Journals / Cumhuriyet Dental Journal / 2021 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 1

DENTIN BOND STRENGTH AND MICROLEAKAGE COMPARISON OF THREE DIFFERENT UNIVERSAL ADHESIVES

Üç Farklı Üniversal Adeziv Sistemin Dentine Makaslama Bağlanma Dayanımlarının ve Mikrosızıntı Değerlerinin Karşılaştırılması

Pages
10–20
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: Among the adhesives, the highest bond strength was achieved in Optibond XTR, while Tokuyama Universal showed the lowest bond strength values (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the bond strength and micro-leakage of three different universal adhesive systems applied in self-etch mode to dentin.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: To evaluate bond strength, the mid-coronal dentin surfaces of forty-five human molar teeth were exposed and randomly assigned into three groups according to the following adhesive application: Single Bond Universal (3M ESPE), Optibond XTR (Kerr), and Tokuyama Universal (Tokuyama Dental) (n=15).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: Among the adhesives, the highest bond strength was achieved in Optibond XTR, while Tokuyama Universal showed the lowest bond strength values (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the bond strength and micro-leakage of three different universal adhesive systems applied in self-etch mode to dentin. Materials and Methods: To evaluate bond strength, the mid-coronal dentin surfaces of forty-five human molar teeth were exposed and randomly assigned into three groups according to the following adhesive application: Single Bond Universal (3M ESPE), Optibond XTR (Kerr), and Tokuyama Universal (Tokuyama Dental) (n=15). The shear bond strength test was performed after composite build-up. Then, the fractured surfaces were evaluated using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). To evaluate micro-leakage, facial class V cavities were prepared to forty-five human premolars and randomly assigned into identical three experimental groups described above (n=15). After composite resin restoration of cavities, the specimens were thermo- cycled for 500 cycles and then immersed in basic fuchsine, sectioned, and examined under a stereo-microscope. Data were evaluated using one-way ANOVA, Tukey’s, Chi-square and Mann Whitney U tests. Results: Among the adhesives, the highest bond strength was achieved in Optibond XTR, while Tokuyama Universal showed the lowest bond strength values (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, self-etch modda kullanılan üç farklı üniversal adeziv sistemin dentine olan bağlanma dayanımını ve mikrosızıntısı değerlendirmek ve karşılaştırmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bağlanma dayanımını değerlendirmek için, 45 adet çekilmiş insan molar dişlerinin orta koronal dentin yüzeyleri açığa çıkartıldı, hazırlanan dişler adeziv sistemler uygulanmak üzere rastgele 3 gruba ayrıldı: Single Bond Universal (3M ESPE), Optibond XTR (Kerr) ve Tokuyama Universal (Tokuyama Dental) (n=15). Kompozit rezin yerleştirilmesinin ardından örneklere makaslama bağlanma dayanımı testi uygulandı. Kırılan örnekleri kopma yüzeyleri taramalı elektron mikroskobunda incelendi. M,ikrosızıntıyı değerlendirmek için, 45 adet çekilmiş insan premolar dişlerinin bukkal yüzeylerinde Sınıf V kaviteler hazırlandı. Hazırlanan dişlere bağlanma dayanımında belirtilen gruplarda olduğu gibi aynı adeziv sistemler uygulandı (n=15). Kaviteler kompozit rezin ile restore edildi ve örnekler 500 devir termal siklusa tabi tutuldu. Ardından bazik fuksinde bekletilen örnekler ikiye ayrıldı ve kesit yüzeyleri stereomikroskop altında incelendi. Veriler tek yönlü ANOVA, Tukey, Ki-kare ve Mann Whitney U testleri kullanılarak analiz edildi. Bulgular: Çalışmada kullanılan adeziv sistemler arasında en yüksek bağlanma dayanımı Optibond XTR’de görülürken, en düşük bağlanma dayanımı ise Tokuyama Üniversal’de gözlendi. (p

🔖

Cite This Article

Özkanoğlu, S., Akin, E. G. G. (2022). DENTIN BOND STRENGTH AND MICROLEAKAGE COMPARISON OF THREE DIFFERENT UNIVERSAL ADHESIVES. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 1, 10–20. https://ajindex.com/articles/476894

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Ruggeri A, Cadenaro M, Di Lenarda R, Dorigo EDS. Dental adhesion review: aging and stability of the bonded interface. Dent Mater 2008;24:90-101
  2. Reis A, Grande R, Oliveira G, Lopes G, Loguercio A. A 2-year evaluation of moisture on microtensile bond strength and nanoleakage. Dent Mater 2007;23:862-870
  3. Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Eight-year clinical evaluation of a 2-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective enamel etching. Dent Mater 2010;26:1176-1184
  4. Tuncer D, Çelik Ç, Çehreli SB, Arhun N. Comparison of microleakage of a multi-mode adhesive system with contemporary adhesives in class II resin restorations. J Adh Sci Technol 2014;28:1288-1297
  5. Hanabusa M, Mine A, Kuboki T, Momoi Y, Van Ende A, Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J. Bonding effectiveness of a new ‘multi-mode’ adhesive to enamel Comparison of Different Universal Adhesive Systems 20 and dentine. J Dent 2012;40:475-484
  6. St AG, Wilder JA, Perdigão J, Swift JE. Microleakage of class V composites using different placement and curing techniques: an in vitro study. Am J Dent 2002;15:244-247
  7. Taschner M, Kümmerling M, Lohbauer U, Breschi L, Petschelt A, Frankenberger R. Effect of double-layer application on dentin bond durability of one-step selfetch adhesives. Oper Dent 2014;39:416-426
  8. Sezinando A, Perdigão J, Regalheiro R. Dentin bond strengths of four adhesion strategies after thermal fatigue and 6 month water storage. J Esthet Restor Dent 2012;24:345-355
  9. Rengo C, Goracci C, Juloski J, Chieffi N, Giovannetti A, Vichi A, Ferrari M. Influence of phosphoric acid etching on microleakage of a self etch adhesive and a self adhering composite. Aust Dent J 2012;57:220-226
  10. Krämer N, Tilch D, Lücker S, Frankenberger R. Status of ten self etch adhesives for bonding to dentin of primary teeth. Int J Paediatr Dent 2014;24:192-199
  11. Marchesi G, Frassetto A, Visintini E, Diolosà M, Turco G, Salgarello S, Di Lenarda R, Cadenaro M, Breschi L. Influence of ageing on self etch adhesives: one step vs. two step systems. Eur J Oral Sci 2013;121:43-49
  12. Juloski J, Goracci C, Rengo C, Giovannetti A, Vichi A, Vulicevic A, Ferrari M. Enamel and dentin bond strength of new simplified adhesive materials with and without preliminary phosphoric acid-etching. Am J Dent 2012;25:239
  13. Meharry M, Moazzami S, Li Y. Comparison of enamel and dentin shear bond strengths of current dental bonding adhesives from three bo