Journals / Cumhuriyet Dental Journal / 2012 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1

Stafne bone cavity: 3 case reports

Stafne kemik kavitesi: 3 olgu sunumu

Pages
43–47
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Theaim of this case report was to higlight the usesialography and computered tomography (CT) fordetecting stafne bone cavity (SBC) and todifferenciate other radiographic appearance such ascystic lession in the jaws.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Stafne bone cavities (SBC), which arisemandible angulus among third molar teeth, areround or ovoid-shaped, well-circumscribed,uniloküler and radiolucent lesions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Despite a wideage range seen, in men, 5. and 6. decades seenmore.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Theaim of this case report was to higlight the usesialography and computered tomography (CT) fordetecting stafne bone cavity (SBC) and todifferenciate other radiographic appearance such ascystic lession in the jaws.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Stafne bone cavities (SBC), which arisemandible angulus among third molar teeth, areround or ovoid-shaped, well-circumscribed,uniloküler and radiolucent lesions. Despite a wideage range seen, in men, 5. and 6. decades seenmore. The differential diagnosis of traumatic bonecyst, ossifying fibroma, benign lesions such asflorid osseous dysplasia and malignant lesions suchas ameloblastoma done. Supporting imagingmodalities such as sialography, computerisedtomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging(MRI) should be used for differantial diagnosis. Theaim of this case report was to higlight the usesialography and computered tomography (CT) fordetecting stafne bone cavity (SBC) and todifferenciate other radiographic appearance such ascystic lession in the jaws.

Özet

Stafne kemik kaviteleri (SKK), mandibulaangulusu ile 3. molar dişler arasında izlenenyuvarlak veya ovoid şekilli, iyi sınırlı, unilokülerve radyolüsent görüntü veren lezyonlardır. Görülmeyaşı çok geniş bir aralığa sahip olmasına rağmen,erkeklerde 5. ve 6. dekatlarda daha fazlagörülmektedir. Ayırıcı tanısı travmatik kemik kisti,ossifiye fibroma ve florid osseoz displazi gibibening lezyonların yanı sıra ameloblastoma gibimalign lezyonlarla yapılmaktadır. Ayırıcı tanıdasialografi, bilgisayarlı tomografi (BT) veyamagnetik rezonans görüntüleme (MRG) gibidestekleyici görüntüleme yöntemlerindenyararlanılmalıdır. Bu olgu sunumunda, sialografi vebilgisayarlı tomografi (BT) tekniğinin stafne kemikkavite (SKK) görüntüsünün belirlenmesi veçenelerde görülen diğer kistik görüntülerle ayırıcıtanıda kullanılmasının önemi değerlen- dirilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇELEBİOĞLU, B. G., TÜRKOĞLU, K., KARADENİZ, S. N. (2022). Stafne bone cavity: 3 case reports. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1, 43–47. https://ajindex.com/articles/477219

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Adra NA, Barakat N, Melhem RE. Salivary gland inclusion in the mandible: Stafne’s idiopathic bone cavity. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1980;134:1082-1083
  2. Barak S, Katz J, Mintz S. Anterior lingual mandibular salivary gland defect: a dilemma in diagnosis. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1993;31:318– 320. [CrossRef] 3. Barker G. A radiolucency of the ascending ramus of the mandible associated with investid parotid salivary gland material and analogous with a Stafne bone cavity. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1988;26:81-84
  3. Barker G. Xeroradiography in relation to a Stafne bone cavity. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1988;26:32-35. [CrossRef] 5. Branstetter BF, Weissman JL, Kaplan SB. Imaging of a Stafne bone cavity: what MR adds and why a new name is needed. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20(4):587-589
  4. Campos P, Panella J, Crusoé-Rebello I, Azevedo R, Pena N, Cunha T. Mandibular ramus-related Stafne’s bone cavity. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004;33:63-66
  5. Correll RW, Jensen JL, Rhyne RR. Lingual cortical mandibular defects: a radiographic incidence study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1980;50:287–291. [CrossRef] 8. de Courten A, Kuffer R, Samson J, Lombardi T. Anterior lingual mandibular salivary gland defect (Stafne defect) presenting as a residual cyst. Oral Surg Oral Med oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002;94:460-464
  6. Grau J, Gay Escoda C, Hernández F. Cavidad de Stafne. Revisión a propósito de 6 casos. Av Odontoestomatol 1991;7:83-87
  7. Grellner T, Frost D, Brannon R. Lingual mandibular bone defect: Report of three cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990;48:288-296. [CrossRef] 11. Kao YH, Huang IY, Chen CM, Wu CW, Hsu KJ, Chen CM. Late mandibular fracture after lower third molar extraction in a patient with Stafne bone cavity: a case report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;68(7):1698-1700. [CrossRef] 12. Katz J, Chaushu G, Rotstein I. Stafne’s bone cavity in the anterior mandible: A posible diagnostic challenge. J Endod 2001;27:304-307
  8. Lello GE, Makek M. Stafne’s mandibular cortical defect: discussion of aetiology. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1985;13:172-176
  9. Lewandowski L, Osmola K, Marcinkowski M, Iwanik K. Atypical Stafne bone cavity of the mandible. Otolaryngol Pol 2006;60(2):203-205
  10. Philipsen H, Takata T, Reichart P, Sato S, Suei Y. Lingual and buccal mandibular bone depressiones:A review based on 583 cases from a world-wide literature survey, including 69 new cases from Japan. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2002;31:281- 289
  11. Phillips A, Yates C. Case report: Ante