Journals / Cumhuriyet Dental Journal / 2011 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 3

Evaluation of the natural tooth color of young Turkish population in Northern Cyprus: A pilot study

Genç Kuzey Kıbrıs Türk popülasyonunun doğal diş renginin değerlendirilmesi: Pilot çalışma

Pages
164–174
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However gender effected the a* values of central and lateral incisors and b* values of canines significantly (P

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the maxillary anterior natural tooth color of young Turkish population in Northern Cyprus according to Vitapan Classical shade guide (VCSG) and CIE L*a*b* color system, and to evaluate the effect of gender on the tooth color.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Eighty six volunteers (43 female, 43 male) between the age of 18-27 (mean age 20) participated to this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However gender effected the a* values of central and lateral incisors and b* values of canines significantly (P
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the maxillary anterior natural tooth color of young Turkish population in Northern Cyprus according to Vitapan Classical shade guide (VCSG) and CIE L*a*b* color system, and to evaluate the effect of gender on the tooth color. Materials and Methods: Eighty six volunteers (43 female, 43 male) between the age of 18-27 (mean age 20) participated to this study. The color of maxillary right or left central and lateral incisors and canines were measured with VITA Easyshade Compact (Vita Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Germany) spectrophotometer. The results were recorded according to VCSG and CIE L*a*b* color system. To determine the CIE L*a*b* color difference between central-lateral incisors and canine of the same person, ΔE values were calculated. The data were analyzed statistically. Results: No significant differences were found between the L* values of females and males. However gender effected the a* values of central and lateral incisors and b* values of canines significantly (P

Özet

Amaç: Kuzey Kıbrıs Türk popülasyonunun maksiler anterior dişlerinin renklerini Vitapan Classical skalasına ve CIE L*a*b* renk sistemine göre belirleyerek, cinsiyetin renk değerleri üzerine etkisini incelemektir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmaya 18-27 yaş aralığında, 43 bayan ve 43 erkek olmak üzere toplam 86 gönüllü birey katılmıştır. Maksiller sağ veya sol santral, lateral ve kanin dişlerinden VITA Easyshade Compact (VitaZahnfabrik, BadSäckingen, Almanya) spektrofotometre cihazı ile renk ölçümü yapılmış ve Vitapan Classical skalasına göre renk ve CIE L*a*b* değerleri kaydedilmiştir. Aynı bireyin santral, lateral ve kanin dişleri arasındaki CIE L*a*b* renk farkını değerlendirmek için ΔE değerleri hesaplanmıştır. Veriler istatistiksel olarak analiz edilmiştir. Bulgular: Bayanlar ve erkeklerin anterior dişlerinin L* değerleri arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark bulunamamıştır. Ancak cinsiyet, santral ve lateral dişlerin a*; kanin dişlerinin b* değerlerinde anlamlı bir fark yaratmıştır (P

🔖

Cite This Article

KURTULMUŞ, S. Y., ULUSOY, M., MERİÇ, G., ŞEKER, E., OZAN, O. (2022). Evaluation of the natural tooth color of young Turkish population in Northern Cyprus: A pilot study. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 3, 164–174. https://ajindex.com/articles/477273

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Raigrodski AJ, Chiche GJ, Aoshima H, Spiekerman CF. Efficacy of a computerized shade selection system in matching the shade of anterior metal-ceramic crowns: a pilot study. Quintessence Int 2006;37:793-802
  2. Brewer JD, Wee A, Seghi R. Advances in color matching. Dent Clin North Am 2004;48:341-358
  3. Okubo SR, Kanawati A, Richards MW, Childress S. Evaluation of visual and instrument shade matching. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:642-648
  4. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Fujimoto J. Contemporary fixed prosthodontics. 4th Ed. St. Louis: Mosby,2006:709- 726. 5. van der Burgt TP, ten Bosch JJ, Borsboom PC, Kortsmit WJ. A comparison of new and conventional methods for quantification of tooth color. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:155- 162
  5. Sproull RC. Color matching in dentistry. Part II: practical applications for the organization of color. 1973. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86:458-464
  6. Hassel AJ, Grossmann AC, Schmitter M, Balke Z, Buzello AM. Interexaminer reliability in clinical measurement of L*C*h* values of anterior teeth using a spectrophotometer. Int J Prosthodont 2007;20:79-84
  7. Judeh A, Al-Wahadni A. A comparison between conventional visual and spectrophotometric methods for shade selection. Quintessence Int 2009;40:69-79
  8. Goodkind RJ, Schwabacher WB. Use of a fiber-optic colorimeter for in vivo color measurements of 2830 anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1987;58:535- 542
  9. Schwabacher WB, Goodkind RJ. Three-dimensional color coordinates of natural teeth compared with three shade guides. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:425-431
  10. Miller LL. Shade matching. J Esthet Dent 1993;5:143-153
  11. Rubino M, Barcia JA, Jimenez del Barco L, Romero J. Colour measurement of human teeth and evaluation of a colour guide. Color Research and Application 1994;19:19- 22
  12. Yap AU. Color attributes and accuracy of vita-based manufacturers’ shade guides. Oper Dent 1998;28:266-271
  13. Paul S, Peter A, Pietroban N, Hammerle CHF. Visual and spectrophotometric shade analysis of human teeth. J Dent Res 2002;81:578- 582
  14. Dagg H, O'Connell B, Claffey N, Byrne D, Gorman C. The influence of some different factors on the accuracy of shade selection. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:900-904
  15. Paravina RD, Powers JM. Esthetic color training in dentistry. St. Louis: Elsevier Mosby,2004:26,139,142
  16. O’Brien WJ. Dental materials and their selection. 3rd ed. Carol Stream: Quintessence Publishing Co,2002:24- 33
  17. Paul SJ, Peter A, Rodoni L, Pietrobon N. Conventional visual vs spectrophotometric sha