Journals / Cumhuriyet Dental Journal / 2021 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 2

EFFECT OF TRIBOCHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT TECHNIQUE ON THE PUSH-OUT BOND STRENGTH OF NOVEL CAD/CAM POST RESTORATIONS

Pages
153–162
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: The lowest PBS values were obtained for ZR post groups that untreated (17.24±1.33 MPa) and tribochemical coated (23.09±2.16 MPa) (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of tribochemical surface treatment (TBC) on the push-out bond strength (PBS) of novel CAD/CAM post materials to root canal dentin.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The teeth were randomly divided into 7 groups according to the post material used: fiber-reinforced composite post as control (FRC), zirconia (ZR), lithium disilicate (LDS), zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (ZLS), nano-ceramic (RMC_CE), nanoparticle-filled (RMC_LU), and polymer-infiltrated-ceramic (RMC_EN).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: The lowest PBS values were obtained for ZR post groups that untreated (17.24±1.33 MPa) and tribochemical coated (23.09±2.16 MPa) (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of tribochemical surface treatment (TBC) on the push-out bond strength (PBS) of novel CAD/CAM post materials to root canal dentin. Materials and Methods: Fifty-two freshly extracted human maxillary central incisors were selected and endodontically treated. The teeth were randomly divided into 7 groups according to the post material used: fiber-reinforced composite post as control (FRC), zirconia (ZR), lithium disilicate (LDS), zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (ZLS), nano-ceramic (RMC_CE), nanoparticle-filled (RMC_LU), and polymer-infiltrated-ceramic (RMC_EN). Then the posts, except FRC, were randomly assigned into two sub-groups according to the surface treatment technique used: Control (no treatment), TBC (CoJet). Following post space preparation, posts were cemented with dual-cure self-adhesive resin cement. A total of 156 sections were obtained (n=12), 3 sections on each root of the tooth. The PBS test was performed for each slice and the results were analyzed by using two-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD tests (α=0.05). The fracture modes were examined. Results: The lowest PBS values were obtained for ZR post groups that untreated (17.24±1.33 MPa) and tribochemical coated (23.09±2.16 MPa) (p

🔖

Cite This Article

Küçükekenci, A. S., Dede, D. Ö. (2022). EFFECT OF TRIBOCHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT TECHNIQUE ON THE PUSH-OUT BOND STRENGTH OF NOVEL CAD/CAM POST RESTORATIONS. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 2, 153–162. https://ajindex.com/articles/476869

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Alsamadani KH, Abdaziz E-SM, Gad E-S. Influence of different restorative techniques on the strength of endodontically treated weakened roots. Int J Dent 2012;2012:343712
  2. Galhano GA, Valandro LF, de Melo RM, Scotti R, Bottino MA. Evaluation of the flexural strength of carbon fiber-, quartz fiber-, and glass fiber-based posts. J Endod 2005;31:209-211
  3. C Goracci, M Ferrari. Current perspectives on post systems: a literature review. Aust Dent J 2011;56:77-83
  4. Fundaoğlu Küçükekenci F, Küçükekenci AS. Effect of ultrasonic and Nd: Yag laser activation on irrigants on the push-out bond strength of fiber post to the root canal. J Appl Oral Sci 2019 May 30;27:e20180420
  5. Michalakis KX, Hirayama H, Sfolkos J, Sfolkos K. Light transmission of posts and cores used for the anterior esthetic region. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2004;24:462 469
  6. Bankoğlu Güngör M, Turhan Bal B, Yilmaz H, Aydin C, Karakoca Nemli S. Fracture strength of CAD/CAM fabricated lithium disilicate and resin nano ceramic restorations used for endodontically treated teeth. Dent Mater J 2017;36:135-141
  7. Ozcan N, Sahin E. In vitro evaluation of the fracture strength of all-ceramic core materials on zirconium posts. Eur J Dent 2013;7:455-460
  8. Malkondu O, Tinastepe N, Akan E, Kazazoglu E. An overview of monolithic zirconia in dentistry. Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment 2016;30:644-652
  9. Ichikawa Y, Akagawa Y, Nikai H, Tsuru H. Tissue compatibility and stability of a new zirconia ceramic in vivo. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:322-326
  10. Silva LH, Lima E, Miranda RBP, Favero SS, Lohbauer U, Cesar PF. Dental ceramics: a review of new materials and processing methods. Braz Oral Res 2017;58:133-146
  11. Chen C, Trindade FZ, de Jager N, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. The fracture resistance of a CAD/CAM Resin Nano Ceramic (RNC) and a CAD ceramic at different thicknesses. Dent Mater 2014;30:954-962
  12. Nergiz I, Schmage P, Platzer U, McMullan-Vogel CG. Effect of different surface textures on retentive strength of tapared posts. J Prostht Dent 1997;78:451- 457
  13. Awada A, Nathanson D. Mechanical properties of resin-ceramic CAD/CAM restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114:587-593
  14. Elsaka SE. Repair bond strength of resin composite to a novel CAD/CAM hybrid ceramic using different repair systems. Dent Mater J 2015;34:161–167
  15. Bebek Serra Oguz Ahmet, Ferhan Egilmez, Gulfem Ergun, Isil Cekic Nagas. Surface treatment effects on bond strength of CAD/CAM fabricated