Journals / Cumhuriyet Dental Journal / 2014 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 4

The relation between periodontal status and halitosis among different patient groups

Farklı Hasta Gruplarında Periodontal Durum ile Halitozis İlişkisinin Değerlendirilmesi

Pages
350–360
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusions: Yongue coating was found to be the most decisive factor in estimating the odorscore by both devices.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: Halimeter which a portable sulfide monitors, and Oral Chroma which a portablegas chromatograph, are devices that are widely used in the diagnosis of halitosis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Thirty patients with periodontitis, 30 patients receiving orthodontictreatment and 30 healthy subjects were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusions: Yongue coating was found to be the most decisive factor in estimating the odorscore by both devices.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: Halimeter which a portable sulfide monitors, and Oral Chroma which a portablegas chromatograph, are devices that are widely used in the diagnosis of halitosis. The purposeof this study is to determine the amount of volatile sulfur compounds of periodontal healthyvolunteers, periodontitis, and individuals having orthodontic treatment by Halimeter and OralChroma and to perform comparisons between the groups in the levels of halitosis. Materials and Methods: Thirty patients with periodontitis, 30 patients receiving orthodontictreatment and 30 healthy subjects were included in the study. Volatile sulfur compounds valueof a total of 90 patients was measured by Halimeter and Oral Chroma. Results: Oral halitosis measurements between the three groups did not differ significantlybetween Oral Chroma and Halimeter. Tongue coating index, plaque index, gingival index, andprobing pocket depth with the value of Oral Chroma and Halimeter results of oral halitosisshowed a linear correlation in periodontitis group. Tongue coating index, and plaque index withthe value of Oral Chroma and Halimeter results of oral halitosis showed a linear correlation inhealthy group. Tongue coating index with the value of Oral Chroma and Halimeter results of oralhalitosis showed a linear correlation in orthodontic group. Conclusions: Yongue coating was found to be the most decisive factor in estimating the odorscore by both devices.

Özet

maç: Taşınabilir bir sülfit monitörü olan Halimetre ve yine taşınabilir bir gaz kromatograf olanOral Chroma, ağız kokusu teşhisinde yaygın olarak kullanılmakta olan cihazlardır. Bu çalışmanınamacı; periodontal açıdan sağlıklı, periodontitisli ve ortodontik tedavi gören bireylerde klinikperiodontal değerler ile uçucu sülfür bileşikleri miktarlarının Oral Chroma ve Halimetreyardımıyla belirlenmesi ve halitozis düzeylerinin gruplar arası kıyaslamalarının yapılmasıdır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmaya 30 Periodontitisli, 30 ortodontik tedavi gören ve 30 sağlıklıbirey dahil edilmiştir. Toplam 90 bireyin nefeslerindeki uçucu sülfür bileşik değerleri hem OralChroma ile hem de Halimetre cihazı ile ölçülmüştür. Bulgular: Gruplar arasındaki ağız kokusu ölçümlerinde Oral Chroma ve Halimetre arasındafarklılık gözlenmemiştir. Periodontitisli grupta Halimetre ve Oral Chroma ölçüm değeri ile dilkaplama indeksi, plak indeksi, gingival indeks ve sondalama cep derinliği doğrusal bir ilişkigösterirken, sağlıklı grupta dil kaplama indeksi ve plak indeksi, ortodontik tedavi gören gruptaise sadece dil kaplama indeksi doğrusal bir ilişki göstermiştir.Sonuçlar: Dil kaplamasının her iki cihazda da koku skorunun tahmin edilmesinde en belirleyicifaktör olduğu bulunmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖKTÜRK, Ö., DEVRİM, İ. (2022). The relation between periodontal status and halitosis among different patient groups. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 4, 350–360. https://ajindex.com/articles/477141

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Tonzeitch J. Production and origin of oral malodor: A Review of mechanisms and methods of analysis. J Periodontol. 1977; 48: 13−20
  2. Delanghe G, Ghyselen J, Feenstra L, van Steenberghe D. Experiences of a Belgian multidisciplinary breath odour clinic. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg. 1997; 51: 43−48
  3. Delanghe G, Ghyselen J, van Steenberghe D, Feenstra L. Multidisciplinary breath-Odour clinic. Lancet 1997; 350: 187
  4. Morita M, Wang HL. Association between oral malodor and adult periodontitis: a review. J Clin Periodontol. 2001; 28: 813–819 5. Sanz M, Roldán S, Herrera D. Fundamentals of breath malodour. J Contemp Dent Pract 2001; 2: 1-17
  5. Kleinberg I, Westbay G. Salivary and metabolic factors involved in oral malodor formation. J Periodontol. 1992; 63:768-775
  6. Quirynen M, Zhao H, van Steenberghe D. Review of the treatment strategies for oral malodour. Clin Oral Investig. 2002; 6: 1-10
  7. Zachrisson S, Zachrisson BU. Gingival condition associated with orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod. 1972; 42: 26-34
  8. Levin L, Samorodnitzky-Naveh GR, Machtei EE. The association of orthodontic treatment and fixed retainers with gingival health. J Periodontol. 2008;79: 2087-2092
  9. Zachrisson BU. Cause and prevention of injuries to teeth and supporting structures during orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod. 1976; 69: 285-300
  10. Mitchell L. Decalcification during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances: an overview. Br J Orthod. 1992; 19: 199-205
  11. Rosenberg M, Kulkarni GV, Bosy A, McCulloch CAG. Reproducibility and sensitivity of oral malodour measurements with a portable sulphide monitor. J Dent Res. 1991; 70: 1436-1400
  12. Kim DJ, Lee JY, Kho HS, Chung JW, Park HK, Kim YK. A new organoleptic testing method for evaluating halitosis. J Periodontol. 2009; 80: 93-97
  13. Hughes FJ, McNab R. Oral malodour-a review. Arch Oral Biol. 2008; 53:1-7
  14. Annemiek MWT, Van den Broek, Louw F, Cees de Baat. A review of the current literature on aetiology and measurement methods of halitosis. J Dent. 2007; 35: 627– 635
  15. Tangerman A, Winkel EG. The portable gas chromatograph OralChromaTM: a method of choice to detect oral and extra-oral halitosis. J Breath Res. 2008; 2: 1-7
  16. Murata T, Rahardjo A, Fujiyama Y, Yamaga T, Hanada M, Yaegaki K, Miyazaki H. Development of compact and simple gas chromatography for oral malodor measurement. J Periodontol. 2006; 77: 1142-1147
  17. Bosy A. Oral malodor: philosophical and practical aspects. J Can Dent Assoc. 1997; 6