Journals / Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3

Microleakage and Marginal Integrity of Direct and Indirect Composite Resin Restorations in MOD Cavities After Thermo-Mechanical Loading

Pages
564–574
Publication Date
2021-09-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Under the limitation of this in vitro study; restoring MOD cavities using different matrix structures of the composites could not eliminate the leakage at the gingival seat under CEJ.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this in vitro study is to compare the microleakage of mesial-occlusal-distal (MOD) composite resin restorations made by using CAD/CAM block and methacrylate/ormocer-based direct resin composites after thermo-mechanical loading.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Standard 40 noncarious human third mandibular molars were selected for the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Under the limitation of this in vitro study; restoring MOD cavities using different matrix structures of the composites could not eliminate the leakage at the gingival seat under CEJ.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:CAD/CAM · chewing simulator · microleakage

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this in vitro study is to compare the microleakage of mesial-occlusal-distal (MOD) composite resin restorations made by using CAD/CAM block and methacrylate/ormocer-based direct resin composites after thermo-mechanical loading. Methods: Standard 40 noncarious human third mandibular molars were selected for the study. Standardized MOD (3x4x2mm) cavities were prepared on the mesial and distal sides. The gingival margin was placed above the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) on the mesial side and below the CEJ on the distal side. The prepared samples were divided into three experimental groups [indirect group-GrandioBlock (GB), direct-methacrylate group-TetricN-Ceram+TetricN-Flow (T+TF), direct-ormocer group-Admira Fusion+Admira Fusion Flow (A+AF)] and control group [direct-methacrylate group-GrandioSo+GrandioSoFlow (G+GF)] (n=10). After finishing restorations samples were subjected to 50 N to 240.000 thermo-mechanical cycles (5-55°C, for 60 sec) and kept in 0.2% methylene blue. Samples sectioned longitudinally in the mesiodistal direction with a precision cutting device were examined under stereomicroscope at X8 and X25 and microleakage values were scored. In the evaluation of the data, descriptive statistical methods as well as the chi-square test was used for the comparison of qualitative data. Results: No significant difference was found among the coronal and gingival-enamel microleakage distributions of the groups (p>0.05). A statistically significant difference was observed among the gingival-cementum microleakage distributions of the groups (p=0.003). The distribution of gingival-cement microleakage with the no dye penetration score in the T+TF group was found to be statistically significantly lower than the G+GF and GB groups (p = 0.010, p = 0.001). Conclusion: Under the limitation of this in vitro study; restoring MOD cavities using different matrix structures of the composites could not eliminate the leakage at the gingival seat under CEJ.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞENOL, A. A., ATALI, P. Y., KAHRAMANOĞLU, E. (2021). Microleakage and Marginal Integrity of Direct and Indirect Composite Resin Restorations in MOD Cavities After Thermo-Mechanical Loading. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3, 564–574. https://ajindex.com/articles/481256

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Ástvaldsdóttir Á, Dagerhamn J, van Dijken JW, Naimi-Akbar A, Sandborgh-Englund G, Tranæus S, Nilsson M. Longevity of posterior resin composite restorations in adults – A systematic review. J Dent 2015
  2. 43(8):934-954. [2] Moraschini V, Fai CK, Alto RM, Dos Santos GO. Amalgam and resin composite longevity of posterior restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 2015
  3. 43(9):1043-1050. [3] Kruly PC, Giannini M, Pascotto RC, Tokubo LM, Suga USG, Marques ACR, Terada RSS. Meta-analysis of the clinical behavior of posterior direct resin restorations: Low polymerization shrinkage resin in comparison to methacrylate composite resin. PLoS One 2018
  4. 13(2):e0191942. [4] Reddy SN, Jayashankar DN, Nainan M, Shivanna V. The effect of flowable composite lining thickness with various curing techniques on microleakage in class II composite restorations: an in vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013
  5. 14(1):56-60. [5] Lokhande NA, Padmai AS, Rathore VP, Shingane S, Jayashankar DN, Sharma U. Effectiveness of flowable resin composite in reducing microleakage - an in vitro study. J Int Oral Health 2014
  6. 6(3):111-114. [6] Randolph LD, Palin WM, Leprince JG. Composition of dental resin-based composites for direct restorations. In: Miletic V, Eds. Dental Composite Materials for Direct Restorations. Belgrade: Springer International Publishing
  7. p.11–24. [7] Stawarczyk B, Liebermann A, Eichberger M, Güth JF. Evaluation of mechanical and optical behavior of current esthetic dental restorative CAD/CAM composites. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2015
  8. Wendler M, Belli R, Petschelt A, Mevec D, Harrer W, Lube T, Danzer R, Lohbauer U. Chairside CAD/CAM materials. Part 2: Flexural strength testing. Dent Mater 2017
  9. 33(1):99-109. [9] Park SH, Yoo YJ, Shin YJ, Cho BH, Baek SH. Marginal and internal fit of nano-composite CAD/CAM restorations. Restor Dent Endod 2016
  10. 41(1):37-43. [10] Opdam N, Frankenberger R, Magne P. From 'Direct versus indirect' toward an integrated restorative concept in the posterior dentition. Oper Dent 2016
  11. 41(S7):27-34. [11] Hickel R, Peschke A, Tyas M, Mjör I, Bayne S, Peters M, Hiller KA, Randall R, Vanherle G, Heintze SD. FDI World Dental Federation - clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations. Update and clinical examples. J Adhes Dent 2010
  12. 12(4):259-272. [12] Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, Hickel R. Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the