Journals / Cumhuriyet Dental Journal / 2018 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 4

THE PLAQUE REMOVAL EFFECTIVENESS OF POWERED AND MANUAL TOOTH BRUSH IN CHILDREN: A PILOT STUDY

Çocuklarda Otomatik ve Manuel Diş Fırçalarının Plak Uzaklaştırma Etkinliği: Bir Pilot Çalışma

Pages
327–334
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Friedmantest and Wilcoxon signed rank test were used forcomparison the jaws and powered brush /manual brush.Significance at p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Aim of this study was to compare the plaquereducing effectiveness of powered and manual toothbrushing in a small group of children.Materials and Methods: Ten children aged between 7 to10 years old were included the study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Each child firstlyused manual tooth brush (ORAL B Stages for children).After two weeks children were asked to use powered toothbrush (ORAL-B TRIUMPH 5000 SMART GUIDE) fortwo weeks.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Friedmantest and Wilcoxon signed rank test were used forcomparison the jaws and powered brush /manual brush.Significance at p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Aim of this study was to compare the plaquereducing effectiveness of powered and manual toothbrushing in a small group of children.Materials and Methods: Ten children aged between 7 to10 years old were included the study. Each child firstlyused manual tooth brush (ORAL B Stages for children).After two weeks children were asked to use powered toothbrush (ORAL-B TRIUMPH 5000 SMART GUIDE) fortwo weeks. Turesky modification of the Quigley and HeinPlaque Index (TQHPI) and Approximal Plaque Index(API) scores were recorded every two weeks. Friedmantest and Wilcoxon signed rank test were used forcomparison the jaws and powered brush /manual brush.Significance at p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı bir grup çocukta otomatik ve manuel diş fırçalamanın dental plak uzaklaştırmadaki etkinliğini karşılaştırmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışmaya 7 ile 10 yaş arası 10 çocuk dahil edilmiştir. Her çocuk ilk önce 2 hafta süre ile manuel diş fırçası kullanmıştır (ORAL B Stages). İki hafta sonunda çocuklarda plak indeksleri ölçülmüştür. Sonrasında çocuklara iki hafta standart diş fırçalamaya devam etmeleri istenmiş ve bu iki haftanın sonunda çocuklardan otomatik diş fırçasına (ORAL-B TRIUMPH 5000 SMART GUIDE) geçmeleri söylenmiştir. Quigley ve Hein Plaque Index (TQHPI) ve Approximal Plaque Index (API) skorlarının Turesky modifikasyonu her iki haftada bir kaydedilmiştir. Otomatik fırça/manuel fırçaların karşılaştırılmasında Friedman testi ve Wilcoxon işaretli rank testi kullanılmış, anlamlılık p

🔖

Cite This Article

DURHAN, M. A., ULUAKAY, M. (2022). THE PLAQUE REMOVAL EFFECTIVENESS OF POWERED AND MANUAL TOOTH BRUSH IN CHILDREN: A PILOT STUDY. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 4, 327–334. https://ajindex.com/articles/477011

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Garcia-Carrillo A, Jover A, Pla R, et al. Manual versus sonic powered toothbrushing in patients with intellectual disability: a clusterrandomised clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2016
  2. Vibhute A, Vandana KL. The effectiveness of manual versus powered toothbrushes for plaque removal and gingival health: A metaanalysis. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2012;16(2):156-160
  3. Yousaf A. AN, Manzoor AM., Yasmin R. Comparison of Powered and Manual Toothbrushes in Removal of Plaque. Pakistan Oral & Dental Journal. 2012;32(1):120-123
  4. Aljafari A, Rice C, Gallagher JE, et al. An oral health education video game for high caries risk children: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2015;16:237
  5. Re D, Augusti G, Battaglia D, et al. Is a new sonic toothbrush more effective in plaque removal than a manual toothbrush? Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2015;16(1):13-18
  6. Jain Y. A comparison of the efficacy of powered and manual toothbrushes in controlling plaque and gingivitis: a clinical study. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2013;5:3-9
  7. Goyal S, Thomas BS, Bhat KM, et al. Manual toothbrushing reinforced with audiovisual instruction versus powered toothbrushing among institutionalized mentally challenged subjects--a randomized cross-over clinical trial. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011;16(3):e359-364
  8. Pine CM, McGoldrick PM, Burnside G, et al. An intervention programme to establish regular toothbrushing: understanding parents' beliefs and motivating children. Int Dent J. 2000;Suppl Creating A Successful:312-323
  9. Gray-Burrows KA, Day PF, Marshman Z, et al. Using intervention mapping to develop a home-based parental-supervised toothbrushing intervention for young children. Implement Sci. 2016;11(1):61. 10.Cunha-Cruz J, Milgrom P, Shirtcliff RM, et al. "Everybody brush!": protocol for a parallelgroup randomized controlled trial of a familyfocused primary prevention program with distribution of oral hygiene products and education to increase frequency of toothbrushing. JMIR Res Protoc. 2015;4(2):e58. 11.Ghassemi A, Vorwerk L, Hooper W, et al. Comparative plaque removal efficacy of a new children's powered toothbrush and a manual toothbrush. J Clin Dent. 2013;24(1):1-4. 12.Mielczarek A. BT, Knopka T. An Assessment of the Effect of Manual and Electric Toothbrushes on Hard and Soft Oral Tissue. Dent Med Probl. 2013;50(4):472-475. 13.Turesky S, Gilmore ND, Glickman I. Reduced plaque formation by the chloromethyl analogue of victamine C. J Periodontol. 197