Journals / Cumhuriyet Uluslararası Eğitim Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 4

Evaluation of Material Development and Presentation Process within the Scope of Instructional Technologies and Material Design Course

Öğretim Teknolojileri ve Materyal Tasarımı Dersi Kapsamında Materyal Geliştirme ve Sunum Sürecinin Değerlendirilmesi

Pages
551–570
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Another suggestion includes sharing the materials prepared by the students within the scope of the ITMD course with nearby schools or village schools so that they make use of them in their teaching- learning process.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aimed to evaluate the development and presentation process of materials prepared by sophomores studying in the Department of Elementary Education in the Faculty of Education at Cumhuriyet University in the spring semester of 2017-2018 academic year within the scope of Instructional Technologies and Material Design course in accordance with the views of 52 sophomore preservice primary teachers (33 females, 19 males) taking this course in this term.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The data were analyzed using Maxqda11, qualitative data analysis software, and descriptive analysis technique.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Another suggestion includes sharing the materials prepared by the students within the scope of the ITMD course with nearby schools or village schools so that they make use of them in their teaching- learning process.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017-2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the development and presentation process of materials prepared by sophomores studying in the Department of Elementary Education in the Faculty of Education at Cumhuriyet University in the spring semester of 2017-2018 academic year within the scope of Instructional Technologies and Material Design course in accordance with the views of 52 sophomore preservice primary teachers (33 females, 19 males) taking this course in this term. An interview form including five semi structured questions and prepared by the researcher was used as a tool for the collection of data. The data were analyzed using Maxqda11, qualitative data analysis software, and descriptive analysis technique. After generating main categories and themes, codes obtained from the views were arranged according to the themes. The findings disclosed that sophomore preservice primary teachers had positive opinions about the development and presentation process of materials. However, regarding preparing a material and preparing a presentation themes, the participants also mentioned some difficulties they experienced during this process. At the end of the term, exhibition of the prepared materials by students was suggested for other teachers and students to visit and see them. Another suggestion includes sharing the materials prepared by the students within the scope of the ITMD course with nearby schools or village schools so that they make use of them in their teaching- learning process.

Özet

Bu çalışma Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Sınıf Öğretmenliği Anabilim Dalında 2017-2018 yılı bahar yarı döneminde öğrenimlerini sürdüren 2. Sınıf öğrencilerinin Öğretim Teknolojileri ve Materyal Tasarımı dersi kapsamında hazırladıkları materyalleri geliştirme ve sunum sürecinin bu dersi alan 52 ikinci sınıf öğretmen adayının (33 kız, 19 erkek) görüşleri doğrultusunda değerlendirilmesini kapsamaktadır. Veriler, araştırmacı tarafından araştırmanın amacına göre hazırlanmış beş yarı yapılandırılmış sorudan oluşan bir görüşme formu ile toplanmıştır. Veriler Maxqda 11 nitel veri analizi programı ve betimsel analiz tekniği ile analiz edilmiştir. Ana kategoriler ve temalar oluşturulduktan sonra, görüşlerden elde edilen kodlar temalar altında sıralanmıştır. Bulgular, ikinci sınıf öğretmen adaylarının, materyallerin geliştirilmesi ve sunum süreci hakkında olumlu düşüncelere sahip olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Ancak, materyal hazırlama ve sunum aşamalarına yönelik yaşanılan zorluklar da ortaya çıkmıştır. Dönem sonunda, öğrenciler tarafından hazırlanan materyallerin diğer öğretmenler ve öğrenciler tarafından ziyaret edilerek görülmesi açısından sergilenmesi önerilmektedir. Diğer bir öneride bu materyallerin yakınlardaki okullar veya köy okulları ile paylaşılarak öğrenme- öğretme sürecinde kullanılmasını içermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ELALDI, Ş. (2022). Evaluation of Material Development and Presentation Process within the Scope of Instructional Technologies and Material Design Course. Cumhuriyet Uluslararası Eğitim Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 4, 551–570. https://ajindex.com/articles/480114

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Akçay, H., Tüysüz, C., Feyzioğlu, B., & Oğuz, B. (2008). Bilgisayar tabanlı ve bilgisayar destekli kimya öğretiminin öğrenci tutum ve başarısına etkisi. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 4(2), 169-181.
  2. Barnard, R. & Zemach, D. (2003). Materials for specific purposes. In Tomlinson, B. (ed). Developing Materials for Language Teaching, London: Continuum: 306-323.
  3. Boyatzis RE (1998) Transforming qualitative information. Sage: Cleveland Chlan, L., Halcón, L., Kreitzer, M., & Leonard, B. (2005). Selected complementary therapy skills influence of an experiential education session on nursing students' confidence levels in performing. Complementary Health Practice Review, 10, 189-201 DOI: 10.1177/1533210105284044. Cohen, J. (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37-46. D’Andrea, L., Waters, C. & Rudd, R. (2011). Using computer assisted qualitative software (CAQDAS) to evaluate a novel teaching method for introductory statistics. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 7(1), 48-60
  4. Demirel, Ö., Seferoğlu, S.S., Yağcı, E. (2004). Öğretim teknolojileri ve materyal geliştirme. Ankara:
  5. PegemA. Ferguson, L. M. (1996). Preceptors enhance students’ self-confidence. Nursing Connections, 9 (1), 49-61.
  6. Georgina, D. A. & Hosford, C. C. (2009). Higher education faculty perceptions on technology integration and training. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 690– 696 Hamza, M. (2012). Developing training material guide. Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency (MSB). Retrieved from https://www.msb.se/RibData/Filer/pdf/26433.pdf
  7. Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Russell, J. D. & Smaldino, S. E. (2002). Instructional media and technologies for learning (7th Ed.). Merrill Prentice Hall, USA. Hidi, S. (1990). Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning. Review of Educational Research, 60, 549–571
  8. Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41,111–127.
  9. Hine, L.R. (2006). Development of student nurse self-confidence in clinical practice. Doctoral Dissertation. College of Graduate Studies University of Idaho, the USA. UMI Number: 3250635 Inal, K. (2005). Yeni ilköğretim müfredatının felsefesi. Muhafazakar Düşünce, 6, 75-92.
  10. Ingersoll, R. M., & Strong, M. (2011). The impact of induction and mentoring programs for beginning teachers: A critical review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 191-201. DOI: 10.310