Journals / Cumhuriyet Dental Journal / 2013 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2

The evaluation of effects on the strength of marginal ridge of various restorative materials in tunnel restorations: an in vitro study

Farklı restoratif materyallerin tünel restorasyonların marjinal sırt dayanıklılığ ı üzerine etkilerinin in vitro olarak değ erlendirilmesi

Pages
104–109
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The difference between groups was found statistically significant (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of a restorative glass-ionomer cement (Fuji IX Capsule), a flowable composite resin (Tetric Flow) and an undirection S2 glass fiber combined with flowable composite resin (Tetic Flow + Splint-it) on marginal ridge strength in approximal caries which were not included the marginal ridge.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: For this reason, thirty freshly extracted and without caries or marginal ridge defect second premolar teeth were selected.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The difference between groups was found statistically significant (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of a restorative glass-ionomer cement (Fuji IX Capsule), a flowable composite resin (Tetric Flow) and an undirection S2 glass fiber combined with flowable composite resin (Tetic Flow + Splint-it) on marginal ridge strength in approximal caries which were not included the marginal ridge. Materials and Methods: For this reason, thirty freshly extracted and without caries or marginal ridge defect second premolar teeth were selected. The data obtained from samples subjected to the marginal ridge strength test were statistically analyzed with one-way ANAVO and LSD multiple range test. Results: The highest mean value was obtained from flowable composite plus fiber material and the lowest mean value was obtained from Fuji IX capsule material. The difference between groups was found statistically significant (p

Özet

Amaç: Çalış mamızın amacı, marjinal sırtı içine almayan ara yüz çürüklerinde, ultra konservatif yaklaş ım olan tünel restorasyonlarında, restoratif cam ionomer siman (Fuji IX Kapsül), akıcı kompozit rezin (Tetric Flow) ve akıcı kompozit rezin ile kombine edilmiş olan bir tek yönlü S2 cam fiberin (Tetric Flow + Splint-it) marjinal sırt dayanıklılığ ı üzerine etkilerinin incelenmesidir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu amaçla herhangi bir çürük ve marjinal sırt defekti bulunmayan 30 adet çekilmiş 2. küçük azı diş i kullanılmış tır. Marjinal sırt fraktürü basınç testi iş lemine tabi tutulan örneklerden elde edilmiş olan ortalama değ erlere tek yönlü varyans analizi ve LSD çoklu karş ılaş tırma testi uygulanmış tır. Bulgular: En yüksek ortalama değ er akıcı kompozit + fiber materyalinden, en düş ük ortalama değ er ise Fuji IX Kapsül materyalinden elde edilmiş tir. Gruplar arasındaki farklılık istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulunmuş tur (p

🔖

Cite This Article

BELDÜZ, N. K., YILMAZ, Y., EYÜPOĞLU, Ö. (2022). The evaluation of effects on the strength of marginal ridge of various restorative materials in tunnel restorations: an in vitro study. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2, 104–109. https://ajindex.com/articles/477212

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Jinks GM. Fluoride-impregnated cements and their effect on the activity of interproximal caries. J Dent Child 1963;30:87-92
  2. Tyas MJ. Clinical evaluation of glass- ionomer cement restorations. J Appl Oral Sci 2006;14:10-13
  3. Wiegand A, Attin T. Treatment of proximal caries lesions by tunnel restorations. Dent Mater 2007;23:1461- 1467
  4. Smith DC. Composition and characteristics of glass ionomer cements. J Am Dent Assoc 1990;120:20-22
  5. Celik EU, Ermis B. Koruyucu rezin uygulamasının yüksek viskoziteli geleneksel cam iyonomer simanın mikrosertliğ i üzerine etkisinin in vitro olarak değ erlendirilmesi. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Diş Hek Fak Derg 2008;11:87-90
  6. Mickenautsch S, Mount G, Yengopal V. Therapeutic effect of glass- ionomers: an overview of evidence. Aust Dent J 2011;56:10-15
  7. Kupietzky A, Houpt M, Mellberg J, Shey Z. Fluoride exchange from glass ionomer preventive resin restorations. Pediatr Dent 1994;16:340-345
  8. Markovic D, Peric T. Clinical evaluation of glass-ionomer tunnel restorations in primary molars: 36 months results. Aust Dent J 2008;53:41-45
  9. Lumley PJ, Fisher FJ. Tunnel restorations: a long-term pilot study over a minimum of five years. J Dent 1995;23:213-215
  10. Frankenberger R, Sindel J, Krämer N. Viscous glass-ionomer cements: a new alternative to amalgam in the primary dentition? Quintessence Int 1997;28:667-676
  11. Ş ener Y, Koyutürk AE. Üç farklı cam iyonomer simanın yüzey sertliklerinin karş ılaş tırılması. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Diş Hek Fak Derg 2006;9:91-94
  12. Bayne SC, Thompson JY, Swift EJ Jr, Stamatiades P, Wilkerson M. A characterization of first-generation flowable composites. J Am Dent Assoc 1998;129:567-577
  13. Covey D, Schulein TM, Kohout FJ. Marginal ridge strength of restored teeth with modified Class II cavity preparations. J Am Dent Assoc 1989;118(2):199-202
  14. Mondelli J, Steagall L, Ishikiriama A, de Lima Navarro MF, Soares FB. Fracture strength of human teeth with cavity preparations. J Prosthet Dent 1980;43(4):419-422
  15. Larson TD, Douglas WH, Geistfeld RE. Effect of prepared cavities on the strength of teeth. Oper Dent 1981;6:2- 5
  16. Strand GV, Tveit AB, Gjerdet NR, Eide GE. Marginal ridge strength of teeth with tunnel preparations. Int Dent J 1995;45:117–123
  17. Ehrnford LE, Fransson H. Compressive fracture resistance of the marginal ridge in large Class II tunnels restored with cermet and composite resin. Swed Dent J 1994;18:207-211
  18. Strand GV, Tveit AB. Effectiveness of c