Journals / Cumhuriyet Dental Journal / 2013 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 3

Total and partial ear epithesis : two case reports with review of literature

Pages
221–225
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The success of both 2 epithesis compared in terms of function, aesthetics and psychological activity.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Auricular defects may be congenitally or occur secondary to trauma or surgical removal of a neoplasm.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the present study, 2 patients (a partial and a total auricular defects) were rehabilitated with epistheses that were constructed on endosteal titanium implants of the ITI system with magnetive anchors in mastoid process.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The success of both 2 epithesis compared in terms of function, aesthetics and psychological activity.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Auricular defects may be congenitally or occur secondary to trauma or surgical removal of a neoplasm. Treatment options for the reconstruction of the ear may include either plastic surgery or provision of an auricular prosthesis. The requirements of prosthesis are esthetics, retention and stability, alignment and positioning, biocompatibility, and longevity. In the present study, 2 patients (a partial and a total auricular defects) were rehabilitated with epistheses that were constructed on endosteal titanium implants of the ITI system with magnetive anchors in mastoid process. The success of both 2 epithesis compared in terms of function, aesthetics and psychological activity.

🔖

Cite This Article

DOĞAN, M., ÖZDEMİR, A. K., ÖZDEMİR, D. D., ŞEKER, E., TURGUT, F. (2022). Total and partial ear epithesis : two case reports with review of literature. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 3, 221–225. https://ajindex.com/articles/477196

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Bulbulian AH. Facial Prosthesis. Springfield, IL: Charles C.Thomas, 1973
  2. Beumer J, Curtis TA, Marunick MT. Maxillofacial rehabilitation: prosthodontic and surgical considerations. St.Louis: Medico Dental Media Intl; 1996
  3. Parel SM. Diminishing dependence on adhesives for retention of facial prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent 1980;43:552-560
  4. Guo G, Schwedtner O, Klein M. A retrospective study of implant - retained auricular prosthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23:539-543
  5. Wilkes GH, Wolfaardt JF. Osseointegrated alloplastic versus autogenous ear reconstruction: Criteria for treatment selection. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994;93:967-979
  6. Tjellström A. Osseointegrated systems and their applications in the head and neck. Adv Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989;3:39–70
  7. Tjellström A, Jacobsson M. The bone-anchored maxillofacial prosthesis the Branemark osseointegrated implant. Chicago: Quintessence; 1989
  8. Tjellström A, Yountchev E, Lindström J. Five years experience with bone-anchored auricular prostheses. Otolaryngol HeadNeck Surg 1985;93:366-372
  9. Nishimura RD, Roumanas E, Sugal T, Moy PK. Airucular prostheses and osseointegrated implants. UCLA experience. J Prosthet Dent 1995;75:553-558
  10. Wazen JJ, Wright R, Hatfield RB, Asher ES. Auricular rehabilitation with bone-anchored titanium implants. Laryngoscope 1999;109:523-527
  11. Payne AG, Solomons YF. Mandibular implant-supported overdentures: a prospective evaluation of the burden of prosthodontic maintenance with 3 different attachment systems. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:246-253
  12. Walmsley AD, Frame JW. Implant- supported overdenture—the Birmingham experience. J Dent 1997;25:43-47
  13. Reisberg DJ, Habakuk SW. Nasal conformer to restore facial contour. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:699–701
  14. Gurbuz A, Kalkan M, Ozturk AN, Eskitascioglu G. Nasal prosthesis rehabilitation: A case report. Quintessence Int 2004;35:655-656
  15. Kubon TM, Kurtz KS, Piro JD. Impression procedure for creating a partial auricular prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83(6):648-651
  16. Chen D, Johnson JT, Zini I, Myers EN, Aramany MA. Prosthetic auricular reconstruction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1983;91(5):556- 558.