Journals / Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences / 2019 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 4

Assessment of Expectation, Attitude and Preconceptions in a Group Patient Applying for Dental Implant Treatment

Pages
334–339
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As education level rose, the preference for a removable denture decreased (p<0.05)Conclusion: According to the results we obtained from a limited sample, patients may have misinformation and incomplete expectation about implant therapy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate expectation, attitude, and preconceptions regarding dental implant therapy among a selected sample group of dental patients who applied for implant treatment.Methods: This cross-sectional hospital-based study was carried out using a questionnaire with 132 patients who applied for implant treatment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study questionnaire contained 20 multiple-choice questions on the patients’ demographics, sources of information, knowledge, attitude, expectations, and related factors regarding dental implant treatment.Results: Majority of the patients stated that they did not have enough knowledge about implant treatment procedure to be applied.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As education level rose, the preference for a removable denture decreased (p<0.05)Conclusion: According to the results we obtained from a limited sample, patients may have misinformation and incomplete expectation about implant therapy.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Implant therapy · patient · questionnaire

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate expectation, attitude, and preconceptions regarding dental implant therapy among a selected sample group of dental patients who applied for implant treatment.Methods: This cross-sectional hospital-based study was carried out using a questionnaire with 132 patients who applied for implant treatment. The study questionnaire contained 20 multiple-choice questions on the patients’ demographics, sources of information, knowledge, attitude, expectations, and related factors regarding dental implant treatment.Results: Majority of the patients stated that they did not have enough knowledge about implant treatment procedure to be applied. Of the patients, 23.5% thought that the implant would be used for a lifetime, 56.8% thought that post-implant care should be like the natural teeth care, 36.4% stated that implants need more care than natural teeth. They stated that the major disadvantages of implant treatment were the high cost (53.0%), difficulty in treatment (28.0%), and long treatment time (18.9%). It was determined that the main reason for the delay was the high cost of the treatment. As education level rose, the preference for a removable denture decreased (p<0.05)Conclusion: According to the results we obtained from a limited sample, patients may have misinformation and incomplete expectation about implant therapy. Informing and educating the patients is very important for deciding which treatment to pursue and setting realistic patient expectations regarding treatment outcomes.

🔖

Cite This Article

Özdoğan, M. S., Gümuşok, M., Ertem, Y. S., Ömeroğlu, A., Erdem, M. (2022). Assessment of Expectation, Attitude and Preconceptions in a Group Patient Applying for Dental Implant Treatment. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 4, 334–339. https://ajindex.com/articles/474339

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Sahoo S, Suvarna SR, Sethi K, Kumar P. Awareness and need of dental implant therapy as pertinent to indian situation: an overview. Int J Med Public Health 2013;3:124-5
  2. Oshida Y, Tuna EB, Aktören O, Gençay K. Dental implant systems. Int J Mol Sci 2010;11:1580-678
  3. Allen PF, McMillan AS. A longitudinal study of quality of life outcomes in older adults requesting implant prostheses and complete removable dentures. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:173-9
  4. Mgbeokwere U, Okoye L, Ekwueme OA. Survey of the knowledge of dental implants as a choice in treatment of edentulous jaws among health workers in Government Dental Clinics in Enugu. Ann Med Health Sci Res, 2011;1:91-6
  5. Naert I, Koutsikakis G, Duyck J, Quirynen M, Jacobs R, van Steenberghe D. Biologic outcome of implant-supported restorations in the treatment of partial edentulism. Part I: a longitudinal clinical evaluation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:381-9
  6. Mericske-Stern RD, Taylor TD, Belser U. Management of the edentulous patient. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11 Suppl 1:108-25
  7. Tepper G, Haas R, Mailath G, et al. Representative marketing-oriented study on implants in the Austrian population. I. Level of information, sources of information and need for patient information. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:621-33
  8. Saha A, Dutta S, Vijaya V, Rajnikant N. Awareness among patients regarding implants as a treatment option for replacement of missing teeth in Chattisgarh. J Int Oral Health 2013;5:48-52
  9. Ajayi YO, Akinboboye BO, Dosumu OO, Akeredolu PA. Awareness of dental implants among dental patients in Nigeria. JMBR 2016;15:40-8
  10. Kohli S, Bhatia S, Kaur A, Rathakrishnan T. Trends in patients' mindset on dental implants: a survey in Malaysia. J Dent Implant 2014;4:33-7
  11. Ravi Kumar C, Pratap KVNR, Venkateswararao G. Dental implants as an option in replacing missing teeth: a patient awareness survey in Khammam, Andhra Pradesh. Ind J Dental Sci 2011;3:33-7
  12. Berge TI. Public awareness, information sources and evaluation of oral implant treatment in Norway. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:401-8
  13. Zimmer CM, Zimmer WM, Williams J, Liesener J. Public awareness and acceptance of dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:207-17
  14. Ozçakır Tomruk C, Ozkurt-Kayahan Z, Sençift K. Patients' knowledge and awareness of dental implants in a Turkish subpopulation. J Adv Prosthodont 2014;6:133-7
  15. Akagawa Y, Rachi Y, Matsumoto T, Tsuru H. Attitudes of remova