Journals / Cumhuriyet Dental Journal / 2012 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 4

Current approaches in chemomechanical caries removal methods

Kemomekanik çürük kaldırmayöntemlerinde güncel yaklaşımlar

Pages
364–372
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The purpose of this paper is to perform acomprehensive review of the literature regardingchemomechanical caries removal methods,including the most recently available caries removalagent.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The change in the concepts of cavity preparationand the production of reliable adhesive materialslead to the development of alternative methods ofcaries removal.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Painless, minimal intervention andthus giving comfort, relief and instill positiveattitude toward dental treatments, are some of thefactors justifying the specialty of pediatricdentistry.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The purpose of this paper is to perform acomprehensive review of the literature regardingchemomechanical caries removal methods,including the most recently available caries removalagent.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The change in the concepts of cavity preparationand the production of reliable adhesive materialslead to the development of alternative methods ofcaries removal. Painless, minimal intervention andthus giving comfort, relief and instill positiveattitude toward dental treatments, are some of thefactors justifying the specialty of pediatricdentistry. Chemomechanical caries removal method is a conservative and atraumatic alternative andrecently comes up again by means of developed anew chemomechanical caries removal agent papain- based gel (Papacárie®, Fórmula&Ação, Sao Paulo,Brazil). The purpose of this paper is to perform acomprehensive review of the literature regardingchemomechanical caries removal methods,including the most recently available caries removalagent.

Özet

Kavite hazırlama prensiplerindeki değişim vegüvenilir adeziv materyallerin üretilmesi, çürüğünkaldırılmasında alternatif metotların geliştirilmesine yol açmıştır. Ağrısız, minimal müdahale ve bununsağladığı konfor, güven ve diş tedavilerine olumluyaklaşım, özellikle çocuk diş hekimliğinde aranılanözelliklerdir. Kemomekanik çürük kaldırmayöntemi konservatif ve atravmatik bir alternatiftirve son zamanlarda geliştirilen yeni birkemomekanik çürük kaldırıcı ajan, papain bazlı jel(Papacárie®, Fórmula&Ação, Sao Paulo, Brezilya) sayesinde tekrar gündeme gelmektedir. Bumakalenin amacı, yeni üretilen çürük kaldırma ajanıda dahil olmak üzere kemomekanik çürük kaldırmayöntemleri ile ilgili kapsamlı bir literatür derlemesiyapmaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖLMEZ, A., KİSBET, S. (2022). Current approaches in chemomechanical caries removal methods. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 4, 364–372. https://ajindex.com/articles/477239

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Roberson TM, Heymann HO, Swift EJ. Sturdevant’s Art and Science of Operative Dentistry. 5th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2006. p. 67
  2. Pinkham JR, Casamassimo PS, Mc Tiggue DJ, Fields HW, Nowak AJ. Çocuk Diş Hekimliği (Bebeklikten Ergenliğe). Tortop T, Tulunoğlu Ö (Çev), 4. Basım. Ankara: Atlas Kitapçılık; 2009. p. 199-203
  3. Bittencourt ST, Pereira JR, Rosa AW, Oliveira KS, Ghizoni JS, Oliveira MT. Mineral content removal after Papacarie application in primary teeth: a quantitative analysis. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2010;34:229-232
  4. Motta LJ, Martins MD, Porta KP, Bussadori SK. Aesthetic restoration of deciduous anterior teeth after removal of carious tissue with Papacarie. Indian J Dent Res 2009;20:117-120
  5. Magalhaes CS, Moreira AN, Campos WR, Rossi FM, Castilho GA, Ferreira RC. Effectiveness and efficiency of chemomechanical carious dentin removal. Braz Dent J 2006;17:63-67
  6. Brunton PA. Decision-making in operative dentistry. 1st ed. London: Quintessence Publishing Co Ltd; 2002. p. 31-34
  7. Jawa D, Singh S, Somani R, Jaidka S, Sirkar K, Jaidka R. Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of chemomechanical caries removal agent (Papacarie) and conventional method of caries removal: an in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2010;28:73-77
  8. Peric T, Markovıc D, Petrovic B. Clinical evaluation of a chemomechanical method for caries removal in children and adolescents. Acta Odontol Scand 2009;67:277- 283
  9. Lozano-Chourio MA, Zambrano O, Gonzalez H, Quero M. Clinical randomized controlled trial of chemomechanical caries removal (CarisolvTM). Int J Paediatr Dent 2006;16:161-167
  10. Correa FN, Rocha RO, Filho LE, Muench A, Rodrigues CR. Chemical versus conventional caries removal techniques in primary teeth: a microhardness study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2007;31:189-194
  11. Pandit IK, Srivastava N, Gugnani N, Gupta M, Verma L. Various methods of caries removal in children: A comparative clinical study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2007;25:93-96
  12. Maragakis GM, Hahn P, Hellwig E. Clinical evaluation of chemomechanical caries removal in primary molars and its acceptance by patients. Caries Res 2001;35:205- 210
  13. Kotb RM, Abdella AA, El Kateb MA, Ahmed AM. Clinical evaluation of Papacarie in primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2009;34:117-123
  14. Chaussain-Miller C, Decup F, Domejean-Orliaguet S, Gillet D, Guigand M, Kaleka R, Laboux O, Lafont J, Medioni E, Serfaty R, Toumelin-Chemla F, Tubiana J, Lasfargues JJ. Clinical evaluation of the Carisolv c