The article of dental ceramics,history, structure, classification and properties are discussed.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The metal-ceramic restorations successfully used in the past to the present day after toothextraction.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However, more esthetic restorative materials are most popular than metal-ceramicrestorations, with the increase of interest in patients esthetic restorative materials, Full ceramicrestorations are most aesthetic than metal-ceramic restorations.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The article of dental ceramics,history, structure, classification and properties are discussed.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Abstract
The metal-ceramic restorations successfully used in the past to the present day after toothextraction. However, more esthetic restorative materials are most popular than metal-ceramicrestorations, with the increase of interest in patients esthetic restorative materials, Full ceramicrestorations are most aesthetic than metal-ceramic restorations. Howewer, because of its highbiocompatibility, low plaque retention, creating less irritation of gums and creating less riskof allergies properties full ceramic restorations are often used. The article of dental ceramics,history, structure, classification and properties are discussed.
🔖
Cite This Article
KİRMALİ, Ö. (2022). Dental ceramics used in dentistry. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3, 316–324. https://ajindex.com/articles/477154
Anusavice K. Phillips Science of Dental Materials. Saunders, 11th ed., Florida 2003; 660-663
Kelly JR, Nishimura I, Campbell SD. Ceramics in dentistry: historical roots and current perspectives. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:18-32
Guazzato M, Albakry M, Ringer SP, Swain MV. Strength, fracture toughness and microstructure of a selection of all-ceramic materials. Part I. Pressable and alumina glass- infiltrated ceramics. Dent Mater 2004;20:441-8
Raigrodski AJ. Contemporary materials and technologies for all- ceramic fixed partial dentures: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:557-62
Yilmaz H, Aydin C, Gul BE. Flexural strength and fracture toughness of dental core ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 2007; 98:120-8
Craig R. Restorative Dental Materials. Mosby, 10th ed., St Louis. 1996;467-468
Nayır E. Diş Hekimliği Maddeler Bilgisi. (7.baskı) İ.Ü Basımevi. İstanbul, 1999;64-89
Conrad HJ, Seong WJ, Pesun IJ. Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2007;98:389-404
Heffernan MJ, Aquilino SA, Diaz-Arnold AM, Haselton DR, Stanford CM, Vargas MA. Relative translucency of six all- ceramic systems. Part II: core and veneer materials. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:10-5
Höland W. Biocompatible And Bioactive Glass-Ceramics - State Of The Art And New Directions. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids 1997;219:192-197
Fradeani M, Redemagni M. An 11- year clinical evaluation of leucite- reinforced glass-ceramic crowns: a retrospective study. Quintessence Int 2002;33:503-10
Quinn JB, Sundar V, Lloyd IK. Influence of microstructure and chemistry on the fracture toughness of dental ceramics. Dent Mater 2003;19:603-11
Sorensen J. The IPS Empress 2 system: defining the possibilities. Quintessence Dent Technol 1999;22:153-163
Fasbinder DJ. Restorative material options for CAD/CAM restorations. Compend Contin Educ Dent, 2002; 23:911-6, 918, 920, 924
Haselton DR, Diaz-Arnold AM, Hillis SL. Clinical assessment of high-strength all-ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 83:396-401
Xiao-ping L, Jie-mo T, Yun-long Z, Ling W. Strength and fracture toughness of MgO-modified glass infiltrated alumina for CAD/CAM. Dent Mater 2002;18:216-20
Broschure V. VITA In-Ceram Alumina. Directions for use Fabrication of the framework In the slip-casting technique. 2005
Magen P, Besler U. Esthetic improvements and in vitro testing of In-Ceram Alumina and Spinell cerami