Journals / Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2

The Relationship Between Fat Tissue & Lean Body Mass and Sit to Stand Task in Obese Individuals

Pages
191–295
Publication Date
2021-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Improving LBM and decreasing FTM would be an effective strategy to improve STS in the obese population to increase their agility and could encourage physical activity participation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Obesity, currently one of the important health issues, can be defined through Fat Tissue Mass (FTM) and Lean Body Mass (LBM).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study aimed to investigate to what extent do FTM and LBM are associated with movement strategies of Sit-to-Stand (STS) task in individuals with obesity.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Improving LBM and decreasing FTM would be an effective strategy to improve STS in the obese population to increase their agility and could encourage physical activity participation.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:obesity · fat tissue mass · lean body mass

Abstract

Objective: Obesity, currently one of the important health issues, can be defined through Fat Tissue Mass (FTM) and Lean Body Mass (LBM). The study aimed to investigate to what extent do FTM and LBM are associated with movement strategies of Sit-to-Stand (STS) task in individuals with obesity. Methods: Forty-nine obese individuals (52,83 ± 7,39) with no diagnosis of any health condition included in the study. The Balance Master System was used to evaluate the STS movement. STS task was analyzed by means of Weight Transfer Time (WTT) (second), Rising Index (RI) (force exerted by legs-%Body Weight), the Center of Gravity (COG) sway velocity (degrees per second). The FTM and LBM were regressed against each STS parameter including age as a covariate. Results: The regression models could explain 10-21% of the variabilities in STS parameters: RI (21%), COG sway velocity (11%), WTT (10%). FTM significantly related to RI (β: – 0.287, p=0.040), but not with COG sway velocity (β: 0.270, p=0.073) and WTT (β: – 0.038, p=0.802). LBM was significantly associated with RI (β: 0.435, p=0.003); yet, not with COG sway velocity (β: – 0.100, p=0.066), WTT (β: – 0.092, p=0.549). Conclusion: This study revealed that FTM and LBM can explain the significant percent of the variation in RI during STS task, meaning a decrease in FTM and an increase in LBM provided support to rise during STS task. Moreover, an increase in FTM deteriorated postural stability. Improving LBM and decreasing FTM would be an effective strategy to improve STS in the obese population to increase their agility and could encourage physical activity participation.

🔖

Cite This Article

TİMURTAŞ, E., AVCI, E. E., DEMİRBÜKEN, İ., AKGÜN, İ., SERTBAŞ, Y., POLAT, M. G. (2021). The Relationship Between Fat Tissue & Lean Body Mass and Sit to Stand Task in Obese Individuals. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2, 191–295. https://ajindex.com/articles/481591

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Referans 1. WHO. Obesity and overweight. 2020 April 1. Available from: URL: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight. Referans 2. Finkelstein EA, Khavjou OA, Thompson H, Trogdon JG, Pan L, Sherry B, Dietz, W. Obesity and severe obesity forecasts through 2030. American journal of preventive medicine 2012
  2. 42(6): 563-570. Referans 3. Kejonen P, Kauranen K, Vanharanta H. The relationship between anthropometric factors and body-balancing movements in postural balance. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003
  3. Referans 4. Ledin T. Odkvist LM. Effects of increased inertial load in dynamic and randomized perturbed posturography. Acta Otolaryngol 1993
  4. Referans 5. McGraw B, McClenaghan BA, Williams HG, Dickerson J. Gait and postural stability in obese and nonobese prepubertal boys. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000
  5. Referans 6. Zoico E, Di Francesco V, Guralnik JM, Mazzali G, Bortolani A, Guariento S, Sergi G, Bosello O, Zamboni M. Physical disability and muscular strength in relation to obesity and different body composition indexes in a sample of healthy elderly women. Int J Obes 2004
  6. 28(2): 234-241. Referans 7. Wearing SC, Hennig EM, Byrne NM, Steele JR, Hills AP. The biomechanics of restricted movement in adult obesity. Obes Rev 2006
  7. 7(1):13-24. Referans 8. Lustig JR, Strauss BJG. Body Composition. Caballero B, editor. Encyclopedia of Food Sciences and Nutrition (Second Edition). USA: Academic Press
  8. p.550-557. Referans 9. Dall PM, Kerr A. Frequency of sit to stand task: an observational study of free-living adults. Appl Ergon 2010
  9. 41(1): 58–61. Referans 10. Özyürek S, Demirbüken İ, Angın S. Altered movement strategies in sit-to-stand task in persons with transtibial amputation. Prosthet Orthot Int 2014
  10. 38(4):303-309. Referans 11. Del Porto H, Pechak C, Smith D. Reed-Jones R Biomechanical effects of obesity on balance Invited Review. Int J Exerc Sci 2012
  11. 5(4): 301-320. Referans 12. Deforche BI, Hills AP, Worringham CJ, Davies PS, Murphy AJ, Bouckaert JJ, De Bourdeaudhuij IM. Balance and postural skills in normal-weight and overweight prepubertal boys. Int J Pediatr Obes 2009
  12. 4(3):175-182. Referans 13. Sibella F, Galli M, Romei M, Montesano A, Crivellini M. Biomechanical analysis of sit-to-stand movement in normal and obese subjects. Clin Biomech 2003
  13. 745–750. Referans 14. Galli M, Crivellini M, Sibella F, Montesano A, Bertocco P, Parisio C. Sit-to-stand movement analysis in obese subjects. Int J Obes Re