Journals / Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences / 2016 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3

Quality Control Analysis of the Plants Sold as Senna in Turkey

Türkiye’de Sinameki Olarak Satılan Bitkiler Üzerinde Yapılan Kalite Kontrol Analizleri

Pages
116–120
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Quantitative and qualitative analyses of sennosides in the samples were performed by thin layer chromatography (TLC) and ultraviolet spectroscopy (UV) spectroscopy methods.Results: According to the results of the analysis, the samples were not found to be suitable as per the officinal drug standards in European Pharmacopoeia 7.0.Conclusion: According to the results of the quality control analysis, senna samples sold by akhtars were observed to be unsafe for the treatment of constipation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to perform quality control analysis of the plants sold as senna in the market.Methods: The samples obtained from akhtars were evaluated according to European Pharmacopoeia 7.0 standard.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Macroscopic, microscopic, and quantitative microscopy (stomatal index) studies and total ash, loss on drying, ash insoluble in hydrochloric acid, and foreign matter analyses were performed in the samples.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Quantitative and qualitative analyses of sennosides in the samples were performed by thin layer chromatography (TLC) and ultraviolet spectroscopy (UV) spectroscopy methods.Results: According to the results of the analysis, the samples were not found to be suitable as per the officinal drug standards in European Pharmacopoeia 7.0.Conclusion: According to the results of the quality control analysis, senna samples sold by akhtars were observed to be unsafe for the treatment of constipation.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Cassia angustifolia · Cassia acutifolia · Sinameki

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to perform quality control analysis of the plants sold as senna in the market.Methods: The samples obtained from akhtars were evaluated according to European Pharmacopoeia 7.0 standard. Macroscopic, microscopic, and quantitative microscopy (stomatal index) studies and total ash, loss on drying, ash insoluble in hydrochloric acid, and foreign matter analyses were performed in the samples. Quantitative and qualitative analyses of sennosides in the samples were performed by thin layer chromatography (TLC) and ultraviolet spectroscopy (UV) spectroscopy methods.Results: According to the results of the analysis, the samples were not found to be suitable as per the officinal drug standards in European Pharmacopoeia 7.0.Conclusion: According to the results of the quality control analysis, senna samples sold by akhtars were observed to be unsafe for the treatment of constipation.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, piyasada “sinameki” olarak satılan bitkilerin kalite kontrollerinin yapılmasıdır.Yöntemler: Aktarlardan alınan örnekler Avrupa Farmakopesi 7,0 standartlarına göre değerlendirilmiştir. Bu örneklerde makroskobik, mikroskobik ve kantitatif mikroskobi (stoma indisi) çalışmaları, yabancı madde tayini, kurutmada kayıp, bütün kül miktar tayini ve asitte çözünmeyen kül tayini yapılmıştır. Örneklerdeki sennozitlerin kalitatif ve kantitatif analizleri ince tabaka kromatografisi (İTK) ve ultraviyole spektroskobisi (UV) yöntemleri ile yapılmıştır.Bulgular: Tüm analiz sonuçlarına göre, örneklerin Avrupa Farmakopesi 7,0’da yer alan tıbbi drog standartlarına uygun olmadığı bulunmuştur.Sonuç: Kalite kontrol analiz sonuçlarına göre, aktarlarda sinameki olarak satılan örneklerin kabızlık tedavisi için çok güvenilir olmadığı gözlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ORHAN, D. D., SAYIN, E. (2022). Quality Control Analysis of the Plants Sold as Senna in Turkey. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3, 116–120. https://ajindex.com/articles/474466

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Dünya Sağlık Örgütü. Monographs on Selected Medicinal Plants (Vol. 1). Geneva: WHO; 1999. p. 241-9. The Plant List [Internet]. Royal Botanic gardens, Kew and Missouri Bota- nical Garden [updated 2013 September; cited 2016 March 17]. Available from: http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl1.1/record/ild-1115. Erduran Nemutlu F. Çanakkale’de dış mekan süs bitkisi işletmelerinin de- ğerlendirilmesi. Kastamonu Univ J For Fac 2013; 13: 72-83. Baytop T. Türkiye’de Bitkiler ile Tedavi. 2. Baskı. İstanbul: Nobel Tıp Kita- bevleri; 1999.
  2. Metzger W, Reif K. Determination of 1,8-dihydroxyanthranoids in Senna. J Chromatogr A 1996; 740: 133-8. [CrossRef] Yılmaz G. Cassia acutifolia-Cassia angustifolia (Sinameki). In: Demirezer Ö, Ersöz T, Saraçoğlu İ, Şener B, editors Tedavide Kullanılan Bitkiler ‘’FFD Monografları’’. 2nd ed. Ankara: Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri; 2011. p. 109-12. European Pharmacopoeia. 7th ed. Germany: Druckerei C.H. Beck Press; 2011. p. 1236-1238.
  3. Brendel WD, Schneider D. Quantitative determination of sennosides in senna pods and senna leaves. I. Method. Planta Med 1974; 25: 63-7. [CrossRef] Brendel WD, Schneider D. Quantitative analysis of folia and fructus Sen- nae. II. Planta Med. 1974; 25: 342-9. [CrossRef]