SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Biotech Studies / 2012 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2

Determination of In Vitro High Level Salinity Tolerance of Some Durum Wheat (T. durum Desf.) Cultivars

Bazı Makarnalık Buğday (T. durum Desf.) Çeşitlerinin In Vitro Koşullarda Yüksek Tuz Dozlarına Toleransının Belirlenmesi

Nur Koyuncu
Pages
70–74
Publication Date
2012-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Accordingly it was found that Mirzabey-2000 and Selçuklu-97 cultivars grew better than the other cultivars at high salt levels and they may be used as genitors in breeding programs.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Salt tolerance of 13 durum wheat (T. durum Desf.) genotypes, which are grown in Turkey, were assessed on in vitro conditions using mature embryos.
📊
Key Findings & Data:They were exposed to different concentration of NaCl (0,3,6,9,12,15,18 g/l) from initiation of the callus induction.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Accordingly it was found that Mirzabey-2000 and Selçuklu-97 cultivars grew better than the other cultivars at high salt levels and they may be used as genitors in breeding programs.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:NaCl · kallus oluşumu · in vitro

Abstract

Salt tolerance of 13 durum wheat (T. durum Desf.) genotypes, which are grown in Turkey, were assessed on in vitro conditions using mature embryos. They were exposed to different concentration of NaCl (0,3,6,9,12,15,18 g/l) from initiation of the callus induction. Cultivars evaluated based on callus induction, weight of callus and number of regenerated callus parameters. All parameters decreased with increasing salt levels and there were significant differences among genotypes. Accordingly it was found that Mirzabey-2000 and Selçuklu-97 cultivars grew better than the other cultivars at high salt levels and they may be used as genitors in breeding programs.

Özet

Türkiye’de yetiştirilen 13 makarnalık buğday (T. durum Desf.) çeşidinin olgunlaşmış embriyoları kullanılarak in vitro koşullarda tuza toleransları değerlendirilmiştir. Değişik NaCl konsantrasyonları (0,3,6,9,12,15,18 g/l) embriyolara kallus oluşumu aşamasından itibaren uygulanmıştır. Çeşitler kallus oluşumu, kallus ağırlığı ve rejenere kallus sayısı parametrelerine göre değerlendirilmiştir. Artan tuz dozları ile bütün parametrelere ilişkin değerler azalmış ve çeşitler arasında önemli faklılıklar bulunmuştur. Buna göre Mirzabey-2000 ve Selçuklu-97 çeşitlerinin yüksek tuz dozlarında, diğer çeşitlere göre daha iyi geliştiği ve bu çeşitlerin ıslah çalışmalarında genitör olarak kullanılabileceği belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Koyuncu, N. (2012). Determination of In Vitro High Level Salinity Tolerance of Some Durum Wheat (T. durum Desf.) Cultivars. Biotech Studies, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2, 70–74. https://ajindex.com/articles/476533

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Abdel-Aleem M.M.M., S.R.S. Sabry, N.S. Hanna, 1994. Seedling characteristics as selection criteria for salinity tolerance in wheat. Rachis, 11(1-2): 33-40.
  2. Almansouri M., J.M. Kinet. and, S. Lutts, 1999. Compared effects of sudden and progressive impositions of salt stres in three durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) cultivars. J. Plant Physiol, 154: 743-752. Arzani A. and S-S. Mirodjagh. 1999. Response of durum wheat cultivars to immature embryo culture, callus induction and in vitro salt stress. Plant Cell Tiss Org, 58: 67-72. Ashraf M. 1994. Breeding for salinity tolerance in plants. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 13(1): 17-42. Ashraf M and N.A. Akram. 2009. Improving salinity tolerance of plants through conventional breeding and genetic engineering: An analytical comparison. Biotechnol Adv, 27: 744–752. Barakat M.N. and T.H. Abdel-Latif. 1996. In vitro selection of wheat callus tolerant to high levels of salt and plant regeneration. Euphytica, 91: 127-140.
  3. Dokuyucu T., S. Akkececi, A. Akkaya and R. Kara. 2005. Investigation of the response of bread wheat cultivars to salinity by using callus cultures. J Environ Biol, 26(2): 251-255.
  4. Gill B.S., R. Appels, A-M. Botha-Oberholster, C.R. Buell, J.L. Bennetzen, B. Chalhoub, F. Chumley, J. Dvorak, M. Iwanaga, B. Keller, W. Li, W.R. McCombie, Y. Ogihara, F. Quetier, and T. Sasaki, 2004. A workshop report on wheat genome sequencing: International genome research on wheat consortium. Genetics, 168: 1087-1096 Karadimova M. and G. Djambova. 1993. Increased NaCl-Tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L. and T. durum Desf.) through in vitro selection. In vitro Cell Dev Biol, 29P: 180-182.
  5. Kintzios S.E., M. Barberaki, G. Aivalakis, J. Drossopoulus, and C.D. Holevas, 1997. In vitro morphogenetic responses of mature wheat embryos to different NaCl concentrations and growth regulator treatments. Plant Breeding, 116: 113-118.
  6. Lazar M., G.B. Collins and W.E. Vian. 1983. Genetic and environmental effects on the growth and differentiation of wheat and somatic cell cultures. J of Heredity, 74:353-357. Munns R and A. Termaat. 1986. Whole-plant responses to salinity. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 13: 143-160.
  7. Munsuz N., G. Çaycı, S. Sözüdoğru Ok, 2001. Toprak ıslahı ve düzenleyiciler. Ankara Üniversitesi Yayını: 1518, 335 s, Ankara. Murashige T. and F. Skoog. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant, 15: 473-497.
  8. Özgen M., M. Türet, S. Altınok, C. Sancak, 19