Journals / Cumhuriyet Dental Journal / 2012 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 4

Occlusal vertical dimension and dental implants

Oklüzyon dikey boyutu ve dental implantlar

Pages
357–363
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Moderatealterations in the occlusal vertical dimension ofpatients are generally well tolerated whennecessary for therapeutic purposes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The determination of optimum occlusal verticaldimension (OVD) that is harmonious with theindividuals craniofacial system is important forprosthetic restorative procedures.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Thereview revealed that one-stage OVD increase withmoderate to severe degrees (3-16 mm, mean: 7.3mm) did not result in any complaints ortemporomandibular disorders.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Moderatealterations in the occlusal vertical dimension ofpatients are generally well tolerated whennecessary for therapeutic purposes.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The determination of optimum occlusal verticaldimension (OVD) that is harmonious with theindividuals craniofacial system is important forprosthetic restorative procedures. The purpose ofthis article was to examine the importance of OVDfor implant supported prosthetic restorations withtwo clinical reports. A computer aided literaturereview was conducted to define the articles aboutOVD and implant supported restorations. Thereview revealed that one-stage OVD increase withmoderate to severe degrees (3-16 mm, mean: 7.3mm) did not result in any complaints ortemporomandibular disorders. Regaining the OVDdid not result in relapse or any changes. Moderatealterations in the occlusal vertical dimension ofpatients are generally well tolerated whennecessary for therapeutic purposes.

Özet

Bireylerin kraniyofasiyal sistemleri ile uyumluoptimum okluzyon dikey boyutunun (ODB)belirlenmesi, protetik restorasyon yapımındaoldukça önemlidir. Bu makalenin amacı, oklüzyondikey boyutunun implant üstü protetikrestorasyonlar açısından önemini iki olgu ileirdelemektir. İmplant üstü protezler ile oklüzyondikey boyutunun ilişkisi hakkında bilgisayardestekli tarama yapılmıştır. Yapılan literatürdeğerlendirilmesinde, total diş eksikliğinde orta veyüksek düzeyde (3-16 mm, ortalama:7,3 mm)yapılan tek aşamalı dikey boyut arttırımınınherhangi bir yakınmaya ya da temporomandibulareklem düzensizliğine yol açmadığı gözlenmiştir.Yeniden kazandırılan ODB da ise değişim ya dageriye dönüş gözlenmemiştir. İmplant destekliprotetik restorasyonlarda, terapötik amaçlarnedeniyle gerekli ise ODBnun orta derecedearttırılması, hastalar tarafından iyi tolereedilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇÖMLEKOĞLU, M. E., ARTUNÇ, C., TEKEROĞLU, F., DÜNDAR, M. Ç. (2022). Occlusal vertical dimension and dental implants. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 4, 357–363. https://ajindex.com/articles/477225

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. The Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms. 7th edition 1999 Mosby (Traduction)
  2. Çalıkkocaoğlu S. Tam Protezler 1-2. Tam protezlerde kayıtların alınması ve bunların artikülatöre nakli Ankara: 4.Basım 2004;246-248
  3. Keskin H, Özdemir T, Tuncer N, Aksoy C. Gnatoloji. İstanbul: İ.Ü. Basımevi ve Film merkezi 1997;89- 92
  4. Misch CE. Clinical indications for altering vertical dimension of occlusion. Objective vs subjective methods for determining vertical dimension of occlusion. Quintessence Int 2000;31: 280-282
  5. Kois JC, Phillips KM. Occlusal vertical dimension: alteration concerns. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1997;18:1169-1180
  6. Misch CE, Günümüz Diş Hekimliğinde İmplantoloji. Ankara: Atlas Kitapçılık, 2011;235-249
  7. Ahuja S, Cagna DR. Defining available restorative space for implant overdentures. J Prosthet Dent 2010;104:133-136
  8. Gittelson, Glenn L Vertical dimension of occlusion in implant dentistry: significance and approach. Implant Dentistry: March 2002;11:33-40
  9. Ahuja S, Cagna DR. Classification and management of restorative space in edentulous implant overdenture patients. J Prosthet Dent 2011;105:332-337
  10. Chaimattayompol N, Arbree NS. Assessing the space limitation inside a complete denture for implant attachments. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:82-85
  11. Chou TM, Moore DJ, Young LJ Jr, Glaros AG, Chou JI. Occlusal vertical dimension in prosthodontics. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 1996 May;12:260-266
  12. Balshi TJ, Wolfinger GJ. Restoring lost vertical dimension of occlusion using dental implants: A clinical report. Int J Prosthodont 1996;9:473-478
  13. Nanda A, Jain V, Srivastava An electromyographic study to assess the minimal time duration for using the splint to raise the vertical dimension in patients with generalized attrition of teeth. Indian J Dent Res 2011;22:303-308
  14. Al-Quran FA, Lyons MF. The immediate effect of hard and soft splints on the EMG activity of masseter and temporalis muscles. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26:559-563
  15. Kao D, Fiorellini JP. An interarch alveoler ridge relationship classification. Int J Periodontics Restor Dent 2010;5:523-529
  16. Kendrick S, Wong D. Vertical and horizontal dimensions of implant dentistry: numbers every dentist should know. Inside Dent 2009:e4287
  17. Pound E. Lets be your guide. J Prosthetic Dent 1977;38:482-489
  18. Jensen OT, Cockrell R, Kuheke. Anterior maxillary alveolar distraction osteogenesis-a prospective 5-year clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002;17:507-516
  19. Bidez M