Journals / Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences / 2022 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 2

Perceived Stress and Perceived Vulnerability at Healthcare Workers during Covid-19 Pandemic

Pages
431–438
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results:Overall, 244 HCWs aged between 20 and 60 years old participated in the survey and the mean scores for perceived stress (PS), perceived infectability (PI), and germ aversion (GA) were 20.15, 28.83 and 47.78, respectively.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective:This study evaluated the psychological effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare workers (HCWs) and determined several risk factors..
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: An online cross-sectional survey was administered to 244 HCWs recruited via the Google Docs platform.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results:Overall, 244 HCWs aged between 20 and 60 years old participated in the survey and the mean scores for perceived stress (PS), perceived infectability (PI), and germ aversion (GA) were 20.15, 28.83 and 47.78, respectively.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:perceived stress · perceived vulnerability · COVID-19

Abstract

Objective:This study evaluated the psychological effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare workers (HCWs) and determined several risk factors.. Methods: An online cross-sectional survey was administered to 244 HCWs recruited via the Google Docs platform. The 36-item questionnaire comprised three domains: demographic details, the Perceived Stress Scale-10 (PSS-10), and the Perceived Vulnerability to Disease Questionnaire (PVDQ).Multiple linear regression analysis was used to determine the risk factors for adverse psychological responses. Results:Overall, 244 HCWs aged between 20 and 60 years old participated in the survey and the mean scores for perceived stress (PS), perceived infectability (PI), and germ aversion (GA) were 20.15, 28.83 and 47.78, respectively. Additionally, they were positively associated with gender. Females’ score on PS (p=0.001), PI (p=0.017), and GA were also significantly higher than men (p=0.001).Scores on PSS-10 showed a significant difference between age groups (p=0.010) in contrast to GA (p=0.515) or PI (p=0.346).The regression model showed that the PI scores were higher among men (B=3.145) than among women (p=0.019).The analysis showed significant effects working during COVID-19 on PI scores (B=3.101; p=0.006).Furthermore, GA was also significantly related to worsening of the COVID-19 pandemic (B=2.73; p=0.004) and was higher among females (B=4.622; p<0.001). Conclusion:According to the results of the study, gender, age, professional experience and knowledge, and working during a pandemic were important factors for PS and PVD. Additionally, supporting the mental health for HCWs obtaining adequate support and taking precautions are essential.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARGUL, B., YAZICI, T. N., GÖKKAYA, B. (2022). Perceived Stress and Perceived Vulnerability at Healthcare Workers during Covid-19 Pandemic. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 2, 431–438. https://ajindex.com/articles/474147

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Weilenmann S, Ernst J, Petry H, Pfaltz M, Sazpinar O, Gehrke S, et al. Health Care Workers’ Mental Health During the First Weeks of the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic in Switzerland-A Cross Sectional Study. Front Psychiatry.2021;12:594340
  2. Reuters. CDC Chief Warns Second COVID-19 Wave May Be Worse, Arriving with Flu Season. Published [22 April 2020]. Accessed [8 July 2020]. https://news.yahoo.com/cdc-chief warns-2nd-covid-233817366.html [3] Shanafelt TD, Noseworthy JH. Executive Leadership and Physician Well-being. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2017;92:129- 146
  3. Wallace JE, Lemaire JB, Ghali WA. Physician wellness: A missing quality indicator. Lancet. 2009;374:1714-1721
  4. Jennings BM. Work Stress and Burnout Among Nurses: Role of the Work Environment and Working Conditions. Hughes RG, editor. Patient Safety and Quality: An Evidence-Based Handbook for Nurses. Advances in Patient Safety. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 2008.
  5. Poghosyan L, Clarke SP, Finlayson M, Aiken LH. Nurse burnout and quality of care: Cross-national investigation in six countries. Res Nurs Health.2010;33:288-298
  6. Panagioti M, Geraghty K, Johnson J. Association Between Physician Burnout and Patient Safety, Professionalism, and Patient Satisfaction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178:1317
  7. Scheepers RA, Boerebach BCM, Arah OA, Heineman MJ, Lombarts KM. A Systematic Review of the Impact of Physicians’ Occupational Well-Being on the Quality of Patient Care. Int J Behav Med. 2015;22:683-698
  8. Shanafelt T, Ripp J, Trockel M. Understanding and Addressing Sources of Anxiety Among Health Care Professionals During the COVID-19 Pandemic. JAMA. 2020;323(21):2133-2134
  9. Duncan LA, Schaller M, Park JH. Perceived vulnerability to disease: Development and validation of a 15-item self-repnstrument. Pers Individ Differ. 2009;47(6):541-546
  10. González-Olmo MJ, Ortega-Martínez AR, Delgado-Ramos B, Romero-Maroto M, Carrillo-Diaz M. Perceived vulnerability to Coronavirus infection: impact on dental practice. Braz Oral Res. 2020;34:e044
  11. Zhang W, Wang K, Yin L. Mental Health and Psychosocial Problems of Medical Health Workers during the COVID-19 Epidemic in China. Psychother Psychosom. 2020;89:242-250
  12. Cohen S, Deverts DJ, Miller GE. Psychological Stress and Disease. JAMA 2007;298: 1685-1687
  13. Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health