Journals / Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3

Effect of Disposable Sheaths on the Vickers Microhardness of Resin Composites

Pages
393–398
Publication Date
2021-09-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: According to the 1st-hour data from the top and bottom SMH measurements, EL and VL groups gave significantly higher microhardness values than VLS and ELS groups (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of disposable sheaths on microhardness of resin composites.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: A total of 40 resin composite specimens were fabricated with perspex molds (5x2 mm).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: According to the 1st-hour data from the top and bottom SMH measurements, EL and VL groups gave significantly higher microhardness values than VLS and ELS groups (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Dental Curing Lights · Hardness · Composite Resins

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of disposable sheaths on microhardness of resin composites. Methods: A total of 40 resin composite specimens were fabricated with perspex molds (5x2 mm). Specimens were divided into 4 groups: Irradiated by 1-Elipar LCU only (EL), 2-Elipar LCU with sheath (ELS), 3-Valo LCU only (VL), 4-Valo LCU with sheath (VLS), (n=10). The specimens were subjected to surface microhardness (SMH) test (Tronic, Digital Microhardness Tester DHV-1000) on the top and bottom surfaces under 200 g load applied for 10 s with a Vickers indenter. The specimens were stored in the distilled water at 37 °C for 24 hours and the same measurements were repeated. One-way ANOVA test, Tukey and Tamhane post-hoc tests were used for intergroup comparisons. Also paired sample t-test was used for comparisons of the different time results. Results: According to the 1st-hour data from the top and bottom SMH measurements, EL and VL groups gave significantly higher microhardness values than VLS and ELS groups (p

🔖

Cite This Article

ATAY, M. T., DİNDAR, M. B., OZVEREN, N. (2021). Effect of Disposable Sheaths on the Vickers Microhardness of Resin Composites. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3, 393–398. https://ajindex.com/articles/481231

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Rode K, Kawano Y, Turbino M. Evaluation of curing light distance on resin composite microhardness and polymerization. Oper Dent. 2007; 32:571-578
  2. David JR, Gomes OM, Gomes JC, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Effect of exposure time on curing efficiency of polymerizing units equipped with light-emitting diodes. J Oral Sci. 2007; 49:19-24
  3. Jeong T-S, Kang H-S, Kim S-K, Kim S, Kim H-I, Kwon YH. The effect of resin shades on microhardness, polymerization shrinkage, and color change of dental composite resins. Dent Mater J. 2009; 28:438-445
  4. Yoon TH, Lee YK, Lim BS, Kim CW. Degree of polymerization of resin composites by different light sources. J Oral Rehabil. 2002; 29:1165-1173
  5. Fan P, Schumacher RM, Azzolin K, Geary R, Eichmiller FC. Curing-light intensity and depth of cure of resin-based composites tested according to international standards. J Am Dent Assoc. 2002; 133:429-434
  6. Chong S, Lam Y, Lee F, Ramalingam L, Yeo A, Lim C. Effect of various infection control methods for light-cure units on the cure of composite resins. Oper Dent. 1998; 23:150-154
  7. Warren DP, Rice H, Powers J. Intensity of curing lights affected by barriers. J Dent Hyg. 2000; 74:20-23
  8. Autio KL, Rosen S, Reynolds NJ, Bright JS. Studies on cross-contamination in the dental clinic. J Am Dent Assoc. 1980; 100:358-361
  9. Caughman GB, Caughman WF, Napier N, Schuster G. Disinfection of visible-lightcuring devices. Oper Dent. 1989; 14:2-7
  10. Rueggeberg FA, Caughman WF, Comer RW. The effect of autoclaving on energy transmission through light-curing tips. J Am Dent Assoc. 1996; 127:1183-1187
  11. Rueggeberg F, Caughman WF. Factors affecting light transmission of single-use, plastic light-curing tips. Oper Dent. 1998; 23:179-184
  12. Scott BA, Felix CA, Price RB. Effect of disposable infection control barriers on light output from dental curing lights. J Can Dent Assoc. 2004; 70:105-110
  13. Nelson SK, Caughman WF, Rueggeberg FA, Lockwood PE. Effect of glutaraldehyde cold sterilants on light transmission of curing tips. Quintessence Int. 1997; 28:725-730
  14. Pollington S, Kahakachchi N, van Noort R. The influence of plastic light cure sheaths on the hardness of resin composite. Oper Dent. 2009; 34:741-745
  15. Hodson NA, Dunne SM, Pankhurst CL. The effect of infection-control barriers on the light intensity of light-cure units and depth of cure of composite. Prim Dent Care. 2005; 12:61-67
  16. Kurachi C, Tuboy AM, Magalhães DV, Bagnato VS. Hardness evaluation of a dental compos