SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences / 2022 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 3

Interventions Preventing Osteoporosis in Primary Care: A Systematic Review

Selma BAZ
Aynur UYSAL TORAMAN
Pages
772–782
Publication Date
2022-09-28
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Compared to the control groups, it was found that the participants’ osteoporosis knowledge increased significantly (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review to find interventions in primary health care that would increase osteoporosis prevention behaviors.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Systematic searches of CINAHL, Eric, Medline complete, PsycInfo, Ovid, Web of Science, Cochrane Library (N=1270).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Compared to the control groups, it was found that the participants’ osteoporosis knowledge increased significantly (p
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Intervention · osteoporosis · prevention

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review to find interventions in primary health care that would increase osteoporosis prevention behaviors. Methods: Systematic searches of CINAHL, Eric, Medline complete, PsycInfo, Ovid, Web of Science, Cochrane Library (N=1270). A total of 17 published articles met our inclusion criteria. English-language articles published between January 2000-May 2019, in primary care settings, participants with healthy or risk of osteoporosis, investigated osteoporosis preventing behaviors. The data extracted included population characteristics, diagnosis, mean age and setting, intervention and control groups, and outcomes of significance to the review question and specific objectives. In this review, a meta-analysis could not be performed due to the heterogeneity of the data. Results: The majority of studies have been found to use multiple strategies to prevent osteoporosis. Eight studies focused only on the female gender and seven studies focused only on older adults. Compared to the control groups, it was found that the participants’ osteoporosis knowledge increased significantly (p

🔖

Cite This Article

BAZ, S., TORAMAN, A. U. (2022). Interventions Preventing Osteoporosis in Primary Care: A Systematic Review. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 3, 772–782. https://ajindex.com/articles/481095

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. NIH consensus development panel on osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis and therapy. JAMA 2001;285(6):785–95.
  2. Kanis JA, Melton LJ 3rd, Christiansen C, Johnston CC, Khaltaev N. The diagnosis of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 1994;9(8):1137–1141. Consensus development conference: diagnosis, prophylaxis, and treatment of osteoporosis. Am J Med 1993;94(6):646–650.
  3. Tuzun S, Eskiyurt N, Akarirmak U, Saridogan M, Senocak M, Johansson H, Kanis JA. Incidence of hip fracture and prevalence of osteoporosis in Turkey: the FRACTURK study. Osteoporos Int 2012;23(3):949–955.
  4. Keskin Y, Çekin MD, Gündüz H, Lüleci NE, Giray E, Sur H, Akyüz G. The prevalence of osteoporosis in the thrace region of Turkey: A community-based study. Turk J Phys Med Rehabil 2014;60(4):335–340.
  5. Kucukler FK, Simsek Y, Turk AÇ, Arduc A, Guler S. Osteoporosis and silent vertebral fractures in nursing home resident elderly men in Turkey. J Clin Densitom 2017; 20(2):188–195.
  6. Clynes MA, Harvey NC, Curtis EM, Fuggle NR, Dennison EM, Cooper C. The epidemiology of osteoporosis. Br Med Bull 2020;133(1):105–117. NOF. Learn What Osteoporosis Is and What It’s Caused by. National Osteoporosis Foundation 2018 May. Available from URL: https://www.nof.org/patients/what-is-osteoporosis/
  7. Hernlund E, Svedbom A, Ivergård M, Compston J, Cooper C, Stenmark J, McCloskey EV, Jönsson B, Kanis JA. Osteoporosis in the European Union: medical management, epidemiology and economic burden. A report prepared in collaboration with the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industry Associations (EFPIA). Arch Osteoporos 2013;8(1):136. Babatunde OT, Himburg SP, Newman FL, Campa A, Dixon Z. Theory-driven intervention improves calcium intake, osteoporosis knowledge, and self-efficacy in community-dwelling older Black adults. J Nutr Educ Behav 2011;43(6):434–440.
  8. Law A V., Shapiro K. Impact of a community pharmacist directed clinic in improving screening and awareness of osteoporosis. J Eval Clin Pract 2005;11(3):247–255.
  9. Piaseu N, Belza B, Mitchell P. Testing the effectiveness of an osteoporosis educational program for nursing students in Thailand. Arthritis Care Res 2001;45(3):246–251.
  10. Dontas IA, Yiannakopoulos CK. Risk factors and prevention of osteoporosis-related fractures. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 2007;7(3):268–272.
  11. Pouresmaeili F, Kamalidehghan B, Kamarehei M, Goh YM.A comprehensive overview on osteoporosis and its risk factors. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2018;6(14):2029–