Journals / Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences / 2020 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1

Usability of Mobile Health Application for Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Clinicians

Pages
54–59
Publication Date
2020-03-24
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

When compared between devices for two groups, exercise platform delivered through smartphone performed better on usability than smartwatch for both individuals with T2DM and clinicians.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Usability of technological devices is an important and relevant construct as mobile technologies are increasingly used to deliver healthcare products.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this study is to compare the usability of smartphone and smartwatch devices in delivering an exercise platform to individuals with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) among two focus groups: individuals with T2DM and clinicians.Methods: A total of 40 individuals with T2DM (focus group 1) and 20 clinicians (focus group 2) were recruited to use the platforms one week.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:When compared between devices for two groups, exercise platform delivered through smartphone performed better on usability than smartwatch for both individuals with T2DM and clinicians.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus · Mobile Health · Smartphone

Abstract

Objective: Usability of technological devices is an important and relevant construct as mobile technologies are increasingly used to deliver healthcare products. Most accessible devices are smartphone and smartwatch but information on their usability is scarce. The aim of this study is to compare the usability of smartphone and smartwatch devices in delivering an exercise platform to individuals with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) among two focus groups: individuals with T2DM and clinicians.Methods: A total of 40 individuals with T2DM (focus group 1) and 20 clinicians (focus group 2) were recruited to use the platforms one week. Each focus group was randomly divided into: smartphone and smartwatch groups. Each participant was provided with a practice trial for a week before data collection. Usability of both devices was measured with System Usability Scale (SUS). Student t-test was used to compare the total and subscale scores of SUS between two devices in each focus group.Results: In focus group 1 and 2, the mean total scores of SUS were slightly higher in smartphone group (88,75 9,34 and 86,75 8,68 ) than smartwatch group (87,87 7.56 and 82,35 6,59) respectively. When compared to individual items, three items were statistically significant in focus group 1 and one in focus group 2 (p 0.05).Conclusion:This study demonstrates a high usability (SUS score>80,8) for both smartphone and smartwatch devices in individuals with T2DM and clinicians. When compared between devices for two groups, exercise platform delivered through smartphone performed better on usability than smartwatch for both individuals with T2DM and clinicians.

🔖

Cite This Article

TİMURTAŞ, E., POLAT, M. G. (2020). Usability of Mobile Health Application for Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Clinicians. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1, 54–59. https://ajindex.com/articles/481580

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Referans1. Cho, N., et al., IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2017 and projections for 2045. Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2018. 138: p. 271-281. Referans2. Davies, M.J., et al., Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes, 2018. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetologia, 2018. 61(12): p. 2461-2498. Referans3. Colberg, S.R., et al., Physical activity/exercise and diabetes: a position statement of the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes care, 2016. 39(11): p. 2065-2079. Referans4. Morrato, E.H., et al., Physical activity in US adults with diabetes and at risk for developing diabetes, 2003. Diabetes care, 2007. 30(2): p. 203-209. Referans5. Hunt, C.W., Technology and diabetes self-management: an integrative review. World journal of diabetes, 2015. 6(2): p. 225. Referans6. Sanders, J.P., et al., Devices for self-monitoring sedentary time or physical activity: a scoping review. Journal of medical Internet research, 2016. 18(5): p. e90. Referans7. Shah, V.N. and S.K. Garg, Managing diabetes in the digital age. Clinical Diabetes and Endocrinology, 2015. 1(1): p. 16. Referans8. Schoeppe, S., et al., Efficacy of interventions that use apps to improve diet, physical activity and sedentary behaviour: a systematic review. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2016. 13(1): p. 127. Referans9. Bonoto, B.C., et al., Efficacy of mobile apps to support the care of patients with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2017. 5(3): p. e4. Referans10. Georgsson, M., N. Staggers, and C. Weir, A modified user-oriented heuristic evaluation of a mobile health system for diabetes self-management support. Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 2016. 34(2): p. 77. Referans11. Hussain, A., E.O. Mkpojiogu, and F.M. Kamal. Eliciting user satisfying requirements for an e-health awareness system using kano model. in 14th International Conference On Applied Computer And Applied Computational Science (ACACOS'15), Kuala Lumpur. 2015. Referans12. Veazie, S., et al., Mobile applications for self-management of diabetes. 2018. Referans13. Årsand, E., et al., Performance of the first combined smartwatch and smartphone diabetes diary application study. Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2015. 9(3): p. 556-563. Referans14. Reeder, B. and A. David,