SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Akademik İncelemeler Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

Contemporary Contributions to Multicultural Theory and Discussing Multiculturalism within the Scope of Individual Rights-Group Rights

Çokkültürlülük Teorisine Çağdaş Katkılar ve Bireysel Haklar-Grup Hakları Ekseninde Çokkültürlülüğü Tartışmak

Mesut HAZIR
Pages
1–28
Publication Date
2014-07-24
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study, classical liberal views which represent monist side and multicultiralist views that represent pluralist side have been compared and contemporary contributions have been analysed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Muticulturalism has appeared and needed as a theory while different societies or ethnicities living together.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Both immigrant countries and societies which are together for hundreds of years have caused and produced problems about living together either from the very beginning or as new needs and world views have appeared within time.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study, classical liberal views which represent monist side and multicultiralist views that represent pluralist side have been compared and contemporary contributions have been analysed.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Çokkültürlülük · Adaletin Dağıtılması · Bireysel Haklar

Abstract

Muticulturalism has appeared and needed as a theory while different societies or ethnicities living together. Both immigrant countries and societies which are together for hundreds of years have caused and produced problems about living together either from the very beginning or as new needs and world views have appeared within time. Whereas monist views were common before, it has been discovered later that such philosophies aren’t sufficient for societies and multiculturalist views have appeared. Even though multiculturalism has been a reality throughout history, it is very new as a world view or ideology. In this study, classical liberal views which represent monist side and multicultiralist views that represent pluralist side have been compared and contemporary contributions have been analysed.

Özet

Çokkültülülük, farklı toplum veya etnisitelerin birlikte yaşama tecrübesi esnasında ihtiyaç duyulan bir teori olmuştur. Gerek göçmen ülkeler, gerek yüzyıllardır birlikte yaşayan toplumlar, ya en başından ya da zaman içinde değişen ihtiyaçlar ve dünyayı algılama biçimleri nedeniyle birlikte yaşama konusunda problem üretmişlerdir. Önceleri monist yaklaşımların ön planda çıktığı düşünce biçimleri yaygın iken, tek tip hayat algısının her toplumu tatmin etmediği görülmüş, çokkültürcü yaklaşımlar ortaya çıkmıştır. Çokkültürlülük bir vaka olarak tarihin her döneminde söz konusu olsa da, bir dünya görüşü ya da ideoloji olarak yenidir. Bu çalışmada, monist yaklaşımları temsil eden klasik liberal görüşler ile çoğulcu yaklaşımları temsil eden çokkültürcü teoriler kıyaslanmış, her iki yaklaşıma yapılan çağdaş katkılar ele alınmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

HAZIR, M. (2014). Contemporary Contributions to Multicultural Theory and Discussing Multiculturalism within the Scope of Individual Rights-Group Rights. Akademik İncelemeler Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 1–28. https://ajindex.com/articles/4786

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (33)

  1. APPIAH, K. A. (1994) “Identity, Authenticity, Survival Multicultural Societies and Social Reproduction”, Editor: Amy Gutmann, Multiculturalism, Princeton University Press, USA, p. 149-163.
  2. BARRY, B. (2002)
  3. Culture and Equality, Harvard University Press,
  4. USA. BENHABIB, S. (2002)
  5. The Claims of Culture, Princeton University Press,
  6. USA. CARENS, Joseph H. (1996) “Complex Justice, Cultural Difference and Political Community,” Editors: David Miller ve Michael Walzer, Pluralism, Justice and Equality, Oxford University Press, UK, p. 45-66.
  7. ELSTER, J. (1996) “The Empirical Study of Justice”, Editors: David Miller ve Michael Walzer, Pluralism, Justice and Equality, Oxford University Press, UK, p. 81-98.
  8. FRASER, N., AXEL, H. (2003) Redistribution of Recognition?, Verso Books, USA. GLAZER, N. (1983)
  9. Ethnic Dilemmas, Harvard University Press,
  10. USA. GUTMANN, A. (1996) “Justice Across the Spheres”, Pluralism, Justice and Equality, Editors: David Miller ve Michael Walzer, Oxford University Press, UK, p. 99-119.
  11. HABERMAS, J. (1994) “Struggles for Recognition in the Democratic Constitutional State”, Editor: Amy Gutmann, Multiculturalism, Princeton University Press, USA, p. 107-148.
  12. KYMLICKA, W. ( 2001)
  13. Politics in the Vernacular, Oxford University Press,
  14. UK. KYMLICKA, W. (1998)
  15. Çokkültürlü Yurttaşlık, Çev., Abdullah Yılmaz, Ayrıntı Yayınları,
  16. İstanbul.
  17. MILLER, D. (1996) “Introduction”, Editors: David Miller ve Michael Walzer, Pluralism, Justice and Equality, Oxford University Press, UK, p. 1-16.
  18. ÖZLEM, D., ATEŞOĞLU, G. (2006)
  19. Tarih Felsefesi, Doğu Batı Yayınları,
  20. Ankara.
  21. PAREKH, B. (2002)
  22. Çokkültürlülüğü Yeniden Düşünmek, Çev., Bilge Tanrıseven, Phoenix Yayınları,
  23. Ankara.
  24. PAREKH, B. (1994) Superior People: The Narrowness of Liberalism from Mill to Rawls, Times Literary Supplement. RAWLS, J. (2005)
  25. A Theory of Justice, Harvard University Press,
  26. USA. ROCKEFELLER, Steven C. (1994) “Comment”, Editor: Amy Gutmann, Multiculturalism, Princeton University Press, USA, p. 87-98.
  27. ROUSSEAU, J. J. (2009)
  28. Toplum Sözleşmesi, Çev., Vedat Günyol, Türkiye İş Bankası Yayınları,
  29. İstanbul.
  30. RUSTIN, M. (1996) “Equality in Post-Modern Times”, Editors: David Miller ve Michael Walzer, Pluralism, Justice and Equality, Oxford University Press, UK, p. 17-44.
  31. TAYLOR, Ch. (1994) “The Politics of Recognition”, Editor: Amy Gutmann, Multiculturalism, Princeton University Press, USA, p. 25-73.
  32. WALZER, M. (1983)
  33. Spheres of Justice, Basic Books Inc., USA. WALZER, M. (1994) “Comment”, Editor: Amy Gutmann, Multicu