SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Contemporary Educational Technology / 2019 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1

Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Mathematics Teachers and the Effect of Demographic Variables

Fatma ÖZÜDOĞRU
Melike ÖZÜDOĞRU
Pages
1–24
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, it was found that teaching experience and level of school had no significanteffect on TPACK domains.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:With increasing global requirements for the use of technological tools and resources in K-12settings, there is a need to examine the technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)levels of mathematics teachers because technology use in class may enhance students’engagement and motivation in learning mathematics.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data were collected from 202 mathematics teachers in the springsemester of 2016-2017 academic year.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, it was found that teaching experience and level of school had no significanteffect on TPACK domains.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2016-2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

With increasing global requirements for the use of technological tools and resources in K-12settings, there is a need to examine the technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)levels of mathematics teachers because technology use in class may enhance students’engagement and motivation in learning mathematics. Hence, the purpose of this study was todevelop and validate a TPACK scale to be used in investigating mathematics teachers’knowledge levels in TPACK components, and investigate if mathematics teachers’ TPACK levelsdiffered in terms of gender, teaching experience and level of school. This study is based onsurvey research design. Data were collected from 202 mathematics teachers in the springsemester of 2016-2017 academic year. MANOVA was used for data analysis. As a result ofexploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, the TPACK instrument was developed as a validand reliable 39-item 5-point Likert scale consisting of six scales: 1. Technological Knowledge, 2.Pedagogical Knowledge, 3. Content Knowledge, 4. Technological Content Knowledge, 5.Pedagogical Content Knowledge and 6. TPACK. The results also revealed that there weresignificant differences between gender and technological knowledge domain in favor of maleteachers. However, it was found that teaching experience and level of school had no significanteffect on TPACK domains.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZÜDOĞRU, F., ÖZÜDOĞRU, M. (2022). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Mathematics Teachers and the Effect of Demographic Variables. Contemporary Educational Technology, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1, 1–24. https://ajindex.com/articles/476593

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Acikgul, K. & Aslaner, R. (2015). İlkogretim matematik ogretmen adaylarinin TPAB guven algilarinin incelenmesi. Erzincan Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 17(1), 118-152.
  2. Altun, T. (2013). Examination of classroom teachers’ technological pedagogical and content knowledge on the basis of their demographic profiles. Croatian Journal of Education, 15(2), 365-397.
  3. Baran, E. & Canbazoglu-Bilici, S. (2015). A review of the research on technological pedagogical content knowledge: The case of Turkey. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 30(1), 15–32.
  4. Bulut, A. (2012). Investigating perceptions of preservice mathematics teachers on their technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) regarding geometry (Unpublished masters’ thesis). Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
  5. Canbazoglu-Bilici, S., Yamak, H., Kavak, N., & Guzey, S. (2013). Technological pedagogical content knowledge self efficacy scale for preservice science teachers: Construction, validation and reliability. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 52, 37-60.
  6. Cetin, I. & Erdogan, A. (2018). Development, validity and reliability study of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) efficiency scale for mathematics teacher candidates. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 5(1), 50-62.
  7. Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2011). Exploring the factor structure of the constructs of technological, pedagogical, content knowledge (TPACK). The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 20(3), 595-603.
  8. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Boston: Pearson. Dede, Y. & Argun, Z. (2003). Matematik ogretiminde elektronik tablolarin kullanimi. Pamukkale University Faculty of Education Journal, 2(14), 113-131.
  9. Demir, S. & Bozkurt, A. (2011). Primary mathematics teachers’ views about their competencies concerning the integration of technology. Ilkogretim Online, 10(3), 850-860.
  10. Dikkartin-Ovez, F. T. & Akyuz, G. (2013). Ilkogretim matematik ogretmeni adaylarinin teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi yapilarinin modellenmesi. Education and Science, 38(170), 321-334.
  11. Erdogan, A. & Sahin, I. (2010). Relationship between math teacher candidates’ technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) and achievement levels. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 2707-2711. DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.400 Feldt, R. C., Graham, M., & Dew, D. (2011). Measuring adjustment to college: Construc