Journals / Aquatic Sciences and Engineering / 2018 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 2

The Asi River’s Estimated Nutrient Load and Effects on the Eastern Mediterranean

Pages
61–66
Publication Date
2018-04-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In other words, nutrient load increases the receiving area’s primary productivity.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Rivers are primary receiving environments for agricultural runoff and for domestic and industrial discharges.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Monitoring data from 2006 to 2014 from the State of Hydraulic Works of Turkey were analyzed with an interpolation-based average-estimator model for nutrient load calculation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In other words, nutrient load increases the receiving area’s primary productivity.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Orontes River · Riverine input · chlorophyll

Abstract

Rivers are primary receiving environments for agricultural runoff and for domestic and industrial discharges. Rivers assimilate and treat incoming pollution load until self-purification capacity is reached. The remaining pollution load and natural nutrients are carried to and discharged into the sea causing variations in the receiving area’s nutrient concentration. This study evaluated nutrient loads and effects of the Asi River on the northeastern Mediterranean Sea. Monitoring data from 2006 to 2014 from the State of Hydraulic Works of Turkey were analyzed with an interpolation-based average-estimator model for nutrient load calculation. The nutrient load’s impact on the receiving area was determined using satellite images. Annual nitrite (NO2), nitrate (NO3), ammonium (NH4), and phosphate (o-PO4) loads were found to be 234 102 tones/year, 2 402 066 tones/year, 1 123 714 tones/year, and 603 669 tones/year, respectively, with all nutrients showing distinct seasonality. The Asi River’s load increases during winter and reaches its maximum in spring. High stream flow due to increased precipitation during spring months could explain this situation. Similar results were obtained from satellite images. Chlorophyll-a concentrations in the receiving area increase during winter due to high nutrient load. In other words, nutrient load increases the receiving area’s primary productivity.

Özet

Rivers are primary receiving environments for agricultural runoff and for domestic and industrial discharges. Rivers assimilate and treat incoming pollution load until self-purification capacity is reached. The remaining pollution load and natural nutrients are carried to and discharged into the sea causing variations in the receiving area’s nutrient concentration. This study evaluated nutrient loads and effects of the Asi River on the northeastern Mediterranean Sea. Monitoring data from 2006 to 2014 from the State of Hydraulic Works of Turkey were analyzed with an interpolation-based average-estimator model for nutrient load calculation. The nutrient load’s impact on the receiving area was determined using satellite images. Annual nitrite (NO2), nitrate (NO3), ammonium (NH4), and phosphate (o-PO4) loads were found to be 234 102 tones/year, 2 402 066 tones/year, 1 123 714 tones/year, and 603 669 tones/year, respectively, with all nutrients showing distinct seasonality. The Asi River’s load increases during winter and reaches its maximum in spring. High stream flow due to increased precipitation during spring months could explain this situation. Similar results were obtained from satellite images. Chlorophyll-a concentrations in the receiving area increase during winter due to high nutrient load. In other words, nutrient load increases the receiving area’s primary productivity.

🔖

Cite This Article

KILIÇ, E., AKPINAR, A., Yücel, N. (2018). The Asi River’s Estimated Nutrient Load and Effects on the Eastern Mediterranean. Aquatic Sciences and Engineering, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 2, 61–66. https://ajindex.com/articles/48105

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Bettiol, C., Flaviano, C., Stefano, G., Molinaroli, E., Rossini, P., Zaggia, L., Zonta, R. (2005). Atmospheric and riverine inputs of metals, nutrients and persistent organic pollutants into the lagoon of Venice.Hydrobiologica, 550,151-165
  2. Chapin III, F.S., Walker, B.H., Hobbs, R.J., Hooper, D.U., Lawton, J.H., Sala, O.E., Tilman, D. (1997). Biotic control over the functioning ecosystem. Science, 227,500-504 D’Alimonte, D., Mélin, F., Zibordi, G., and Berthon, J.-F. (2003). Use of the novelty detection technique to identify the range of applicability of the empirical ocean color algorithms. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 41, 2833-2843. D’Alimonte, D., Zibordi, G. (2003). Phytoplankton determination in an optically complex coastal region using a multilayer perceptron neural network. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing, 41, 286 Iyiduvar, O. (1986). Hydrographic characteristics of Iskenderun Bay (Doctoral dissertation, MSc. Thesis, Institute of Marine Sciences, Middle East Technical University, 33731, Erdemli-Içel). Kılıç, E. (2007). Evaluation of water quality in Asi Watershed using multivariate statistics. M.Sc thesis. Institute of Engineering and Natural Sciences, İskenderun Technical University. 86 p. Koçak, M., Kubilay, N., Tuğrul, S., Mihalopoulus, N. (2010). Atmospheric nutrient inputs to the northern Levantine basin from a long-term observation: sources and comparison with riverine inputs. Biogeosciences, 7(12), 4037-4050
  3. Krom, M.D., Herut, B., Mantoura, R.F.C. (2004). Nutrient budget for the Eastern Mediterranean: Implications for phosphorus limitation. Limnology and Oceanography, 49 (5), 1582-1592
  4. Laznik, M., Stalnacke, P., Grimvall, A., Wittgren, H.B. (1999). Riverine input of nutrients to the Golf of Riga- temporal and spatial variation. Journal of Marine Systems, 23,11-25
  5. Ministry of Environment. (2004) Water Pollution Control Regulation. Official Bulletin Number: 25687,2004
  6. Morkoç, E., Tüfekçi, V., Tüfekçi, H., Tolun, L., Karakoç, F.T.,Güvensel, T. (2009). Effects of land-based sources on water quality in the Omerli reservoir (Istanbul, Turkey).Environ Geol, 57,1035-1045
  7. Ogwueleka, T.C. (2015). Use of multivariate statistical techniques for the evaluation of temporal and spatial variations in water quality of the Kaduna River, Nigeria. Environmental monitoring and assessment, 187(3), 1-17.
  8. Polat, S. (2002).
  9. Nutrients, Chlorophyll a and Phytoplankton in the İskenderun Bay (Northeastern Mediterranean). Marine Ecology, 23 (2),115-126 Quilbé, R.,