SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Cumhuriyet Dental Journal / 2015 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2

The evalution of stress distributions in 3 and 5 unit dental and implant supported fixed zirconia restorations: finite element analysis

Sedat GUVEN
Köksal BEYDEMİR
Veysel ERATİLLA
Serkan DUNDAR
Pages
128–140
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In posterior restorations increased in the number of supported teeth and implant can reduce the destructive forces on teeth and implant and may allow longer period retention of the restorations in the mouth.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: In this study, it is aimed to compare the distribution of stress on teeth and implants in 3-and-5-unit-dental and implant supported zirconia restorations by using finite element analysis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Method: Stress distribution formed in teeth and implants as a result of chewing forces was analyzed in dental and implant (Astra Tech Microthread Osseo Speed, Sweeden) supported models of zirconia restoration with 5-unit placed on the numbers of 43, 44, 45, 46 and 47 and with 3-unit placed on the number of 45, 46 and 47.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In posterior restorations increased in the number of supported teeth and implant can reduce the destructive forces on teeth and implant and may allow longer period retention of the restorations in the mouth.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: In this study, it is aimed to compare the distribution of stress on teeth and implants in 3-and-5-unit-dental and implant supported zirconia restorations by using finite element analysis. Material and Method: Stress distribution formed in teeth and implants as a result of chewing forces was analyzed in dental and implant (Astra Tech Microthread Osseo Speed, Sweeden) supported models of zirconia restoration with 5-unit placed on the numbers of 43, 44, 45, 46 and 47 and with 3-unit placed on the number of 45, 46 and 47. The study was performed through static nonlinear analysis with the three-dimensional finite element analysis method. Results: The highest and the lowest stress were respectively found on the number of 45 and 47 in 3-unit tooth supported model. The highest and the lowest stress in 5-unit tooth supported model were respectively found on the tooth of number 45 and on the root apex of the implant of number 43. Stress accumulation was observed in the cervical portion of the implant in implantsupported models. Stress accumulation in the tooth-supported model was found less than in implant-supported modelsConclusion: The extreme forces on the dental and implant-supported restorations with increased units can reduce survival rate of restorations in mouth. In posterior restorations increased in the number of supported teeth and implant can reduce the destructive forces on teeth and implant and may allow longer period retention of the restorations in the mouth.

🔖

Cite This Article

GUVEN, S., BEYDEMİR, K., ERATİLLA, V., DUNDAR, S. (2022). The evalution of stress distributions in 3 and 5 unit dental and implant supported fixed zirconia restorations: finite element analysis. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2, 128–140. https://ajindex.com/articles/477102

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Branemark PI, Adell R, Breine U, Hansson BO, Lindstrom J, Ohlsson A. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1969;3:81-100.
  2. Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, Behneke A, Behneke N, Hirt HP, et al. Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:161-172. Christensen GJ. Ceramics vs. porcelain fused to metal crowns: give your patients a choise. J Am Dent Assoc 1994;125:311-312,314. Hansen PA, West LA. Allergic reaction following insertion of a Pd- Cu-Au fixed partial denture: a clinical report. J Prosthodont 1997;6:144- 148. Vult von Steyern P, Carlson P, Nilner K. All-ceramic fixed partial dentures designed according to the DC-Zirkon technique. A 2-year clinical study. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32:180-187.
  3. Piwowarczyk A, Ottl P, Lauer HC, Kuretzky T. A clinical report and overview of scientific studies and clinical procedures conducted on the 3M ESPE Lava All-Ceramic System. J Prosthodont 2005;14:39-45.
  4. Studart AR, Filser F, Kocher P, Luthy H, Gauckler LJ. Cyclic fatigue in water of veneer-framework composites for all-ceramic dental bridges. Dent Mater 2007;23:177-185.
  5. Rismanchian M, Shafiei S, Nourbakhshian F, Davoudi A. Flexural strengths of implant- supported zirconia based bridges in posterior regions. J Adv Prosthodont 2014;6:346-350
  6. Kelly JR, Denry I. Stabilized zirconia as a structural ceramic: an overview. Dent Mater 2008; 24(3): 289-298.
  7. Kobayashi K, Kuwajima H, Masaki T. Phase change and mechanical properties of ZrO2-Y2O3 solid electrolyte after aging. Solid State Ionics 1981; 3(4):489-495.