SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Cumhuriyet Dental Journal / 2015 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1

Effect of glide path preparation on apical debris extrusion of rotary and reciprocating single-file systems: OneShape versus WaveOne

Baran Can SAĞLAM
Sevinç TÜRKER AKTEMUR
Sibel KOÇAK
Mıstafa Murat KOÇAK
Pages
1–8
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusions: Creation of a glide path does not significantly affect the apically extruded debris.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: To assess the effect of glide path on the amount of apically extruded debris afterinstrumentation with WaveOne and OneShape.Materials & Methods: Forty-eight extracted human mandibular incisors were assigned to4 groups.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In groups 1 and 2, preparation was completed with WaveOne, in groups 3 and 4 canalswere prepared with OneShape.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusions: Creation of a glide path does not significantly affect the apically extruded debris.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the effect of glide path on the amount of apically extruded debris afterinstrumentation with WaveOne and OneShape.Materials & Methods: Forty-eight extracted human mandibular incisors were assigned to4 groups. In groups 1 and 2, preparation was completed with WaveOne, in groups 3 and 4 canalswere prepared with OneShape. Before instrumentation, in groups 1 and 3, glide path was createdwith PathFile 1, 2, and 3 at working length, whereas in groups 2 and 4, glide path was notperformed. The weight of the extruded debris for each group was calculated by comparing thepre- and post-instrumentation weights of the eppendorf tubes. The time required for reachingfull WL was also recorded. Data were analysed by Kruskal Wallis and Mann Whitney U tests.Results: There was no difference in the amount of debris extruded between the single filesystems (P=0.234). Time required to reach full WL was significantly decreased by creating aglide path (P< 0.05). Conclusions: Creation of a glide path does not significantly affect the apically extruded debris.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAĞLAM, B. C., AKTEMUR, S. T., KOÇAK, S., KOÇAK, M. M. (2022). Effect of glide path preparation on apical debris extrusion of rotary and reciprocating single-file systems: OneShape versus WaveOne. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1, 1–8. https://ajindex.com/articles/477105

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Peters OA. Current challenges and concepts in the preparation of root canal systems: a review. J Endod 2004;30:559-567
  2. Seltzer S, Naidorf IJ. Flare-ups in endodontics: I. Etiological factors. J Endod 1985;11:472-478
  3. Seltzer S, Naidorf IJ. Flare-ups in endodontics: II. Therapeutic measures. J Endod 1985;11:559-567. 4. al-Omari MA, Dummer PM. Canal blockage and debris extrusion with eight preparation techniques. J Endod 1995;21:154-158
  4. Kustarci A, Akpinar KE, Sumer Z, Er K, Bek B. Apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria following use of various instrumentation techniques. Int Endod J 2008;41:1066-1071
  5. Kustarci A, Akdemir N, Siso SH, Altunbas D. Apical extrusion of intracanal debris using two engine driven and step-back instrumentation techniques: an in-vitro study. Eur J Dent 2008;2:233-239
  6. Ferraz CC, Gomes NV, Gomes BP, Zaia AA, Teixeira FB, Souza-Filho FJ. Apical extrusion of debris and irrigants using two hand and three engine- driven instrumentation techniques. Int Endod J 2001;34:354-358
  7. Johnson E, Lloyd A, Kuttler S, Namerow K. Comparison between a novel nickel-titanium alloy and 508 nitinol on the cyclic fatigue life of ProFile 25/.04 rotary instruments. J Endod 2008;34:1406-1409
  8. Burklein S, Benten S, Schafer E. Shaping ability of different single- file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. Int Endod J 2013;46:590-597
  9. Berutti E, Cantatore G, Castellucci A, Chiandussi G, Pera F, Migliaretti G, et al. Use of nickel-titanium rotary PathFile to create the glide path: comparison with manual preflaring in simulated root canals. J Endod 2009;35:408-412
  10. Patino PV, Biedma BM, Liebana CR, Cantatore G, Bahillo JG. The influence of a manual glide path on the separation rate of NiTi rotary instruments. J Endod 2005;31:114-116
  11. Berutti E, Negro AR, Lendini M, Pasqualini D. Influence of manual preflaring and torque on the failure rate of ProTaper rotary instruments. J Endod 2004;30:228-230
  12. McKendry DJ. Comparison of balanced forces, endosonic, and step-back filing instrumentation techniques: quantification of extruded apical debris. J Endod 1990;16:24-27
  13. Hinrichs RE, Walker WA, 3rd, Schindler WG. A comparison of amounts of apically extruded debris using handpiece-driven nickel- titanium instrument systems. J Endod 1998;24:102-106
  14. Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1971;32:271-275
  15. Myers GL, Montgomery