Journals / Cumhuriyet Dental Journal / 2012 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1

Long-term antibacterial properties of fluoride-releasing orthodontic bonding adhesives

Pages
33–42
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The level of significance was set as p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare antibacterial properties of 3 different fluoride-releasingorthodontic adhesives during three months by using the direct contact test (DCT).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: The materials tested in the present study were Transbond Plus (3M Unitek, Monrovia,USA), Light Bond (Reliance Ortho Prod.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The level of significance was set as p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare antibacterial properties of 3 different fluoride-releasingorthodontic adhesives during three months by using the direct contact test (DCT). Materials and Methods: The materials tested in the present study were Transbond Plus (3M Unitek, Monrovia,USA), Light Bond (Reliance Ortho Prod. Inc. Itasca, IL, USA), and Kurasper F (Kuraray Medical Inc.,Okayama, Japan). Eight specimens of each material type were prepared for estimation. For the DCT, wells of96-microtitre plates were coated with each of three bonding adhesives. Eight uncoated wells, using identicalinocula size, served as a positive control (bacteria with medium). A Strep tococcus mutans suspension was placedon the surface of each specimen that was held for 1 hour at 37C. Bacterial growth was monitored for 16 hourswith a temperature-controlled microplate spectrophotometer. The kinetics of the growth in each well wasrecorded continuously at 650 nm in every 30 minutes. Three additional measurements were performed on thesetested materials after aging for 1 week, 1 month and 3 months. One-way ANOVA and Tamhane s T2 multiplecomparison tests were applied to the data. The level of significance was set as p

🔖

Cite This Article

ARSLAN, U., AKSAKALLI, S., ÖZTÜRK, F., TOY, E., HATUNOĞLU, E. (2022). Long-term antibacterial properties of fluoride-releasing orthodontic bonding adhesives. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1, 33–42. https://ajindex.com/articles/477223

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Demling A, Elter C, Heidenblut T, Bach Fr-W, Hahn A, Schwestka-Polly R, Stiesch M, Heuer W. Reduction of biofilm on orthodontic brackets with the use of a polytetrafluoroethylene coating. Eur J Orthod 2010
  2. [CrossRef] 2. Tufekci E, Casagrande ZA, Lindauer SJ, Fowler CE, Williams KT. Effectiveness of an essential oil mouthrinse in improving oral health in orthodontic patients. Angle Orthod 2008
  3. [CrossRef] 3. Buren JL, Staley RN, Wefel J, Qian F. Inhibition of enamel demineralization by an enamel sealant, Pro Seal: an in- vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008
  4. [CrossRef] 4. Kocak MM, Ozcan S, Kocak S, Topuz O, Erten H. Comparison of the efficacy of three different mouthrinse solutions in decreasing the level of Strep tococcus mutans in saliva. Eur J Dent 2009
  5. Rosenbloom RG, Tinanoff N. Salivary Strep tococcus mutans levels in patients before, during, and after orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991
  6. [CrossRef] 6. Duran I, Sengun A, Hadimli HH, Ulker M. Evaluation of antibacterial effectiveness of desensitizers against oral bacteria. Eur J Dent 2008
  7. Poeta P, Igrejas G, Gonçalves A, Martins E, Araújo C, Carvalho C, Rodrigues J, Vinué L, López M, Torres C. Influence of oral hygiene in patients with fixed appliances in the oral carriage of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli and Enterococcus isolates. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009
  8. [CrossRef] 8. Sbordone L, Bortolaia C. Oral microbial biofilms and plaque related diseases: microbial communities and their role in the shift from oral health to disease. Clin Oral Invest 2003
  9. [CrossRef] 9. Uysal T, Amasyali M, Koyuturk AE, Sagdic D. Efficiency of amorphous calcium phosphate-containing orthodontic composite and resin modified glass ionomer on demineralization evaluated by a new laser fluorescence device. Eur J Dent 2009
  10. Ahn SJ, Lim BS, Lee SJ. Prevalence of cariogenic streptococci on incisor brackets detected by polymerase chain reaction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007
  11. [CrossRef] 11. Naranjo AA, Trivino ML, Jaramillo A, Betancourth M, Botero JE. Changes in the subgingival microbiota and periodontal parameters before and 3 months after bracket placement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006
  12. e17-22. [CrossRef] 12. O’Reilly MM, Featherstone JDB. Demineralization and remineralization around orthodontic appliances: an in vivo study