Journals / Cumhuriyet Dental Journal / 2013 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1

Surgical treatment of acut and chronic oroantral comunications: a clinical study of 33 cases

Akut ve kronik oroantral açıklıkların cerrahi tedavisi: 33 vakalık klinik çalış ma

Pages
40–49
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In all cases, tooth extraction was the only etiologic factor. 100% (20/20) success was achieved in all patients with acute openings, while the rate was 77% (13/10) in patients with oroantral fistula.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Oroantral comunications are known as pathological connections occuring between the oral cavity and maxillary sinus.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study; age, sex, etiologic factors, location of the opening, methods of treatment and early complications of 33 patients that surgically treated in Ondokuz Mayıs University, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinic between 2005-2011 were examined. 18 (54.54%) of oroantral openings were treated with buccal advancement flap, 4 (12.12%) of them were treated with palatal rotational flap, 8 (24.24%) of them were treated with iodoform gauze pack strip and the remaining 3 (9.09%) cases were treated with buccal fat pad, double-tunnel method and primary closure.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In all cases, tooth extraction was the only etiologic factor. 100% (20/20) success was achieved in all patients with acute openings, while the rate was 77% (13/10) in patients with oroantral fistula.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2005-2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Oroantral comunications are known as pathological connections occuring between the oral cavity and maxillary sinus. Early treatment of this condition prevents the development of sinusitis and fistula, as well as the need for more complex methods of treating patients and the possibility of recurrence. In this study; age, sex, etiologic factors, location of the opening, methods of treatment and early complications of 33 patients that surgically treated in Ondokuz Mayıs University, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinic between 2005-2011 were examined. 18 (54.54%) of oroantral openings were treated with buccal advancement flap, 4 (12.12%) of them were treated with palatal rotational flap, 8 (24.24%) of them were treated with iodoform gauze pack strip and the remaining 3 (9.09%) cases were treated with buccal fat pad, double-tunnel method and primary closure. In all cases, tooth extraction was the only etiologic factor. 100% (20/20) success was achieved in all patients with acute openings, while the rate was 77% (13/10) in patients with oroantral fistula.

Özet

Oroantral açıklıklar, ağ ız kavitesi ve maksiller sinüs arasında meydana gelen patolojik bağ lantı olarak bilinmektedir. Bu durumun erken dönem tedavisi, sinüzit ve fistül geliş imini önlediğ i gibi, hastaların daha komplike yöntemlerle tedavi gereksinimlerini ve nüks olasılığ ını da önlemektedir. Bu çalış mada, 2005-2011 tarihleri arasında Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliğ i Fakültesi Ağ ız, Diş ve Çene Cerrahisi kliniğ inde cerrahi tedavisi gerçekleş tirilen akut veya kronik açıklığ a sahip 33 hastanın yaş , cinsiyet, etyolojik faktörler, açıklığ ın lokalizasyonu, gerçekleş tirilen tedavi yöntemleri ve erken dönem komplikasyonları incelenmiş tir. Oroantral açıklıkların, 18i (%54,54) bukkal ilerletme flebi, 4ü (%12,12) palatal döndürme flebi, 8i (24,24) gaz iodoform ile kapatma, kalan 3 olgu ise (%9,09) bukkal yağ yastığ ı, çift tünel yöntemi ve primer kapatma yöntemi ile tedavi edilmiş tir. Bütün olgularda diş çekimi tek etiyolojik faktör olarak bulunmuş tur. Akut açıklığ a sahip olguların hepsinde % 100 (20/20) baş arı sağ lanırken, kronik açıklığ a (oroantral fistül) sahip olgularda ise bu oran % 77 (13/10) de kalmış tır.

🔖

Cite This Article

BEREKET, C., ÖZKAN, E., ŞENEL, E., KAYNAR, M., ŞENER, İ. (2022). Surgical treatment of acut and chronic oroantral comunications: a clinical study of 33 cases. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1, 40–49. https://ajindex.com/articles/477204

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Yilmaz T, Suslu AE, Gursel B. Treatment of oroantral fistula: experience with 27 cases. Am J Otolaryngol 2003;24(4):221-223
  2. Abuabara A, Cortez AL, Passeri LA, de Moraes M, Moreira RW. Evaluation of different treatments for oroantral/oronasal communications: experience of 112 cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006;35(2):155- 158
  3. Skoglund LA, Pedersen SS, Holst E. Surgical management of 85 perforations to the maxillary sinus. Int J Oral Surg 1983;12(1):1-5
  4. Visscher SH, van Minnen B, Bos RR. Closure of oroantral communications: a review of the literature. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;68(6):1384-1391
  5. Punwutikorn J, Waikakul A, Pairuchvej V. Clinically significant oroantral communications--a study of incidence and site. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994;23(1):19-21
  6. Thoma K, Pajarola GF, Grätz KW, Schmidlin PR. Bioabsorbable root analogue for closure of oroantral communications after tooth extraction: a prospective case-cohort study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006;101(5):558-564
  7. Güven O. A clinical study on oroantral fistulae. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1998;26(4):267-271
  8. Özdemir H. Aladağ Lİ. Sonradan kazanılmış bir maksiller defektin protetik obturasyonu: bir olgu sunumu. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek. Fak. Derg 2011;(4):122-127
  9. Anavi Y, Gal G, Silfen R, Calderon S. Palatal rotation-advancement flap for delayed repair of oroantral fistula: a retrospective evaluation of 63 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003;96(5):527-534
  10. Tilaveridis I, Lazaridou M, Dimitrakopoulos I, Lazaridis N, Charis C. Displacement of three dental implants into the maxillary sinus in two patients. Report of two cases. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;16(3):311-314
  11. Norman JE. Oroantral fistula. Aust Dent J 1977;22(4):284-288
  12. DeFreitas J, Lucente FE. The Caldwell-Luc procedure: institutional review of 670 cases: 1975-1985. Laryngoscope 1988;98(12):1297- 1300
  13. Yalçın S, Oncü B, Emes Y, Atalay B, Aktaş I. Surgical treatment of oroantral fistulas: a clinical study of 23 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;69(2):333-339. 14. von Wowern N. Frequency of oroantral fistulae after perforation to the maxillary sinus. Scand J Dent Res 1970;78(5):394-396
  14. Hanazawa Y, Itoh K, Mabashi T, Sato K. Closure of oroantral communications using a pedicled buccal fat pad graft. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995;53(7):771- 775
  15. McMahon P, Tzadik A. Paget's disease of the bone presenting as an 48 apparent oral antral fistula. Arch Otol