SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 1

Subjectivity of Masculinity Through Feminity

Kadınlık Dolayımıyla Erkeklik Öznelliği

Çağdaş DEMREN
Pages
73–92
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this work this phenomenon is discussed in the context of Yatıkevler Gecekondu District.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this work is to explore the interconnections and relations between masculinity and feminity through the formation of masculine subjectivity.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It is based upon the argument that masculinity is socially constructed in and intertwined with relations of power.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this work this phenomenon is discussed in the context of Yatıkevler Gecekondu District.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this work is to explore the interconnections and relations between masculinity and feminity through the formation of masculine subjectivity. It is based upon the argument that masculinity is socially constructed in and intertwined with relations of power. Men’s constructed subjectivities are multiple and contradictory and they are experienced in relations with others mostly with women as wives and “other women”. Performing these masculine subjectivities necessitate their consent, but sometimes mutual agreement cannot be reached and conflict arises. This causes different perceptions of subjectivities among men. In this work this phenomenon is discussed in the context of Yatıkevler Gecekondu District.

Özet

Bu makalede eril öznelliğin oluşumu dolayımıyla erkeklik ve kadınlık arasındaki bağlantılar ve ilişkiler incelenmiştir. Çalışma, erkekliğin toplumsal olarak inşa edildiği ve iktidar ilişkileriyle iç içe geçtiği argümanına dayanmaktadır. Erkeklik, tüm yaşam boyu süren bir süreç ve deneyim olan bir öznellik olarak ele alınmıştır. Erkeklerin inşa edilen öznellikleri çoklu ve çelişkilidir, başta eş ve “öteki kadın” olarak kadınlarla ilişkisellik içerisinde deneyimlenirler. Erkeklerin öznelliklerinin icrası onların rızasını gerektirir, fakat bazen bu karşılıklı uzlaşmaya varılamaz ve çatışma doğar. Bu, erkekler arasında öznelliklerinin farklı algılanmasına neden olur. Bu olgu Ankara-Yatıkevler Gecekondu Mahallesi bağlamında tartışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMREN, Ç. (2022). Subjectivity of Masculinity Through Feminity. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 1, 73–92. https://ajindex.com/articles/480225

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. BUTLER, Judith. (1990), Gender Trouble – Feminism and The Subversion of Identitiy, New York: Routledge. BUTLER, Judith. (1993), Bodies Thet Matter – On The Dircursive Limits of Sex, New York: Routledge. FOUCAULT, Michel. (2005), Özne ve İktidar, (Çev: Işık Ergüden ve Osman Akınhay), İstanbul:
  2. Ayrıntı Yayınları.
  3. HARVEY, Penelope. (1994), “Domestic Violence in The Peruvian Andes”, Sex and Violence – Issues in Representation and Experience, (ed. P. Harvey ve P. Gow), London: Routledge, p.66-89.
  4. JACKSON, Michael. (1996), “Introduction – Phenomenology, Radical Empiricisim and Anthropological Critique”, Things As They Are – New Directions in Phenomenological Anthropology, (ed. M. Jackson), Bloomington: Indiana University Press, p.1-50.
  5. LANCASTER, Roger N. (1994), Life is Hard – Machismo, Danger and The Intimacy of Power in Nicaragua, Berkeley: University of California Press.
  6. MANSFIELD, Nick. (2006), Öznellik – Freud’dan Haraway’e Kendilik Kuramları, (Çev: H. Çetinkaya ve R. Durmaz), İzmir:
  7. Ara-lık Yayınları.
  8. MOORE, Henrietta L. (1993), “The Differences Within and The Differences Between”, Gendered Anthropology, (ed. T. Del Valle), London: Routledge, p.193-204.
  9. MOORE, Henrietta L. (1994),
  10. A Passion for Difference, Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
  11. MOORE, Henrietta L. (1999), “Whatever Happened to Women and Men? – Gender and Other Crises in Anthropology”, Anthropolical Theory Today, (ed. H. L. Moore), Cambridge: Polity Press.
  12. TOREN, Christina. (1994), “Transforming Love – Representing Fijian Hierarchy”, Sex and Violence – Issues in Representation and Experience, (ed. P. Harvey ve P. Gow), London: Routledge, p.18-39.
  13. WADE, Peter. (1994), “Man The Hunter – Gender and Violence in Music and Drinking Contexts in Colombia.”, Sex and Violence – Issues in Representation and Experience, (ed. P. Harvey ve P. Gow), London: Routledge, p.115-137.
  14. WHITEHEAD, Stephen M. (2002),
  15. Men and Masculinities, Cambridge: Polity Press.