Journals / Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 2

Relationship Among Consumer Disgust Sensitivity, Risk Aversion and Brand Loyalty: A Trait-based Approach

TÜKETİCİLERİN TİKSİNME DUYARLILIĞI İLE RİSKTEN KAÇINMA VE MARKA SADAKATİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ: HUY TEMELLİ BİR YAKLAŞIM

Pages
212–229
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, this study is expected to contribute marketing literature.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Disgust has been a neglected negative emotion in the domain of marketing.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A convenience sample of 380 university students are surveyed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, this study is expected to contribute marketing literature.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Disgust has been a neglected negative emotion in the domain of marketing. While several research on disgust has focused on the presence of disgust stimuli on consumer behaviour, little has paid attention to consumer disgust sensitivity. The purpose of the study is to examine the influence of consumer disgust sensitivity on consumer behaviour. A convenience sample of 380 university students are surveyed. In order to test the research hypotheses, partial least square structural equation modelling is used. Findings show that consumers’ disgust sensitivity has a positive influence on their risk averseness. Besides, risk aversion has a positive effect on consumers’ general brand loyalty. This study provides an evidence for a trait-based mechanism showing disgust sensitivity’s role on consumer behaviour. In other words, disgust sensitivity may have an influence on consumer behaviour without the presence of disgust stimuli. Therefore, this study is expected to contribute marketing literature.

Özet

Tiksinme pazarlama alanında ihmal edilen olumsuz duygulardan biri olmuştur. Bu alanda yapılan bazı çalışmalar tiksinme uyaranı varlığının tüketici davranışına etkisine odaklansa da, çok azı tüketicilerin tiksinme duyarlılığı konusuna dikkat etmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, tüketici tiksinme duyarlılığının tüketici davranışı üzerindeki etkisini incelemektir. Bu bağlamda çalışmada, 380 üniversite öğrencisine kolayda örnekleme ile anket uygulanmıştır. Araştırma hipotezlerini test etmek için kısmi en küçük kareler yapısal eşitlik modellemesi kullanılmaktadır. Bulgular, tüketicilerin tiksinme duyarlılıklarının riskten kaçınmaları üzerinde olumlu etkisi olduğunu göstermektedir. Bunun yanında, riskten kaçınmanın tüketicilerin genel marka sadakatleri üzerinde pozitif etkisi olduğu görülmektedir. Bu çalışma, tiksinme duyarlılığının tüketici davranışları üzerindeki rolünü gösteren huy temelli bir mekanizmanın varlığına kanıt sunmaktadır. Başka deyişle, tiksinme uyaranı olmasa bile tiksinme duyarlılığı tüketici davranışı üzerinde etkide bulunabilir. Sonuç olarak, bu çalışmanın pazarlama literatürüne katkı sağlaması beklenmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KUTLU, M. B. (2022). Relationship Among Consumer Disgust Sensitivity, Risk Aversion and Brand Loyalty: A Trait-based Approach. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 2, 212–229. https://ajindex.com/articles/480580

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. AMMANN, Jeanine; Christina HARTMANN and Michael SIEGRIST (2018), “Does food disgust sensitivity influence eating behaviour? Experimental validation of the Food Disgust Scale”, Food Quality and Preference, Vol 68; 411-414.
  2. ARGO, Jennifer. J.; Darren W. DAHL and Andrea C. MORALES (2006), “Consumer contamination: How consumers react to products touched by others”, Journal of Marketing, Vol 70; 81-94.
  3. AYTEKİN, Nihan (2013).
  4. Tiksindirici Olanı Yok Etmek, Kendimizi Temizlemek: Detan ve Domestos Reklamları Örneginde Bir Güç Savası. ((Re)Making and Undoing of Peace/Conflict (Eds. Tugrul Ilter, Hanife Aliefendioglu, Pembe Behçetogulları, Nurten Kara). Famagusta: Eastern Mediterranean University Press, 91-102.
  5. BERGER, Uri and David ANAKI (2014), “Demographic influences on disgust: Evidence from a heterogeneous sample”, Personality and Individual Differences, Vol 64, 67-71.
  6. BLOEMER, Jose M. M. and Hans D. P. KASPER (1995), “The complex relationship between consumer satisfaction and brand loyalty”, Journal of Economic Psychology, Vol 16; 311-329.
  7. BRYANT, Fred B.; Paul R. YARNOLD and Laurence G. GRIMM (1996), “Toward a Measurement Model of the Affect Intensity Measure: A Three-Factor Structure”, Journal of Research in Personality, Vol 30; 223-247.
  8. BRYMAN, Alan and Emma BELL (2007), Business Research Methods, 2th Edition,
  9. Oxford University Press,
  10. New York. CASES, Anne-Sophie (2002), “Percieved risk and risk reduction strategies in internet shopping”, The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, Vol 12; 375-394.
  11. CHAUDHURI, Arjun (1997), “Consumption emotion and perceived risk: A macro- analytic approach”, Journal of Business Research, Vol 39; 81-92.
  12. CHAUDHURI, Arjun (1998), “Product class effects on perceived risk: The role of emotion”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol 15; 157-168.
  13. DAHL, Darren; Kristina D. FRANKENBERGER and Rajesh V. MANCHANDA (2003), “Does It Pay to Shock? Reactions to Shocking and Nonshocking Advertising Content among University Students”, Journal of Advertising Research, Vol 43; 268-280.
  14. DENS, Nathalie; Patrick De PELSMACKER and Wim JANSSENS (2008), “Exploring consumer reactions to incongruent mild disgust appeals”, Journal of Marketing Communications, Vol 14; 249-269.
  15. ELLIOT, Richard and Larry PERCY (2007),
  16. Strategic Brand Management, Oxford University Press,
  17. New York. GARRETSON, Judith A.; Dan FISHER and Scot BURTON (2002), “Antecedents of private label attitude and national brand promotion attitude: si