SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences / 2022 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1

Evaluation of Mother-Infant Bonding Status of High-Risk Pregnant Women and Related Factors

Aysel TOPAN
Tülay KUZLU AYYILDIZ
Derya SAHİN
Şeyma KİLCİ ERCİYAS
Fatma GULTEKİN
Pages
26–31
Publication Date
2022-03-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found that PBI scores of women whowillingly got pregnant and became happy when they learned that they were pregnant were statistically significantly high.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This descriptive study was conducted to determine the prenatal mother-infant bonding levels of high-risk pregnant women andrelated factors.Method: A questionnaire was applied to 351 risky pregnant women in a public hospital between 1st August-1st October 2015.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data were analyzed with SPSS 16.0 statisticalprogram.Results: There was no significant relationship between the number of pregnancies and PBI scores.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found that PBI scores of women whowillingly got pregnant and became happy when they learned that they were pregnant were statistically significantly high.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:prenatal bonding · pregnancy · relevant factors

Abstract

Objective: This descriptive study was conducted to determine the prenatal mother-infant bonding levels of high-risk pregnant women andrelated factors.Method: A questionnaire was applied to 351 risky pregnant women in a public hospital between 1st August-1st October 2015. Sociodemographicfeatures and Prenatal Bonding Inventory (PBI) scale were included in this form. Data were analyzed with SPSS 16.0 statisticalprogram.Results: There was no significant relationship between the number of pregnancies and PBI scores. It was found that PBI scores of women whowillingly got pregnant and became happy when they learned that they were pregnant were statistically significantly high. It was ascertained thatmean PBI scores of pregnant women having a planned pregnancy, not intending to terminate, feeling baby movements, and having the desireto see a doctor except for routine controls were significantly high.Conclusion: The number of pregnancies, the willingness of pregnancy, planned pregnancy, thought of termination of pregnancy, the feeling ofbaby movements, and desire to see a doctor except for routine controls affected the mother-baby bonding.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOPAN, A., AYYILDIZ, T. K., SAHİN, D., ERCİYAS, Ş. K., GULTEKİN, F. (2022). Evaluation of Mother-Infant Bonding Status of High-Risk Pregnant Women and Related Factors. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1, 26–31. https://ajindex.com/articles/481352

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Oskay ÜY. Nursıng care in high risk pregnancy. Journal of Perinatology 2004;12:11-16.
  2. Shin HS, Kim JH. Music therapy on anxiety, stress and maternalfetal attachment in pregnant women during transvaginal ultrasound. Asian Nursing Research 2011;5:19-27. Erdoğan A. Father’s role in child’s psychosocial development. New Symposium 2004;42:147-153. Røhder K, Væver MS, Aarestrup AK, Jacobsen RK, Smith-Nielsen J, Schiøtz ML. Maternal-fetal bonding among pregnant women at psychosocial risk: The roles of adult attachment style, prenatal parental reflective functioning, and depressive symptoms. PLoS One 2020;15(9):e0239208. Arslan H, Korkmaz N. The physical and psychological problems of hospitalized high-risk pregnant women in partial bed rest. Journal of Perinatology 2005;13:1-11.
  3. McNamara J, Townsend ML, Herbert JS. A systemic review of maternal wellbeing and its relationship with maternal fetal attachment and early postpartum bonding. PLoS One 2019;14:e0220032. Hsu TL, Chen CH. Stress and maternal-fetal attachment of pregnant women during their third trimester. Kaohsiung J. Med Sci 2001;17:36–45.
  4. Kesebir S, Kavzoğlu SÖ, Üstündağ MF. Attachment and psychopathology. Current Approaches in Psychiatry 2011;3:321-342. Yılmaz DS. Prenatal mother-baby attachment. Journal of Education Research in Nursing 2013;10:28-33. Bowlby J. Attachment and Loss: V.1. Attachment. 2nd ed., New York: Basic Books; 1982. Muller ME. Development of the prenatal attachment inventory. WJNR 1993;15:199-215.
  5. Duyan V, Kapısız SG, Yakut HI. Adaptation of the prenatal attachment inventory to Turkish on a group of pregnant women. JOGNN 2013;10:1609-1614.
  6. Pisoni C, Garofoli F, Tzialla C, Orcesi S, Spinillo A, Politi P, Balottin U, Tinelli C, Stronati M. Complexity of parental prenatal attachment during pregnancy at risk for preterm delivery. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal&Neonatal Medicine 2016;29:771-776.
  7. Kartal YA, Karaman T. Prenatal attachment and depression over pregnant women in pregnancy preparation education. Zeynep Kâmil Medical Bulletin 2018;49:85-91. Havutçu G. Effect of High-risk pregnancies on prenatal attachment. Aydın Adnan Menderes University. Institute of Health Sciences, Master Thesis 2019.
  8. Akarsu RH, Oskay Ü. Information about the danger symptoms of high-risk pregnant women and determination of prenatal attachment levels. Journal of Ege University Nursing Faculty 2017;33:16-26.
  9. Lingesvaran A, Bindu H. Validation of tamil version of cranley’s 24-item maternal fetal attachment scale in