SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Cito Eğitim: Kuram ve Uygulama / 2013 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 20

Pupil monitoring system and computerized adaptive testing administrations

Öğrenci izleme sistemi ve bilgisayar ortamında gerçekleştirilen bireyselleştirilmiş test uygulamalar

Semirhan GÖKÇE
Pages
17–26
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In fact, the general aim is determining optimum CAT algorithm for PMS.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Although there exist many international computer-based standardized tests such as Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL), Graduate Record Examination (GRE) ve Graduate Management Admission Test (GMAT), there is no such computer-based test held nationally except Pupil Monitoring System (PMS) developed by Cito Türkiye.
📊
Key Findings & Data:PMS is unique in Turkey not only because of the fact that it is computer-based and items are tested by pilot studies but also the analysis are conducted on Item Response Theory (IRT) basis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In fact, the general aim is determining optimum CAT algorithm for PMS.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Although there exist many international computer-based standardized tests such as Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL), Graduate Record Examination (GRE) ve Graduate Management Admission Test (GMAT), there is no such computer-based test held nationally except Pupil Monitoring System (PMS) developed by Cito Türkiye. PMS is unique in Turkey not only because of the fact that it is computer-based and items are tested by pilot studies but also the analysis are conducted on Item Response Theory (IRT) basis. The other computer-based test administration which uses IRT models is the computerized adaptive test (CAT). The current study examines the applicability of Pupil Monitoring System as computerized adaptive so that simulations are designed to test different scenarios. In fact, the general aim is determining optimum CAT algorithm for PMS.

Özet

Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL), Graduate Record Examination (GRE) ve Graduate Management Admission Test (GMAT) gibi uluslararası düzeyde bilgisayar ortamında uygulanan birçok geniş ölçekli test bulunmasına karşın ülkemizde Cito Türkiye tarafından geliştirilen Öğrenci İzleme Sistemi (ÖİS) uygulamaları haricinde bilgisayar ortamında uygulanan, soruların pilot çalışmayla denendiği, analizlerinin Madde Tepki Kuramı (MTK) temelinde gerçekleştirildiği ve raporlandığı bir başka uygulama bulunmamaktadır. MTK modellerini kullanan ve bilgisayar ortamında gerçekleştirilen diğer bir uygulama türü de bireyselleştirilmiş (adaptif) testlerdir. Bu çalışmada, bilgisayar ortamında gerçekleştirilen ÖİS uygulamalarının bireyselleştirilmiş test olarak uygulanabilirliği irdelenmektedir. Bu sebeple farklı senaryolar kullanılarak ÖİS’e en uygun bireyselleştirilmiş test algoritmasının simülasyonlar yardımıyla bulunması amaçlanmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖKÇE, S. (2022). Pupil monitoring system and computerized adaptive testing administrations. Cito Eğitim: Kuram ve Uygulama, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 20, 17–26. https://ajindex.com/articles/474045

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Bergstrom, B. A., Lunz, M. E., & Gershon, R. C. (1992). Altering the level of difficulty in computer adaptive tests. Applied Measure ment in Education, 5(2), 137-149.
  2. Eggen, T. J. H. M. (2004). Contributions to the theory and practice of computerized adaptive testing. Dissertation. Print Partners Ipskamp B.V., Enschede. Eggen, T. J. H. M. (2007). Choices in CAT models in the context of educational testing. In D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing. Retrieved 25.04.2012 from http://www.psych.umn.edu/psylabs/CAT Central/ Eggen, T. J. H. M. & Verschoor, A. J. (2006). Optimal testing with easy or difficult items in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30(5), 379-393.
  3. ETS (1994). Computer-based tests: Can they be fair to everyone? Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. Glas, C. A. W., Geerlings, H. (2009). Psychometric aspects of pupil monitoring systems. Studies in Educational Evaluation 35, 83- 88. Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan H. & Rogers H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of item response theory. Measurement methods for the social sciences series. Sage Publications, Inc. İşeri, A. İ. (2002). Assessment of students’ mathematics achievement through computer adaptive testing procedures. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi.
  4. Kalender, İ. (2009). Başarı ve yetenek kestirimlerinde yeni bir yaklaşım: bilgisayar ortamında bireyselleştirilmiş testler (compute rized adaptive tests-CAT). Cito Eğitim: Kuram ve Uygulama, 5, 39-48. Lilley M. & Barker, T. (2004). A computer-adaptive test that facilitates the modification of previously entered responses: an empirical study. Proceedings of the 2004 Intelligent Tutoring Systems Conference, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3220, pp. 22-33.
  5. Lord, F. M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Lawrence Erlbaum Associate, Inc. Meijer, R. R., Nering M. L., (1999). Computerized adaptive testing: Overview and introduction. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23(3), 187-194.
  6. Mills, C. N. & Stocking, M. L. (1996). Practical issues in large-scale computerized adaptive testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 9(4), 287-304.
  7. Van der Linden, W. J. (1995). Advances in computer applications. In T. Oakland & R. K. Hambleton (Eds.), International perspectives on academic assessment, (pp. 105-124). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  8. Van der Linden, W. J. (2001). Computerized test construction. Research report. Twen