical applications of mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod 1999; 25: 197-205.
  6. Ford TR, Torabinejad M, Abedi HR, Bakland LK, Kariyawasam SP. Using mineral trioxide aggregate as a pulp capping material. J Am Dent Assoc 1996; 127: 1491-1494.
  7. Altunsoy M, Tanrıver M, Ok E, Kucukyilmaz E. Shear bond strength of a self-adhering flowable composite and a flowable base composite to mineral trioxide aggregate, calcium-enriched mixture cement, and Biodentine. J Endod 2015; 41: 1691-1695.
  8. Tunc ES, Sonmez IS, Bayrak S, Eğilmez T. The evaluation of bond strength of a composite and a compomer to white mineral trioxide aggregate with two different bonding systems. J Endod 2008; 34: 603–605.
  9. Tyagi N, Chaman C, Tyagi SP, Singh UP, Sharma A. The shear bond strength of MTA with three different types of adhesive systems: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2016; 19: 130-133.
  10. Kayahan MB, Nekoofar MH, Kazandağ M, Canpolat C, Malkondu O, Kaptan F, et al. Effect of acid-etching procedure on selected physical properties of mineral trioxide aggregate. Int Endod J 2009; 42: 1004-1014.
  11. Shafiei F, Mohammadparast P, Jowkar Z. Adhesion performance of a universal adhesive in the root canal: Effect of etch-and-rinse vs. self-etch mode. PloS one 2018; 13: 4. e0195367 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195367 Moura SK, Reis A, Pelizzaro A, Dal-Bianco K, Loguercio AD, Arana-Chavez VE, et al. Bond strength and morphology of enamel using self-etching adhesive systems with dif