SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 1

Leadership Understanding in 21st Century

21. Yüzyılın Liderlik Anlayışına Bakış

Doğan N. LEBLEBİCİ
Pages
61–72
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study, leadership understanding of 21st century has been debated and its main characteristics have been tried to be presented.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Starting with the motto; “the only thing remains unchanged is the change itself,” it is possible to assert that organizations will have to keep up with the change which is unavoidable product of time.
📊
Key Findings & Data:At this point, the main element affecting the perception of an organization about the change is the perception of its leader or its manager. 21st century seems to be the one of the most challenging time with accelerated change.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study, leadership understanding of 21st century has been debated and its main characteristics have been tried to be presented.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Starting with the motto; “the only thing remains unchanged is the change itself,” it is possible to assert that organizations will have to keep up with the change which is unavoidable product of time. The problem is how an organization perceives the change. Organizations perceiving change as a threat and trying to prevent it will disappear or at least will face with huge losses. At this point, the main element affecting the perception of an organization about the change is the perception of its leader or its manager. 21st century seems to be the one of the most challenging time with accelerated change. In this study, leadership understanding of 21st century has been debated and its main characteristics have been tried to be presented.

Özet

“Dünyada değişmeyen tek şey değişimdir” sözünden hareketle örgütlerin akıp giden zamanın getirdiği değişime ayak uydurmak zorunda kalacakları söylenebilir. Sorun örgütün değişimi nasıl algıladığıyla ilgilidir. Değişimi bir tehdit olarak gören ve onu engellemeye çalışan örgütlerin yok olması veya en azından büyük kayıplar yaşamaları neredeyse kaçınılmazdır. Bu noktada örgütün algısını belirleyen en önemli unsur liderin veya yöneticinin değişime bakışıdır. 21. yüzyıl ivmesi giderek artan bir değişime sahne olacak gibi görünmektedir. Bu çalışmada 21. yüzyılda bir liderden beklenen yaklaşımın ne olacağı sorgulanmış ve yeni liderlik anlayışının özellikleri sunulmaya çalışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

LEBLEBİCİ, D. N. (2022). Leadership Understanding in 21st Century. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 1, 61–72. https://ajindex.com/articles/480240

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. ADAIR, J. (1973),
  2. Action-Centered Leadership, McGraw-Hill, New York. AYDIN, M. Devrim (1998), Kamu Sektöründe Hizmet Kalitesinin Geliştirilmesinde Çağdaş Bir Yaklaşım: Toplam Kalite Yönetimi, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi SBE, Ankara.
  3. BARNEY, J. B. ve R.W. Griffin. (1992),
  4. The Management of Organizations, Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston. BENNIS, Waren (1997), “Liderin Lideri Olmak,” Geleceği Yeniden Düşünmek (Derleyen: Rowan Gibson), Çev: Sinem Gül, Sabah Kitapları, İstanbul: 133-144.
  5. BENNIS, Warren (1989), Bir Lider Olabilmek (Çev. Utku Teksöz), Sistem Yayıncılık, İstanbul.
  6. BENNIS, Waren ve Robert Townsend (1995),
  7. Reinventing Leadership, William Marrow and Comp.Inc., New York. BLAKE, Robert R. ve Jane Srygley Mouton (1969), The Managerial Grid: Key Orientations for Achieving Production Through People (13nd Ed), Gulf Publishing Company, Houston. BLANCHARD, Paul ve Kenneth H. Hersey (1972), Management of Organizational Behavior: Utilizing Human Resources, Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, New York. BOUNDS, Greg ve Ark. (1994), Beyond Total Quality Management: Toward the Emerging Paradigm, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York. CAN, Halil (1991),
  8. Organizasyon ve Yönetim, Adım Yayıncılık, Ankara.
  9. COLE, G.A. (1997), Personnel Management (4th Ed.), Letts Educational, London. COVEY, Stephen (1997), “İlkelere Öncelik Vermek,” Geleceği Yeniden Düşünmek, (Derleyen: Rowan Gibson), Çev: Sinem Gül, Sabah Kitapları, İstanbul: 33-42.
  10. DAVIS, Keith (1967), Human Relations at Work (3rd Ed.), McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York. DAVIS, Keith ve John W. Newstrom (1989),
  11. Human Behavior at Work, McGraw-Hill Publishing Company, New York. DUNCAN, W. Jack (1981), Organizational Behavior (2nd Ed.), Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston. EIGEN, Lewis D. ve Jonathan P. Siegel (1989), The Manager’s Book of Quotations, Amacom, New York. ERGUN, Turgay ve Aykut Polatoğlu (1984), Kamu Yönetimine Giriş (2.Baskı), TODAİE Yayınları,
  12. Ankara.
  13. FIEDLER, Fred E. (1967),
  14. A Theory of Leadership Effectiveness, McGraw- Hill, New York. FRENCH, J.R.P. ve B.H. Raven (1959), “The Bases of Social Power”, Studies in Social Power (Ed.Darwin Cartwright), Ann Arbor, Mich, Michigan. GANDZ, Jeffrey (1986), “Reflections on the best companies for which to work”, Business Quarterly, Vol.51, No.2: 6-7.
  15. GATEWOOD, R.D., Taylor, R.R. ve O.C. Ferrel (1995),
  16. Management, Austen Press,
  17. Chicago. GARMAGER, Tim ve Lynn Shemmer (1998), “Rich in culture, rich in profits”, HR Focus, Vol.75, No.9 HANDY, Charles (1993