SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3

Evaluation of the position of lingula mandible, mental foramen and lingual foramen of individuals in the 7-17 age groups via Cone-Beam Computed Tomography

Seval Bayrak
Duygu Goller Bulut
Pages
375–380
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: It is necessary to determine anatomical landmarks in children prior to the surgical operations to prevent the possible neurovascular complications.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The identification of landmarks in mandible is an important stage before dental procedures ın pediatric patients.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The distance of lingula mandible to the anterior, posterior, superior, and inferior borders of mandible and to distal edge of the alveolar socket of the 1st molar tooth were measured.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: It is necessary to determine anatomical landmarks in children prior to the surgical operations to prevent the possible neurovascular complications.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:anatomic landmarks · cone beam computed tomography · lingual foramen

Abstract

Objective: The identification of landmarks in mandible is an important stage before dental procedures ın pediatric patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the location of lingula mandible, mental foramen (MF) and lingual foramen (LF) in a paediatric population. Methods: The distance of lingula mandible to the anterior, posterior, superior, and inferior borders of mandible and to distal edge of the alveolar socket of the 1st molar tooth were measured. MF and LF distance to the top of the alveolar crest and the inferior edge of the basis mandibulae were determined. The horizontal location of MF was evaluated. Results: The distance between lingula mandible and the sigmoid notch, the inferior border of the ramus, the anterior border of the ramus and the posterior border of the ramus was 18.63±4.52 mm, 24.81 ± 5.19 mm 14.67±2.39 mm, and 15.14 ± 3.06 mm respectively. The MF was mostly located between long axes of first and second premolar teeth. LF is closer to the inferior edge of the basis mandibulae. Conclusion: It is necessary to determine anatomical landmarks in children prior to the surgical operations to prevent the possible neurovascular complications.

🔖

Cite This Article

Bayrak, S., Bulut, D. G. (2022). Evaluation of the position of lingula mandible, mental foramen and lingual foramen of individuals in the 7-17 age groups via Cone-Beam Computed Tomography. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3, 375–380. https://ajindex.com/articles/474221

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. da Fontoura RA, Vasconcellos HA, Campos AE. Morphologic basis for the intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy: anatomic and radiographic localization of the mandibular foramen. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002;60:660-5; discussion 5-6
  2. Trost O, Salignon V, Cheynel N, Malka G, Trouilloud P. A simple method to locate mandibular foramen: preliminary radiological study. Surg Radiol Anat 2010;32:927-931
  3. Cantekin K, Sekerci AE, Miloglu O, Buyuk SK. Identification of the mandibular landmarks in a pediatric population. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2014;19:e136-41
  4. Jung YH, Cho BH, Hwang JJ. Location and shape of the mandibular lingula: Comparison of skeletal class I and class III patients using panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography. Imaging Sci Dent 2018;48:185-190
  5. Cillo JE, Stella JP. Selection of sagittal split ramus osteotomy technique based on skeletal anatomy and planned distal segment movement: current therapy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;63:109-114
  6. Fujimura K, Segami N, Kobayashi S. Anatomical study of the complications of intraoral vertico-sagittal ramus osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006;64:384-9
  7. Kositbowornchai S, Siritapetawee M, Damrongrungruang T, Khongkankong W, Chatrchaiwiwatana S, Khamanarong K, et al. Shape of the lingula and its localization by panoramic radiograph versus dry mandibular measurement. Surg Radiol Anat 2007;29:689-694
  8. Jansisyanont P, Apinhasmit W, Chompoopong S. Shape, height, and location of the lingula for sagittal ramus osteotomy in Thais. Clin Anat 2009;22:787-793
  9. Lim MY, Lim WW, Rajan S, Nambiar P, Ngeow WC. Age-related changes in the location of the mandibular and mental foramen in children with Mongoloid skeletal pattern. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2015;16:397-407
  10. Moiseiwitsch JR. Position of the mental foramen in a North American, white population. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998;85:457-460
  11. Green RM. The position of the mental foramen: a comparison between the southern (Hong Kong) Chinese and other ethnic and racial groups. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1987;63:287-290
  12. Balcioglu HA, Kilic C, Akyol M, Ulusoy AT. Horizontal migration of pre- and postnatal mental foramen: an anatomic study. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2011;75:1436-1441
  13. He X, Jiang J, Cai W, Pan Y, Yang Y, Zhu K, et al. Assessment of the appearance, location and morphology of mandibular lingual foramina using cone beam computed tomography. Int Dent J 2016;66:272-279