Journals / Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences / 2022 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1

Time Difference Between Onsets of Lateral and Medial Hamstring Muscles During Gait in Patients With Patellofemoral Pain: A Preliminary Study

Pages
192–197
Publication Date
2022-03-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that LH displayed an earlier activation in subjects with PFP compared to control subjects during gait.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Early activation of lateral hamstrings (LH) relative to medial hamstrings (MH) has been thought to be the cause of abnormal knee abduction and external rotation of the tibia, which affects the orientation of patellar tendon and increases lateral patellofemoral compression.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Thirteen patients with bilateral PFP (mean age 28.73±7.44 years) and 13 asymptomatic subjects (mean age 30.47±6.22 years) were recruited in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Our findings suggest that LH displayed an earlier activation in subjects with PFP compared to control subjects during gait.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Hamstrings · Surface EMG · Patellofemoral Pain

Abstract

Objective: Early activation of lateral hamstrings (LH) relative to medial hamstrings (MH) has been thought to be the cause of abnormal knee abduction and external rotation of the tibia, which affects the orientation of patellar tendon and increases lateral patellofemoral compression. Therefore, early activation of LH relative to MH is considered to have a role in the patellofemoral pain (PFP). The aim of this study was to investigate the time difference between MH and LH onsets in patients with PFP during gait. Methods: Thirteen patients with bilateral PFP (mean age 28.73±7.44 years) and 13 asymptomatic subjects (mean age 30.47±6.22 years) were recruited in the study. Gait analysis was performed using the ELITE system (BTS, Milano-Italy) with video cameras (TVC, BTS, Milano-Italy). Participants were requested to walk at a self-selected speed on a force platform, and EMG data were recorded from MH and LH muscles for 10 initial contacts by using TELEEMG (BTS, Milano-Italy). Time difference between the onsets of the MH and LH was calculated for each initial contact by using moving averaging method, then their mean was obtained for each participant. Results: The time difference between onsets of MH and LH was – 26.9±22.2 ms for PFP subjects and – 11.2±14.2 ms for control subjects, and LH mainly became activated earlier compared to MH in most of the subjects in both groups. There was a statistically significant difference between the time differences of the groups (p=0.041). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that LH displayed an earlier activation in subjects with PFP compared to control subjects during gait.

🔖

Cite This Article

COŞKUNSU, D. K., CAN, F., KUCHIMOV, S., AKALAN, N. E., KILIÇOĞLU, Ö., ÖZTÜRK, N. (2022). Time Difference Between Onsets of Lateral and Medial Hamstring Muscles During Gait in Patients With Patellofemoral Pain: A Preliminary Study. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1, 192–197. https://ajindex.com/articles/481174

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Powers CM, Witvrouw E, Davis IS. Evidence-based framework for a pathomechanical model of patellofemoral pain: 2017 patellofemoral pain consensus statement from the 4th International Patellofemoral Pain Research Retreat, Manchester, UK: part 3. Br J Sports Med 2017; 51:1713–1723
  2. Bolgla, L. A., Malone, T. R., Umberger, B. R., Uhl, T. L. Comparison of hip and knee strength and neuromuscular activity in subjects with and without patellofemoral pain syndrome. International journal of sports physical therapy, 2011; 6(4):285
  3. Chester, R., Smith, T. O., Sweeting, D., Dixon, J., Wood, S., Song, F. The relative timing of VMO and VL in the aetiology of anterior knee pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2008; 9(1):64
  4. Souza RB, Powers CM. Differences in hip kinematics, muscle strength, and muscle activation between subjects with and without patellofemoral pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009;39(1):12-19
  5. Brindle TJ, Mattacola CG, McCrory JL. Electromyographic changes in the gluteus medius during stair ascent and descent in subjects with anterior knee pain. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2003; 11:244-251
  6. Cowan SM, Crossley KM, Bennell KL. Altered hip and trunk muscle function in individuals with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Br J Sports Med. 2009; 43:584-588
  7. Patil S, Dixon J, White LC, Jones AP, Hui AC. An electromyographic exploratory study comparing the difference in the onset of hamstring and quadriceps contraction in patients with anterior knee pain. Knee 2011; 18(5):329-332
  8. Dieter BP, McGowan CP, Stoll SK, Vella CA. Muscle activation patterns and patellofemoral pain in cyclists. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2014 Apr 1;46(4):753-756
  9. Liebensteiner M.C., Szubski C., Raschner C., Krismer M., Burtscher M., Platzer HP., Deibl M., Dirnberger E. Frontal plane leg alignment and muscular activity during maximum eccentric contractions in individuals with and without patellofemoral pain syndrome. Knee 2008; 15: 180–186
  10. Li G., DeFrate L.E., Zayontz S., Park S.E., Gill T.J. The effect of tibiofemoral joint kinematics on patellofemoral contact pressures under simulated muscle loads Journal of Orthopaedic Research 2004; 22 (4): 801-806
  11. Kumagai M, Mizuno Y, Mattessich SM, Elias JJ, Cosgarea AJ, Chao AJ. Posterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture Alters in Vitro Knee Kinematics Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002; 395:241-248
  12. Elias JJ, Kirkpatrick MS, Saranathan A, Mani S, Smith LG,