SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Cumhuriyet Dental Journal / 2021 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 2

THREE-DIMENSIONAL CALCULATION OF SINUS AUGMENTATION VOLUME AFTER MAXILLARY SINUS FLOOR ELEVATION

Samir Goyushov
Erhan Dursun
Kaan Orhan
Tolga F. Tözüm
Pages
163–169
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusions: The grafted volume of the sinus cavity was defined as a safe volume in terms of serious complications during and after the surgery.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study aimed to calculate the volume of the maxillary sinus and grafted part of it with different modes of three-dimensional reconstruction software.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: This retrospective volumetric cone-beam computed tomography study was carried out on 21 patients/ 36 maxillary sinuses who had undergone maxillary sinus lift surgery using a lateral approach, between 2010 and 2016 at the Department Periodontology.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusions: The grafted volume of the sinus cavity was defined as a safe volume in terms of serious complications during and after the surgery.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to calculate the volume of the maxillary sinus and grafted part of it with different modes of three-dimensional reconstruction software. Materials and Methods: This retrospective volumetric cone-beam computed tomography study was carried out on 21 patients/ 36 maxillary sinuses who had undergone maxillary sinus lift surgery using a lateral approach, between 2010 and 2016 at the Department Periodontology. All statistical analyses were performed by using the NCSS (Number Cruncher Statistical System, Kaysville, Utah, U.S.A.) software. P values 0.05). An occupied portion of the sinus cavity after lateral sinus floor elevation surgery was approximately 14.87 %. Furthermore, the volume through manual and automatical modes of the software do not affect the results (p>0.05). The right and left sides of the maxillary sinus volumes were not different from each other. Gender and measuring mode was not found to be related to volumetric values of the maxillary sinus cavity. Conclusions: The grafted volume of the sinus cavity was defined as a safe volume in terms of serious complications during and after the surgery.

🔖

Cite This Article

Goyushov, S., Dursun, E., Orhan, K., Tözüm, T. F. (2022). THREE-DIMENSIONAL CALCULATION OF SINUS AUGMENTATION VOLUME AFTER MAXILLARY SINUS FLOOR ELEVATION. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 2, 163–169. https://ajindex.com/articles/476872

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Lerno P. Identification using the maxillary sinus. Chir Dent Fr. 1983; 53: 39-40
  2. Uchida Y, Goto M, Katsuki T, Akiyoshi T. A cadaveric study of maxillary sinus size as an aid in bone grafting of the maxillary sinus floor. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998; 56: 1158-1163
  3. Anagnostopoulou S, Venieratos D, Spyropoulos N. Classification of human maxillar sinuses according to their geometric features. Anat Anz. 1991; 173: 121-130
  4. Ariji Y, Kuroki T, Moriguchi S, Ariji E, Kanda S. Age changes in the volume of the human maxillary sinus: a study using computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1994; 23: 163-168
  5. Tatum JH. Maxillary and sinus implant reconstructions. Dent Clin North Am. 1986; 30: 207- 229
  6. Lopez MA, Andreasi MB, Confalone L, Lico S, Carinci F. Crestal sinus lift using a fluido-dynamic computer guided precise and atraumatic technique. J Biol Regul Homeost agents. 2015; 29: 67-73
  7. Zitzmann NU, Schärer P. Sinus elevation procedures in the resorbed posterior maxilla: Comparison of the crestal and lateral approaches. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1998; 85: 8-17
  8. Jensen OT, Shulman LB, Block MS, Iacono VJ. Report of the sinus consensus conference of 1996. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998; 13: 11-45
  9. Del Fabbro M, Testori T, Francetti L, Weinstein R. Systematic review of survival rates for implants placed in the grafted maxillary sinus. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2004; 24: 565-577
  10. Lin YH, Yang YC, Wen SC, Wang HL. The influence of sinus membrane thickness upon membrane perforation during lateral window sinus augmentation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016; 27: 612-617
  11. Aimetti M, Massei G, Morra M, Cardesi E, Romano F. Correlation between gingival phenotype and Schneiderian membrane thickness. Int Journal Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008; 23: 1128-1132
  12. Aranyarachkul P, Caruso J, Gantes B, Schulz E, Riggs M, Dus I, Yamada JM, Crigger M. Bone density assessments of dental implant sites: 2. Quantitative cone-beam computerized tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005; 20: 416-424
  13. Hallman M, Hedin M, Sennerby L, Lundgren S. A prospective 1-year clinical and radiographic study of implants placed after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with bovine hydroxyapatite and autogenous bone. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002; 60: 277-284
  14. Valentini P, Abensur D. Maxillary sinus floor elevation for implant placement with demineralized freeze-dried bone and bovine bone (Bio-Oss): a clinical study