SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Cumhuriyet Dental Journal / 2015 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1

Numerical analysis of the effect of implant geometry to stress distributions of the three different commercial dental implant system

Murat Yavuz SOLMAZ
Abubekir ELTAS
Tolga TOPKAYA
Serkan DÜNDAR
Pages
17–24
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusions: The crestal bone loss in the neck region of the implants reduced the long-termsurvival rate of implants.The length and the size of the implant are the two important factorsin the stress distribution.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The success of dental implants is related to the quality, quantity of local bones,implant design and surgical technique.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: For this purpose three different implant models which are currentlybeing used in clinical cases constructed by using ANSYS Workbench 12.1.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusions: The crestal bone loss in the neck region of the implants reduced the long-termsurvival rate of implants.The length and the size of the implant are the two important factorsin the stress distribution.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: The success of dental implants is related to the quality, quantity of local bones,implant design and surgical technique. Implant diameter and length are accepted as keyfactors. Present work focuses to investigate the effect of titanium implant geometry to stressdistributions in implant system. Materials and Methods: For this purpose three different implant models which are currentlybeing used in clinical cases constructed by using ANSYS Workbench 12.1. The stress distributionson components of implant system under static loadings were analyzed for all models. Results: The maximum stress values that occurred in all components happen in the case ofloading in which the Nucleoss T-4 (Nucleoss, Turkiye) implant is used, but the occurred loweststress values happen in the case of Fı loading in which Nobel Active (Nobel Biocare, Zurich,Switzerland) implant is used. In all models, the maximum tensions have occurred in the neckregion of the implants. Conclusions: The crestal bone loss in the neck region of the implants reduced the long-termsurvival rate of implants.The length and the size of the implant are the two important factorsin the stress distribution.

🔖

Cite This Article

SOLMAZ, M. Y., ELTAS, A., TOPKAYA, T., DÜNDAR, S. (2022). Numerical analysis of the effect of implant geometry to stress distributions of the three different commercial dental implant system. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1, 17–24. https://ajindex.com/articles/477085

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Branemark PI, Adell R, Breine U, Hansson BO, Lindstrom J, Ohlsson A. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1969;3:81-100
  2. Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, Behneke A, Behneke N, Hirt HP, et al. Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:161-172
  3. Bozkaya D, Muftu S, Muftu A. Evaluation of load transfer characteristics of five different implants in compact bone at different load levels by finite elements analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:523-530
  4. Petrie CS, Williams JL. Comparative evaluation of implant designs: influence of diameter, length, and taper on strains in the alveolar crest. A three-dimensional finite-element analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:486-494
  5. Acar A, İnan Ö. İmplant destekli protezlerde okluzyon. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 2001;4,1:52-56
  6. Chun HJ, Cheong SY, Han JH, Heo SJ, Chung JP, Rhyu IC, et al. Evaluation of design parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:565-574
  7. Tada S, Stegaroiu R, Kitamura E, Miyakawa O, Kusakari H. Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/strain distribution in bone around implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:357-368
  8. Anitua E, Tapia R, Luzuriaga F, Orive G. Influence of implant length, diameter, and geometry on stress distribution: a finite element analysis. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2010;30:89-95
  9. Teixeira ER, Sato Y, Akagawa Y, Shindoi N. A comparative evaluation of mandibular finite element models with different lengths and elements for implant biomechanics. J Oral Rehabil 1998;25:299-303
  10. Geng JP, Ma QS, Xu W, Tan KB, Liu GR. Finite element analysis of four thread-form configurations in a stepped screw implant. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:233-239
  11. Akpinar I, Demirel F, Parnas L, Sahin S. A comparison of stress and strain distribution characteristics of two different rigid implant designs for distal-extension fixed prostheses. Quintessence Int 1996;27:11-17
  12. Holmgren EP, Seckinger RJ, Kilgren LM, Mante F. Evaluating parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis- -a two-dimensional comparative study examining the effects of implant diameter, implant shape, and load direction. J Oral I