SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2

Patriarchy and Masculinity Relations in The Middle East

Ortadoğu’da Ataerkillik ve Erkeklik İlişkileri

Çağdaş DEMREN
Pages
321–329
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However men and women do not have the same chances in the mundane life since the relations in the mundane life are shaped through patriarchical rules.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this article is to explore the relations between patriarchy, masculinity and Islam in the Middle East.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It is argued that patriarchy affects masculinity or vice versa.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However men and women do not have the same chances in the mundane life since the relations in the mundane life are shaped through patriarchical rules.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this article is to explore the relations between patriarchy, masculinity and Islam in the Middle East. It is argued that patriarchy affects masculinity or vice versa. In the Middle East context the people are equal in front of God. However men and women do not have the same chances in the mundane life since the relations in the mundane life are shaped through patriarchical rules.

Özet

Bu makalenin amacı Orta Doğu’da ataerkillik, erkeklik ve İslam arasındaki ilişkileri göstermektir. Ataerkilliğin erkekliği ya da erkekliğin ataerkilliği nasıl etkilediği tartışılmıştır. Ortadoğu bağlamında insanlar Allah’ın önünde eşittir. Fakat erkekler ve kadınlar dünyevi yaşamda aynı şanslara sahip değildirler. Çünkü dünyevi yaşamda ilişkiler ataerkillik kuralları aracılığıyla biçimlenir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMREN, Ç. (2022). Patriarchy and Masculinity Relations in The Middle East. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2, 321–329. https://ajindex.com/articles/480232

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. BAUDRILLARD, Jean. (2001), Baştan Çıkarma Üzerine, (Çev: Ayşegül Sönmezay), İstanbul:
  2. Ayrıntı Yayınları.
  3. DELANEY, Carol. (1991), The Seed and the Soil: Gender and Cosmology in Turkish Village Society, Los Angeles: The Regents of the University of California Press.
  4. EICKELMAN, Dale F. (1989), The Middle East: An Anthropological Approach, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. GILMORE, David D. (1987), “Introduction: The Shame of Dishonor”, Honor and Shame and The Unity of The Mediterranean, (ed. D.D.Gilmore), The American Anthropological Association, p, 2-21.
  5. GILMORE, David D. (1990), Manhood in the Making: Cultural Concepts of Masculinity, London: Yale University Press.
  6. HIRSHON, Renee. (2000), Mübadele Çocukları, (Çev: Serpil Çağlayan), İstanbul: Tarih Vakfı Yurt Yayınları.
  7. KANDİYOTİ, Deniz. (1997),
  8. Cariyeler, Bacılar, Yurttaşlar, (Çev: Aksu Bora ve Diğerleri), İstanbul:
  9. Metis Yayınları.
  10. LINDHOLM, Charles. (1996), The Islamic Middle East: An Historical Anthropology, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
  11. LUPTON, Deborah. (2002), Duygusal Yaşantı: Sosyo - Kültürel Bir İnceleme, (Çev: Mustafa Cemal), İstanbul:
  12. Ayrıntı Yayınları.
  13. MEEKER, Michael M. (1976), “Meaning and Society in The Near East: Examples from The Black Sea Turks and The Levantine Arabs (1)”, International Journal of Middle East Studies 7, p, 243-270.
  14. ROSEN, Lawrence. (1984), Bargaining for Reality: The Construction of Social Relations in a Muslim Community, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  15. WALLE, Thomas M. (1998), “As Good As a Man Can Be: Some Thoughts on Love, Marriage and Masculinity”, Oslo: The Fourth Nordic Conference on Middle Eastern Studies 13-16 August.