SavedAdd your journal

Journals / BDDK Bankacılık ve Finansal Piyasalar Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2

Do Credits Affect Money Supply and Deposits, or Vice Versa, or Interconnected?

Krediler Para Arzını ve Mevduatları Etkiler mi veya Tersi, ya da Bunlar Birbirleriyle Bağlantılı mıdır?

Göksel TİRYAKİ
Mübariz HASANOV
Pages
217–245
Publication Date
2022-09-22
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

While our results suggest that credits may generate money and deposits endogenously, this finding does not imply that money is purely an endogenous variable.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:There are different approaches regarding the effect of credits on deposits and money supply.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Specifically, using quarterly observations on M1, M2, M3, deposits in Turkish Lira (TL-Lira) and Foreign Currency (FX) deposits as well as credits spanning the December 2005 - September 2021 period we find that credits have significant effects on money stock and deposits.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:While our results suggest that credits may generate money and deposits endogenously, this finding does not imply that money is purely an endogenous variable.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Credit · Deposit · Money Supply

Abstract

There are different approaches regarding the effect of credits on deposits and money supply. In particular, the view that banks do not need deposits to create credit has become increasingly popular. In this paper we empirically investigate the relationship among money supply, credits and deposits based on the Turkish experience. Specifically, using quarterly observations on M1, M2, M3, deposits in Turkish Lira (TL-Lira) and Foreign Currency (FX) deposits as well as credits spanning the December 2005 - September 2021 period we find that credits have significant effects on money stock and deposits. However, our results also suggest that credits are not the most important determinant of money supply or deposits. While our results suggest that credits may generate money and deposits endogenously, this finding does not imply that money is purely an endogenous variable.

🔖

Cite This Article

TİRYAKİ, G., HASANOV, M. (2022). Do Credits Affect Money Supply and Deposits, or Vice Versa, or Interconnected?. BDDK Bankacılık ve Finansal Piyasalar Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2, 217–245. https://ajindex.com/articles/473846

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Aktakaş, B. G., Akın, C., Uçan, O. (2015). The Nature of Money in Post-Keynesian Institutionalists: Turkey Case. Niğde Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(1), 277-287
  2. Aktop V. S. (2010). Türkiye’de Para Arzının İçselliği: Ekonometrik Bir Uygulama, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İktisat Anabilim Dalı, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 2010, İzmir
  3. Baştav, L. (2021). Endogenous Money Supply: Turkish Economy (2011-2018). Fiscaoeconomia, 5(2), 595-610
  4. Bourva, J. L. (1992). Money Creation and Credit Multipliers, Review of Political Economy, 4:4, 447-466 5. Demirgil, B. (2020). Para Arzı İçsellik Analizi: Türkiye Örneği. İşletme Ekonomi ve Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3 (2), 144-152
  5. Fullwiler, S., Bell, S. A., Wray, L. R. (2012). Modern Money Theory: A Response to Critics (January 15, 2012). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/ abstract=2008542 7. Güney İ. E., Çepni O. (2016). Endogeneity of Money Supply: Evidence From Turkey, CBT Research Notes in Economics 1619, Research and Monetary Policy Department, Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey
  6. Hamilton, J.D. (1994). Time Series Analysis, New Jersey, Princeton University Press
  7. Holmes, A. R. (1969). Operational Constraints on the Stabilization of Money Supply Growth, Controlling Monetary Aggregates. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, June 1969, 73-96
  8. Ingham, G. (2009). Notes on Revisiting the Credit Theory of Money, Nanterre, September 2009, 8-15
  9. Jakab Z., Kumhof M. (2015), Banks Are Not Intermediaries of Loanable Funds and Why This Matters, The Bank of England, Working Paper No. 529, May 2015
  10. Johansen, S. (1991). Estimation and Hypothesis Testing of Cointegration Vectors in Gaussian Vector Autoregressive Models. Econometrica. 59 (6): 1551–1580
  11. Kamacı, A., Ceyhan, M. S., Peçe, M. A. (2017). Kredi Hacminin Para Arzı ve Ekonomik Büyüme Üzerine Etkisi, Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, ICMEB17 Özel Sayısı, 400-409
  12. Karaduman, H. A. (2003). Post Keynesyen İktisatta ve Türkiye’de Para Arzının İçselliği. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Yıldız TeknikÜniversitesi, İstanbul
  13. Kofoğlu, İ. H. (2018). Para Arzı İçsellik Analizi Türkiye Örneği (2006-2017). Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Elektronik Dergisi, 9(25)
  14. Köksel, B. (2016). Türkiye Ekonomisinde Para Arzının İçselliği: 2006-2014 Dönemi Üzerine Bir Uygulama. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 30 (2)
  15. Mcleay M., Radia A., Thomas R. (2014