SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences / 2019 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3

In Vitro Comparison of the Effectiveness of a Resin Infiltration System and a Dental Adhesive System in Dentinal Tubule Penetration

Esra OZYURT
Hacer Deniz ARİSU
Emin TURKOZ
Pages
253–260
Publication Date
2019-09-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: According to the results of this study, it can be concluded that tubuler penetration effectivenes of ICON resin infiltration system is better than Adper Single Bond 2 adhesive system.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to assess and compare the dentin tubule penetration effectiveness of a dental adhesive and a resin infiltration system used with two different surface treatments.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Dentin specimens were obtained from 42 impacted lower right wisdom tooth, 2 of these specimens were used to detect the effects of surface treatments.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: According to the results of this study, it can be concluded that tubuler penetration effectivenes of ICON resin infiltration system is better than Adper Single Bond 2 adhesive system.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:dentin sensitivity · resins · adhesives

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess and compare the dentin tubule penetration effectiveness of a dental adhesive and a resin infiltration system used with two different surface treatments. Methods: Dentin specimens were obtained from 42 impacted lower right wisdom tooth, 2 of these specimens were used to detect the effects of surface treatments. Two different surface treatments (37% phosphoric acid and 17% EDTA) were applied to the samples to compare the dentin tubule penetration effectiveness of a dental adhesive –which had been using for treatment of dentin hypersensitivity- (Adper Single Bond 2, 3M, Germany) and a resin infiltration system (ICON, DMG, Germany). Scanning electron microscopy was used to investigate the tubule penetration effectiveness. For statistical analysis, Kruskal Wallis and Mann Whitney U and One Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Tukey HSD tests were used.Results: ICON had shown significantly more resin penetration intensity and more resin penetration depth than Adper Single Bond 2 (p<0.05). Phosphoric acid treatment groups had shown significantly more penetration intensity than EDTA treated groups (p=0.001). Conclusion: According to the results of this study, it can be concluded that tubuler penetration effectivenes of ICON resin infiltration system is better than Adper Single Bond 2 adhesive system.

🔖

Cite This Article

OZYURT, E., ARİSU, H. D., TURKOZ, E. (2019). In Vitro Comparison of the Effectiveness of a Resin Infiltration System and a Dental Adhesive System in Dentinal Tubule Penetration. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3, 253–260. https://ajindex.com/articles/481627

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Addy M. Dentine hypersensitivity: new perspectives on an old problem. International Dental Journal. 2002;52(5):367-75
  2. Addy M, Dowell P. Dentine hypersensitivity--a review. Clinical and in vitro evaluation of treatment agents. J Clin Periodontol. 1983;10(4):351-63
  3. Canadian Advisory Board on Dentin H. Consensus-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of dentin hypersensitivity. J Can Dent Assoc. 2003;69(4):221-6
  4. Pashley DH. How can sensitive dentine become hypersensitive and can it be reversed? Journal of Dentistry. 2013;41:S49-S55
  5. Porto IC, Andrade AK, Montes MA. Diagnosis and treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity. J Oral Sci. 2009;51(3):323-32
  6. Addy M, Pearce N. Aetiological, predisposing and environmental factors in dentine hypersensitivity. Arch Oral Biol. 1994;39 Suppl:33S-8S 7. KEMALOĞLU H, TÜRKÜN LŞ. Dentin Hypersensitivity-Physiology Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Restorative Dentistry-Special Topics. 2015;1(1):8-15
  7. Bamise CT, Esan TA. Mechanisms and treatment approaches of dentine hypersensitivity: a literature review. Oral health & preventive dentistry. 2011;9(4)
  8. Yilmaz HG, Bayindir H, Cengiz E, Berberoglu A. Dentin hypersensitivity and treatment methods Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. 2012;15(1):71-82
  9. Orchardson R, Gillam DG. Managing dentin hypersensitivity. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006;137(7):990-8; quiz 1028-9
  10. Bartold PM. Dentinal hypersensitivity: a review. Aust Dent J. 2006;51(3):212-8; quiz 76
  11. Corona SAM, Do Nascimento TN, Catirse ABE, Lizarelli RFZ, Dinelli W, Palma-DIBB RG. Clinical evaluation of low-level laser therapy and fluoride varnish for treating cervical dentinal hypersensitivity. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2003;30(12):1183-9
  12. Markowitz K, Pashley DH. Discovering new treatments for sensitive teeth: the long path from biology to therapy. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2008;35(4):300-15
  13. Askar H, Lausch J, Dorfer CE, Meyer-Lueckel H, Paris S. Penetration of micro-filled infiltrant resins into artificial caries lesions. Journal of Dentistry. 2015;43(7):832-8
  14. Gelani R, Zandona AF, Lippert F, Kamocka MM, Eckert G. In Vitro Progression of Artificial White Spot Lesions Sealed With an Infiltrant Resin. Oper Dent. 2014;39(5):481-8
  15. Cal-Neto JP, de Miranda MS, Dias KR. Comparative SEM evaluation of penetration of adhesive systems in human dentin with a non-rinse conditioner and a self-etching primer. Braz Dent J. 2004;15(1):19-25
  16. Moradi S, Ghoddusi J, Forghani M. Eva