Journals / Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1

Different Perspectives Related to Globalization and Environment

Küreselleşme ve Çevreye İlişkin Farklı Yaklaşımlar

Pages
57–70
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The aim of the study is to evaluate the different perspectives and interpretations and form a new perspective towards modern environmental problems by way of making a synthesis and assess the relation between globalization and environment under a general framework.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The phenomenon of globalization including many meanings in terms of various aspects plays the most critical role in assessing climate change; economical, political, sociological, local and supranational relations that come forward within this context.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The globalization movement, which has gained high speed through the economical leaps of the 21st century, has been adopted by the free market liberals and institutionalists while it is seen by bioenvironmentalists and socioenvironmentalists as a process which is undesired and disrupts natural balances.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The aim of the study is to evaluate the different perspectives and interpretations and form a new perspective towards modern environmental problems by way of making a synthesis and assess the relation between globalization and environment under a general framework.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The phenomenon of globalization including many meanings in terms of various aspects plays the most critical role in assessing climate change; economical, political, sociological, local and supranational relations that come forward within this context. The globalization movement, which has gained high speed through the economical leaps of the 21st century, has been adopted by the free market liberals and institutionalists while it is seen by bioenvironmentalists and socioenvironmentalists as a process which is undesired and disrupts natural balances. As globalization is a discourse that involves particularly the environment, it is inevitable to come across different interpretations of it. The aim of the study is to evaluate the different perspectives and interpretations and form a new perspective towards modern environmental problems by way of making a synthesis and assess the relation between globalization and environment under a general framework.

Özet

Birçok açıdan farklı anlamları içinde barındıran küreselleşme olgusu, küresel çevre değişimi ve bu bağlamda gelişen ekonomik, politik, sosyolojik, yerel ve ulusüstü ilişkilerin incelenmesinde en kritik rolü oynamaktadır. 21. yy ekonomik atılımlarıyla büyük bir ivme kazanan küreselleşme hareketi, serbest pazarcı ve bu pazarların işlerliğini sağlamlaştıracak kurumsalcı yaklaşımlarca benimsenirken, biyo-çevreci ve sosyo-çevreci yaklaşımlarca istenmeyen ve doğal dengeleri bozan bir süreç olarak değerlendirilmektedir. Küreselleşme özellikle de çevreyi de içine alan bir söylem olduğundan kendisine dair farklı yorumların bulunması kaçınılmazdır. Çalışmanın amacı, farklı bakış açılarını ve yorumları genel bir çatı altında değerlendirip kapsamlı bir sentez üreterek günümüz çevresel problemlerine farklı bir bakış açısı kazandırmak ve genel bir sınıflandırma dâhilinde küreselleşme ve çevre ilişkisini irdelemektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

MAZI, F., ERCİNS, G. (2022). Different Perspectives Related to Globalization and Environment. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1, 57–70. https://ajindex.com/articles/480918

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (24)

  1. AKTAN, C. ve H. ŞEN, (2003), “Global Ekonomide Değişim: Globalleşme”, Modernite’den Postmodernite’ye Değişim, Çizgi Kitabevi,
  2. Konya. BARKER, Debi ve Jerry MANDER, (1999), “Invisible Government-The World Trade Organization: Global Government for the New Millennium?”A Primer Prepared for The International Forum on Globalization, SanFrancisco. BOZKURT, V., (2000), “Küreselleşme: Kavram, gelişim ve Yaklaşımlar”, Küreselleşmenin İnsani Yüzü, Alfa Basım Yayım Dağıtım, İstanbul.
  3. CARSON, Rachel, (1962),
  4. Silent Spring, Houghton Mifflin, Boston. CASTELLS, M., (2005),
  5. Ağ Toplumunun Yükselişi, Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları,
  6. İstanbul.
  7. DALY, Herman E., (2005), “Economics in Full World”, Scientific American, (September), Vol: 293, No: 3. EHRLICH, Paul R., (1968),
  8. The Population Bomb, Sierra Club-Ballantine, New York. ERTUNA, Ö., (2006), “Yeni Dünya Düzeni: Küreselleşme”, Muhasebe Ve Finans Dergisi, Sayı: 30, ss.35-45.
  9. FRIEDMAN, Thomas., (1999), Lexus and the Olive Tree: Understanding Globalization, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York. FRIEDMAN, Thomas., (2002), “Techno Logic. In States of Discord, A DebateBetween Thomas Friedman and Robert Kaplan”. Foreign Policy, (March-April), pp.: 64-71.
  10. GAWOR, L., (2008), “Globalization and Its Alternatives: Antiglobalism, Alterglobalism and the Idea of Sustainable Development”, Sustainable Development, Vol: 16, No: 2, pp. 126-134.
  11. HAAS, Peter, Keohane ROBERT and Levy MARC, (eds), (1993), Institutions for theEarth: Sources of Effective International Environmental Protectio,, MA: MIT Press,
  12. Cambridge. HARDIN, Garrett, (1968), “The Tragedy of the Commons”, Science, Vol:16, No:2, ss. 1243- 1248. HARDIN, Garrett, (1974). “Living on a Lifeboat”, Bioscience, Vol:24, No:10, ss. 561-568.
  13. HELD, David, Anthony McGREW, David GOLDBLATT ve Jonathan PERRATON, (1999), Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, and Culture, CA:Stanford University Press.
  14. HELLIWELL, John F., (2002),
  15. Globalization and Well-Being, Vancouver, BC: UBC Press.
  16. HUNTINGTON, S., Biz Kimiz: Amerika’nın Ulusal Kimlik Arayışı, (Çev: Aytül Özer), CSA Yayınları,
  17. İstanbul.
  18. KAZGAN, G., (2002),
  19. Küreselleşme ve Ulus-Devlet, Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları,
  20. İstanbul.
  21. LEVY, David ve Peter NEWELL, (2002), “Business Strategy and International Environmental Governance: Toward a Neo-Gramscian Synthesis, Global Environmental Politics, Vol: 2, No:4, pp. 84-101.
  22. MOORE, M., (2003), Sınırların Olmadığı Dünya, (Çev: Aytül Özer ve Yeşim Türkmenoğlu), CSA Yayınları,
  23. İstanbul.
  24. PANAYOTOU, T., (1997), “D