SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3

THE EFFECT OF PH-CYCLING AND TOOTHBRUSHING SIMULATIONS ON SURFACE ROUGHNESS OF BULK-FILL COMPOSITES

Tuğba MİSİLLİ
Nihan GONULOL
Özge Gizem CABADAĞ
Lena ALMASIFAR
Derya DİNÇ
Pages
487–494
Publication Date
2021-09-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The values were analyzed by two-way ANOVA with repeated measures on one factor (period) followed by Tukey’s test (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:ABSTRACT Objective: This study aimed to compare surface roughness values (Ra) of different posterior composites after pH-cycling and toothbrushing simulation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Fifty disc-shaped specimens (8x2 mm) were prepared by using three bulk-fill composites [Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior (FBF), SonicFill (SF), X-tra fil (XF)], a flowable [G-aenial Universal Flo (GF)], and a microhybrid composite [Filtek Z250 (Z250)].
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The values were analyzed by two-way ANOVA with repeated measures on one factor (period) followed by Tukey’s test (p
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:pH-cycling · bulk fill composites · surface roughness

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: This study aimed to compare surface roughness values (Ra) of different posterior composites after pH-cycling and toothbrushing simulation. Methods: Fifty disc-shaped specimens (8x2 mm) were prepared by using three bulk-fill composites [Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior (FBF), SonicFill (SF), X-tra fil (XF)], a flowable [G-aenial Universal Flo (GF)], and a microhybrid composite [Filtek Z250 (Z250)]. After initial roughness (Ra0) measurements were performed with a contact profilometer, the samples were subjected to a pH-cycling model for 10 days and Ra1 values were recorded. Then, the samples were subjected to toothbrushing simulation for 4 min and final values (Ra2) were recorded. From each group, a representative sample was analyzed with an optical profilometer. The values were analyzed by two-way ANOVA with repeated measures on one factor (period) followed by Tukey’s test (p

🔖

Cite This Article

MİSİLLİ, T., GONULOL, N., CABADAĞ, Ö. G., ALMASIFAR, L., DİNÇ, D. (2021). THE EFFECT OF PH-CYCLING AND TOOTHBRUSHING SIMULATIONS ON SURFACE ROUGHNESS OF BULK-FILL COMPOSITES. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3, 487–494. https://ajindex.com/articles/481245

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Yap AU, Low JS, Ong LF. Effect of food simulating liquids on surface characteristics of composite and polyacid-modified composite restoratives. Oper Dent 2000; 25: 170-176.
  2. Kim RJ, Kim YJ, Choi NS, Lee IB. Polymerization shrinkage, modulus, and shrinkage stress related to tooth-restoration interfacial debonding in bulk-fill composites. J Dent 2015; 43: 430-439.
  3. Ilie N, Bucuta S, Draenert M. Bulk-fill resin based composites: an in vitro assessment of their mechanical performance. Oper Dent 2013; 38: 618-625.
  4. Karadaş M, Demirbuğa S. Evaluation of color stability and surface roughness of bulk-fill resin composites and nanocomposites. Meandros Med Dent J 2017; 18: 199-206. de Brito O, de Oliveira I, Monteiro G. Hydrolytic and biological degradation of bulk-fill and self-adhering resin composites. Oper Dent 2019; 44: E223-233. Sahadi BO, Price RB, André CB, Sebold M, Bermejo GN, Palma-Dibb RG, Faraoni JJ, Soares CJ, Giannini M. Multiple-peak and single-peak dental curing lights comparison on the wear resistance of bulk-fill composites. BOR 2018; 32: e122. Al-Qahtani K, Al Bounni RS, Omari MA, Assery M. Wear and surface roughness of three different composite resins after simulated toothbrushing: an in vitro study. Int J Oral Care Res 2017; 5: 137-142.
  5. Anusavice KJ, Shen C, Rawls HR. Phillips' science of dental materials. 12th Ed., St. Louis, MO: Elsevier/Saunders 2013.p.275-306. GC Corporation. G-aenial Universal Flo brochure – (cited 2019 Jan 8). Available from: http://www.gcamerica.com/products/operatory/G-aenialFlowable/GCA_G-aenial_Bro-iPad.pdf.
  6. Lai G, Zhao L, Wang J, Kunzelmann KH. Surface properties and color stability of dental flowable composites influenced by simulated toothbrushing. Dent Mater J 2018; 37: 717-724.
  7. Lazaridou D, Belli R, Petschelt A, Lohbauer, U. Are resin composites suitable replacements for amalgam? A study of two-body wear. Clin Oral Investig 2015; 19: 1485-1492.
  8. Ferracane JL, Marker VA. Solvent degradation and reduced fracture toughness in aged composites. J Dent Res 1992; 71: 13-19.
  9. Yap AU, Tan SH, Wee SS, Lee CW, Lim EL, Zeng KY. Chemical degradation of composite restoratives. J Oral Rehabil 2001; 28: 1015-1021. Fúcıo SB, Carvalho FG, Sobrinho LC, Sinhoreti MA, Puppin-Rontani RM. The influence of 30-day-old Streptococcus mutans biofilm on the surface of esthetic restorative materials-An in vitro study. J Dent 2008; 36: 833-839.
  10. Söderholm KJ, Richards ND. Wear resistance of composites: a solved problem? Gen Dent 1998; 46: 256-263. V